Calling out corruption number 2 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l3IWEmWU1I

Carl Edward Fleury was live ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGswuZQbBis

The Canadian Swamp Part Deux on Conspiracy Cafe ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7wcb9RMIhw

THIS IS THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF CANADAGRANDJURY.CA HELD SEPTEMBER 20, 2015 canadagrandjury.ca, September 20, 2015, video 9823 Jacques Antoine Normandin (JAN), president of the Grand Jury So listen, the session continues, I would ask the assembly to respect a certain decorum, so the terms must be careful and all that. You can ask questions but we will say as we say, we are listening to Master Michel Lebrun (ex-lawyer) and Jean-François here, this is very important, these are constitutional questions, questions of law, so I think that will educate a lot of people. Michel Hardoin (MH), secretary of the Grand Jury If we have questions, we will ask them afterwards. JAN: No or maybe even during, if it doesn't bother Michel or Jean-François, as long as there are no problems for me, Is it good? Jean-François Dubois (JFD), attorney Me it suits me, there are no problems, as long as there are not 10-12 questions at the same time which are going to embark one over the other, I would like that to stay here anyway and I would like that the table, Michel could have it in place instead of witnesses’. Jean-François Fortin (JFF), People's attorney I remind you that, we protect our witnesses according to the Rome agreement to which Canada is a signatory .... the Rome agreement is not symbolic . The reason why we do it like that, well eventually, we are looking for law enforcement . Whether it is that one, or it is the criminal code, we know at the same time that these people are illegitimate, so in reality, what is written in the criminal code, all the laws that were made after, after the High Betrayal: are invalid. Those too but they themselves claim that they act by that fact. That it is necessary to have a way of showing them a warrant to try to prove that they are illegitimate to be there. That is the purpose of a Grand Jury, it is to see if there is a case for criminal investigation. Jean-François will talk about what he is going to talk about, so I will let him do it .... For him I should not have to intervene like the others, he did not ask for my assistance so I will find myself sitting in these chairs, therefore, I won't have much to say. JFD So Mr. Lebrun probably, will come and testify regarding his experience that he had within the Bar, as a former lawyer. He will also, I would like to specify, that he was head of the National Union, that he was in part the last leader that there was in the National Union at the time which was the party of Maurice Duplessis. It was the party in 1968 which was there during the abolition of the Legislative Council, the power and then all that. And he was the last acting leader of that party, so he knows a lot. He has a good experience also; he is a teacher. So he will explain to you, to the best of ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kap_2eqawE