From Brian Harvey's channel Brian Harvey's caption: "This is the real reason I was PHONE TAPPED. Because Reggie was my FRIEND." ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blSPV-Cv1zI
Taken from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7Dh4LA_NwA
Published on Nov 25, 2017
Brian Harvey being arrested under an ACT (STATUTE LAW), to which I did NOT CONSENT.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvZdEl6IrYk
This is a hard to get plant here. I want to know if and how possible it is to get cuttings from it, to make more of them.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UNQ-1o92R4
Conservatively, from a snapshot in time analysis, taken from her own chosen thumbnails, of 21 of her uploads in this alter ego, Chloe George's mum has been visibly scratching herself in 4 of these, not counting 1, where she is moving her hand up or down to start or finish scratching.
This is 19.05% of the time (rounded up).
She's constantly speaking about infected vaginas, denies wearing the wig---which you can see---and thinks that her make up hides her manky skin.
Repulsion at her looks is universal, apart from some creepy male fans who seem to be turned on by how she juxtapositions her foulness with a constant series of made up stories about child abuse, for which she has no evidence of.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQkwTp2AvlY
(a.k.a. Danielle La Verite, but not really)
Since putting this video up, she's accused me of being a paedophile. I didn't see that one coming. I lied there.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3k3cJaEqaE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqpyQ0hSW80
Archived: 08 10 14 @ 1346ish
http://web.archive.org/web/20141008055302/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqpyQ0hSW80
Seemed to be a problem saving it to the archive as though there was someone on there trying to delete the comments, so they couldn't get the snapshot finalised
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JRFhbbKawI
I've been looking at Chris Spivey's site for eighteen months or so, but his moderators all of a sudden started to attack people for making fairly tame comments which were neither disrespectful, abusive, or obscene in their content (which is the apparent only reason for him considering blocking people, but which they do most days).
They made false accusations of things that I and others had said, and then put them down---saying that they were beyond the pale, having wrongly quoted them (and after removing their comment, not considering that these had been saved following their first, pre-block warnings and removal of a comment), accused them of calling them paedophiles, amongst other things, and, all this with zero efforts to address what their problems were with the commenter. All this with a load of crude obscenity.
The stupid thing is then they criticised an email which I'd sent to Chis, offering to assist him with his litterary and word processing style from a long time back, saying that I just kept not getting the message that they weren't interested.
Ironically, I had even spoken to Chis, telling him that he would get flack for harassment and the process that they have to follow, so all of the idiot things he did, were despite someone telling him the exact situation, which moving on past the date of this video, it is clear that he still hasn't taken on board---and keeps going on about "indictable" and that he was "arrested". It was all with his consent, which he's got the audacity to have a whole section of his site about, cou----------------wd Common Law. As with most things, Chris relies too heavily on the much criticised Daily Mail, and other troowf sites, with nameless authoers, who write about nothing other than what they've picked up from other ones---"documenid!"
They, uncharacteristically started to attack anyone who said anything re. paedophiles mainly being a danger to children from broken homes and that single mothers' children were prime targets. They went so far as to fabricate a story that someone blamed them (they allege) large increase in paedophilia on single mothers who are idiots, which no one had said, so they were acting really desperately. Where they've changed things, this is sometimes recoded.
The three site moderators were all at it, and it was, as I've said, out of character. I have to say I had seen them abuse people in the past, but very rarely and not lots of people in one set of comments.
Something strange is happening here, and I think the fact that they're all of a sudden Bill Maloney's best friends and protectors is very suspicious. I hope Chris is simply being taken advantage of, but can't presume this to be the case on the face of it. The link to the pro
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNTiqZ-cE64