0-16:40 Primer to author's disputes. 18:40 reading from the Bell Curve 41:45 Quotes from The Bell Curve 52:25: types of intelligence quoted from the bell curve 1:23:00 to end My Alt-theory of intelligence Close to the end of the reading portion of this video, 1:12:25 I am noting the 15 point spread between two individuals. Pointing to how Murray & Hernstein mention that "We could tell you nothing with any confidence" Yet, Since their book is about affects of average intelligences in populations from which policy should be analyzed and adjusted, my intent to pause on the 'individual IQ spread of 15 as being "unconfident" is magnanimously interesting in it's own right, but here I am pausing for the banal notion that if Murray and Herstien are going to speak confidently NOW about population differences being significant, then to what furtherance? I wish to 'scale up' the analog here and say that if a 15 point spread is not telling of X individual's performance within Y population, than a 15 point aggregate spread of Y Population is not necessarily confident to tell us what "performance" it will have Z civilization. And why not scale up an analog here? Does it not remediate Murray and Herrstein's public policy ambitions in their thesis, at least to some extent? The Bell Curve was produced before the modern-global internet, and even now the attempts to note the cognition of ALL minds and populations on the planet is not without it's problems, considerations and redresses. To expand on this a tad, consider that if abstracting differing populations was limited to regional populations strictly, and each denoted planetary region's population was granted a unifying score, and measured against a global aggregate of populations; this measure would not be unlike an individual's relative score to it's regional population. My criticism is namely that the authors themselves are fixated on the intra-policy concerns with respect to national "legal and cultural norms & structures" mostly, from which the author's somewhat arbitrarily decide are worthy of maintenance or relegation. It assumes a static picture and axial-orientation of g. This is not done arbitrarily per se, but it is done as a proclaimed virtue to maintain an orientation of preferred functions of individual human brains. shrouded in an older generation definition of virtue. Stefan Molyneux videos I played and extracted bits from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFAv3IfVUnI at 5:40 and 14:00 "So we KNOW why." derp! -What Pisses Me Off About The Google "Anti-Diversity" Memo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxIw9fyIK_c at 7:55, 11:40-12:00, 13:10, 16:00-18:00 cultural bias... is "just a Hypothesis." ~shit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3OAzCGEz3c Eric Orwoll video used: The " ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0CeJROLGFA

... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIOgTPhJcE0