Science & Faith in Academia - an interview with Dr. Micah Green [audio only] | Think Theism
Originally recorded March 2016
Zach interviews Dr. Micah Green, Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Texas A&M University. The conversation ranges from the philosophy of naturalism, being a faithful Christian in the sciences, and historical Jesus studies.
Disclaimer: Think Theism is an independent podcast produced in association with Ratio Christi TAMU. The opinions, perspectives, and beliefs expressed in individual episodes are those of the participants only and not necessarily a reflection of Ratio Christi nor Texas A&M University. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-3KpOCY0wo
Weekly Meeting 4/4/2024
The fact that there is something rather than nothing poses an interesting challenge to
any worldview, but Theism is able to give a compelling answer.
This lecture is from our 2024 Spring lecture series. For more information and resources go to https://tx.ag/RatioChristi
Spring 2024 slides and handouts: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1B8Z4KtRud-cxTKGYx5hunvt88iwviUXD
DISCLAIMER
Think Theism lectures are supported by Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, but the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and critical thought about challenging questions.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1TZ_wgVkLk
Recorded October 24, 2019
The authority of the Bible is central to Christianity. Human authors were carried along by the Holy Spirit to provide the written revelation of God. Many Christians believe that God, being Truth itself, could not inspire a collection of documents containing any error, thus, leading to the idea of biblical inerrancy. But what does this mean? What constitutes an “error”? Are modern categories of history and literature appropriate to evaluate an ancient collection? In this episode, Katie surveys three perspectives from evangelical Christians.
1) Inerrancy is Too Simple to Describe the Bible: Peter Enns rejects inerrancy wholesale. No matter how defined, inerrancy doesn’t describe what the Bible does.
2) Inerrancy Through Accommodation: John R. Franke accepts inerrancy when cast in terms of the Bible as a missional text. Written for people of vastly different backgrounds, God’s Word accommodates to cross various boundaries.
3)Inerrancy as Descriptor, not Definer: Kevin J. Vanhoozer accepts inerrancy taking cues from St. Augustine. Inerrancy states what the Bible says is true, but does not tell you what the Bible says. Once inerrancy begins defining particular interpretations, it is (improperly) taking the place of hermeneutics
Each of these perspectives is spelled out in more detail in the book Five Views on Biblical Inerrancy (Zondervan, 2013). Additional contributors include Albert Mohler and Michael F. Bird.
Disclaimer: Think Theism is an independent podcast produced in association with Ratio Christi TAMU. The opinions, perspectives, and beliefs expressed in individual episodes are those of the participants only and not necessarily a reflection of Ratio Christi nor Texas A&M University.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtxAekPw8ug
This video is from our 2023 Spring lecture series. For more information and resources go to thinktheism.org
---------------------
DISCLAIMER
---------------------
Think Theism lectures are supported by Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, but the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and critical thought about challenging questions.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IKsWuRB8W4
This video is from our 2022 Fall lecture series. For more information and resources go to thinktheism.org
Note: This video has been slightly edited for length and clarity.
---------------------
DISCLAIMER
---------------------
Think Theism lectures are supported by Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, but the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and critical thought about challenging questions.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzqcN1uAH2A
Weekly Meeting 4/11/2024
It seems as if small changes in this universe’s basic features would have made life impossible. Does this point to divine design?
This lecture is from our 2024 Spring lecture series. For more information and resources go to https://tx.ag/RatioChristi
Spring 2024 slides and handouts: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1B8Z4KtRud-cxTKGYx5hunvt88iwviUXD
DISCLAIMER
Think Theism lectures are supported by Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, but the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and critical thought about challenging questions.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmRR4Sqzd14
Weekly meeting 2/22/2024
This video is from our 2024 Spring lecture series. For more information and resources go to tx.ag/RatioChristi
Spring 2024 slides and handouts: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1B8Z4KtRud-cxTKGYx5hunvt88iwviUXD
---------------------
DISCLAIMER
---------------------
Think Theism lectures are supported by Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, but the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and critical thought about challenging questions.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTrdcdPJvmo
Recorded September 11, 2016
Slides: https://ia601401.us.archive.org/33/items/green-2017-04-04-is-it-rational-to-believe-in-anything-other-than-science/Green-2016-09-11-ProblemofEvil.pdf
Disclaimer: Think Theism is an independent podcast produced in association with Ratio Christi TAMU. The opinions, perspectives, and beliefs expressed in individual episodes are those of the participants only and not necessarily a reflection of Ratio Christi nor Texas A&M University.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtjrDt1hmE8
What happens to those that never hear the message of Jesus? Wouldn't it be unfair of God to punish people for what they do not know? (Note: we had some audio difficulties with this recording. Audio from 0:00-0:59 is loud and audio at 20:00-22:00 is quiet).
This video is from our 2021 Fall lecture series responding to Gospel Objections. Each week, we evaluate a common objection to the core message of Jesus. For more information and resources go to http://rc-tamu.org/gospel-objections
Note: This video has been slightly edited for length and clarity.
DISCLAIMER: Think Theism lectures are supported by Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, but the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and critical thought about challenging questions.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RRHL7xHeGs
We discuss Alvin Plantinga's argument that evolution is in tension with naturalism. Below is the formal outline.
1. Given the truth of naturalism (N) and evolution (E), the probability that our cognitive faculties are reliable (R) is low. Symbolically: Pr(R|(N&E)) ≪ 1
2. The person who believes N&E (naturalism and evolution) and sees that Pr(R|(N&E)) is low has a defeater for R.
3. Anyone who has a defeater for R has a defeater for pretty much any other belief she has, including (if she believed it) N&E.
4. Therefore, the devotee of N&E (at least such a devotee who is aware of the truth of premise 1) has a self-defeating belief.
References
Seymour (2016). "Fossil skulls reveal that blood flow rate to the brain increased faster than brain volume during human evolution". http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/8/160305
Beilby, ed. (2002). Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism. https://books.google.com/books?id=p40tc_T7-rMC
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kom-Vly_904