"In January 2019, YouTube announced that they will be cracking down on conspiracy theories by changing search results and suggested videos to reduce the spread of “borderline content”, that “comes close to — but doesn’t quite cross the line of — violating our Community Guidelines”. This includes suggestions to videos “promoting a phony miracle cure for a serious illness” or “making blatantly false claims about historic events like 9/11”, that could “misinform users in harmful ways”. This came after repeated criticism from the mainstream media that YouTube’s recommendation algorithm is an engine for far-right radicalization and fake news...

The only way to find out what YouTube’s conspiracy crackdown really means is to go straight to the data. By closely monitoring their recommendations, I hope to be able to piece together patterns about how they are influencing politics. Who are the real winners and losers of Youtube’s conspiracy crackdown?"

That's from Mark Ledwich's recent article: https://medium.com/@markoledwich/the-winners-and-losers-of-youtubes-conspiracy-crackdown-60804c3e0436

Visualization of US Political YouTube:
https://pyt.azureedge.net/

My articles:
https://medium.com/@markoledwich

If you'd like to join my forum, request an invitation here: http://bit.ly/join-otherlife-via-youtube
Become a supporting member at https://patreon.com/jmrphy
Based Deleuze: https://theotherlifenow.com/based-deleuze
Free course on Data Blogging with R: https://jmrphy.ck.page/data-blogging-mini-course
Free course on how to be a cancel-proof intellectual on the internet: https://jmrphy.ck.page/f443443b16
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZIXxCIojrs