https://future.figucarolina.org/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_838 https://www.figu.org/ch/files/downloads/kontaktberichte/figu_kontaktbericht_838.pdf https://www.figu.org/ch/index/downloads/kontaktberichte Conversation between Florena and Bermunda of the Plejaran Federation and 'Billy' Eduard Albert Meier, BEAM Eight hundred and thirty-eighth contact Friday, March 10, 2023 13:34 h Billy: There you are both, welcome and greetings. It's been a long time since you were last here. Florena: Yes, dear father friend, and the time was long for us. But greetings too. Bermunda: I want to say that too, so greetings, dear friend. It was really long for us... ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZqRiX258x4

https://videos.figucarolina.org/w/bKyzJNRUXSWzfXirFyhxRY https://freundderwahrheit.de/wahrheit_ist____.html ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg548pyeCzU

http://www.figu.org/ch/files/downloads/bulletin/figu_bulletin_101.pdf Page 11 Leserfrage Wann kann ein Mensch als ‹Gerechter› bezeichnet werden? Achim Wolf, Deutschland Antwort Die Antwort umfasst altherkömmlich 33 Punkte, die jedoch nach Verstand und Vernunft beliebig weitergeführt werden können. Was ist ein gerechter Mensch 1. Ein Mensch kann als ‹Gerechter› bezeichnet werden, wenn er alle seine als Mensch würdigen Pflichten erfüllt; 2. wenn er den Frieden pflegt und ihn auch lebt; 3. wenn er grosszügig den Menschen in jeder Beziehung die Freiheit gewährt; 4. wenn er alles Böse, alles Falsche, alles Ungerechte und Schlechte, alle Unehrlichkeit von sich weist; 5. wenn er allen Schaden gegen Mitmenschen, die Systeme der Natur und die Fauna und Flora bewusst vermeidet; 6. wenn er alles Gute und Positive liebt und pflegt; 7. wenn er in wahrer Liebe lebt, wächst und sich diesbezüglich immer weiterentwickelt; 8. wenn er in umfänglicher Rechtschaffenheit sein Leben führt; 9. wenn er frei ist von persönlichen unguten, negativen und schadenbringenden Absichten und Interessen; 10. wenn er rundum reinen Gewissens ist; ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDB1wE8vDW8

http://skillssolon.com/index.php/2018/07/10/excerpt-from-the-official-contact-discussion-on-tuesday-29-may-2018/ Excerpt from the official contact discussion on Tuesday, 29 May 2018 Translated with DeepL.com Disclaimer: This is an unofficial translation. Source: http://www.figu.org/ch/verein/periodika/zeitzeichen/2018/nr-97 Page 1 to 10 Ptaah: ... But now I would like to say to you again that you should say and explain a little more about what you explained during our conversation on 28 April with your long monologue, because I think that further remarks are really necessary. Billy: You are probably right, because the whole thing cannot be explained enough, but I think - because you mentioned the travels in the past with Sfath to the Paleolithic, etc., where already the first form of faith arose, after which after a little more than two minutes the first killing or the first murder took place, as I experienced and experienced observantly - that I do not have to talk about it. Nor do I need to talk about the horrible religious human sacrifices that I made in various other epochs with various ethnic groups and clans together with Sfath, but also with Ascetic... well, I think that would lead much too far, because the whole of what I can present and explain in another longer monologue covers a great deal, so even today there will not be enough time to list all the facts. What I would have to explain and explain would fill several books I would have to write about it. But I'd like to add something to the whole thing, maybe... wait,... yeah,... give me a minute, please. ... Well, then it would be good if I were to take a special position on the whole thing, but that will again lead to a longer, but also this time incomplete monologue, because nothing can be said completely that needs to be said and explained. ... Well,... even if I attack or condemn the religions and sects, and thus also the religious, sectarian delusion of the believers, as well as the factors of religious contexts in the relationship, that religious delusion is based on the stupidity, influenceability and instability of the believers, this absolutely does not mean that I attack or condemn the believing people as such or the believing-privileged people as people verbally or in any other way. What I have to criticize, criticize, criticize and mock is therefore - and this must be absolutely clear and understandable said - not the believing man as man, because as such he is for me a creative being and as such in every relationship of aggression and insult etc. absolutely unassailable and taboo. So I dare not, in any way whatsoever, to unbecomingly attack or inadequately insult a religious, sectarian or otherwise delusional, insane or enthusiastic person as a human being in any verbal fo ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq8Umw2HS5U