In this segment from the 2nd lecture I gave in Amsterdam, I give plenty of evidence to show that NASA is not to be trusted - beginning with the meaning of the word "nasa" in Hebrew. I found it more than poetic that I was able to do so in the nation that exposed at least one of the moon rocks are fraudulent.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRr0B-l3gAY
EPISODE 40 - SKIBA NEWS NATION
Host: Jeremiah Skiba and Co-Host: Jake Grant Discuss:
• CURRENT NEWS
- A i-Mania is Spreading Like a Virus
- George Soros Trying to Undermine our Democracy.
- Attempting to Make Trump a Political Prisoner
- Confronting Fauci to His Face
- Russel Brand Exposing Pfizer on Bill Maher’s Show
- Nimrod And His Burial Place
• AN ALL NEW OPA’S CORNER
⬇️Show Opa Some Love And Subscribe To His YouTube Channel⬇️
- https://youtube.com/channel/UCLIF_9CyK82NzY6ufEQ5iMw
• HISTORY
- The Nuremberg Code, And How It’s Relevant Today!
- And Our Very Special Guest, @JeremiahSkiba ’s Mom @sheilaskiba On Her Upcoming Book About @RobSkiba , “The Protocol That Kills”
⬇️SIGN UP FOR SHEILA SKIBA'S BOOK⬇️
https://theprotocolthatkills.com/contact/#sign-up
⬇️OUR WEBSITE⬇️
https://skibanewsnation.com
⬇️FAN LINK⬇️
https://fanlink.to/skibanewsnation
***MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: WE ARE NOT MEDICAL EXPERTS NOR GIVING MEDICAL ADVICE***
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n76-ZysWC14
I recently saw a video dealing with body language and eye movements as an indicator of whether a person is lying or telling the truth. So, I thought I'd test the theory by looking at a recent video I had done wherein I was recalling certain events in my past and comparing it with Neil Armstrong recalling his alleged time on the moon. Is this a conclusive test? I don't know, but I do have to say, I find it pretty interesting.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFxavY2TVe0
This is Part 3 in a series I’ve been doing with Brian Godawa, wherein we discuss the so-called End Times from two totally different perspectives: Brian arguing in favor of a Preterist view and I argued from a Futurist view. In this broadcast we began to do a breakdown of the book of Revelation.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4X3GVRCxGA
Like many, I was out watching the infamous last of the "tetrad" blood moon lunar eclipses on the night of September 27th. The sun had gone down at about 7:17pm CST. The moon popped up right before that at about 7:11pm CST. Somehow the sun allegedly managed to rush out (in less than an hour) to it's position 180 degrees opposite the moon in order to cast the earth's shadow on it. Aside from the time issue, I am struggling to understand how a sun that just went down in the west could end up casting a shadow from the north onto the moon, which was in the east. I'll admit, I may be an idiot for putting this out there, but that just doesn't make sense to me.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZeCNy9Syhs
Continuing in our study of Genesis, this time we read from Genesis 39, Jasher 44, the Targum, the Legends of the Jews and from Jubilees chapters 36-39.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnzKOLexEU4
In this clip, I share my thoughts on the topic of the conehead skulls of Peru (and elsewhere) and how I think they may trace back to the wives of Noah's three sons. Why would they trace back to them? Well, assuming there were no other angelic "incursions" (there is no textual evidence that would suggest there were), then they had to come from somewhere. As I see it there are really only two possibilities:
1) They descended from people in the Pre-Flood world who had been genetically modified.
2) They were the product of continued genetic modification experiments in the Post-Flood world.
I lean toward the first option. But in either case - at least in my mind - they are still to be classified as Nephilim (hybrids), who must somehow trace back to the occupants on Noah's Ark because there is no evidence of continued angelic incursions. Also, they could not be the product of angelic copulation, because when angels mate with humans, you get giants. The conehead people were not giants. In fact, many of them were quite short (typically under 6 feet tall).
For a lot more detailed information on the elongated skulls of the ancients, please see Brien Foerster's recent lecture on this topic: https://youtu.be/8tZVSbWzvgU
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaaiAf7oUCY
OK. Don't go psycho on me if I'm wrong here. I'm just asking questions. It seems to me that the curvature math would have to be different if you are looking east-west on the various lines of latitude because the circumference would be more shallow than if you were at the equator or looking at any other direction apart from due east-west. For example, on my Lake Michigan test, we were on the 41.5 degree latitude. At that latitude, the circumference of the globe is not 24,874 miles. Rather, it is 18,630 miles, which would seem to require a much greater curvature than the usual 8 in. per mile squared. I'm not very mathematical, so if I am wrong, please tell me why - nicely. :)
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPWLqlGLVag