Published By
Created On
17 Apr 2021 16:54:25 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
Survey/Odds/Polls: Mike Pence Won VP Debate ("Look a fly!" - MSM)
Hi, I’m Anthony Galli and as I wrote previously the true “winner” of a debate is whichever side sees a bump in their poll numbers after the debate. Since it’s too early to tell what the polls will say we are therefore left with political analysis.
I accurately predicted Joe Biden had won the first debate so which side do I think will see a bump from this debate?
First, let me use pollster Frank Luntz as my guide because I believe his live focus group with undecided voters is our best yet imperfect guide for gauging the views of undecideds. Here is how his focus group ranked each of the candidate’s performance in one word…
Frank Luntz concluded based on the overall response from his focus group…
Now before I continue, because this is often lost in our “just vote” culture, no, you shouldn’t vote based on personality. You should vote based on policy. This isn’t a pageant contest, but a job interview to decide who should run the most complicated and powerful political institution in human history. If you don’t want to take the time to learn what that job entails or learn basic facts about our government such as, what the 3 branches of government are, or cut through the political theater to understand what the pros and cons of each of the candidate’s policy positions are then, no, you shouldn’t vote because by doing so you are directly responsible for dumbing down our civic discourse and retarding our public institutions. Get informed and then vote!
Returning to reality, though, changes in poll numbers are often decided by persuading undecideds so based on that fact Mike Pence won. I wouldn’t say Vice President Pence, “wiped the floor with Harris,” but I do believe polls will move a bit in swing states like Michigan and Florida. Betting odds have already moved slightly in the Trump/Pence direction.
Mike Pence did what he needed to do whereby some of his “negatives” such as coming across to undecideds as “robotic, bland, typical politician” is arguably a net asset to counteract Trump’s unorthodoxy. For traditional evangelical conservatives or Bush Republicans sitting on the fence in Michigan and Florida, Mike Pence spoke their language and gave them a reason to hold their nose and vote Trump/Pence because if you could make your stereotypical 1980s Republican politician in a lab it would be Mike Pence. You can also tell Pence won by the fact that the headlines aren't saying "first black female VP nominee successfully prosecuted the case against white nationalism." Republicans also benefit more from “bland and boring” debates where the most commented aspect of the debate is something trivial like a fly in the room because this isn’t the sort of content that inspires high voter turnout, which tradition
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8fmguXjXvU
I accurately predicted Joe Biden had won the first debate so which side do I think will see a bump from this debate?
First, let me use pollster Frank Luntz as my guide because I believe his live focus group with undecided voters is our best yet imperfect guide for gauging the views of undecideds. Here is how his focus group ranked each of the candidate’s performance in one word…
Frank Luntz concluded based on the overall response from his focus group…
Now before I continue, because this is often lost in our “just vote” culture, no, you shouldn’t vote based on personality. You should vote based on policy. This isn’t a pageant contest, but a job interview to decide who should run the most complicated and powerful political institution in human history. If you don’t want to take the time to learn what that job entails or learn basic facts about our government such as, what the 3 branches of government are, or cut through the political theater to understand what the pros and cons of each of the candidate’s policy positions are then, no, you shouldn’t vote because by doing so you are directly responsible for dumbing down our civic discourse and retarding our public institutions. Get informed and then vote!
Returning to reality, though, changes in poll numbers are often decided by persuading undecideds so based on that fact Mike Pence won. I wouldn’t say Vice President Pence, “wiped the floor with Harris,” but I do believe polls will move a bit in swing states like Michigan and Florida. Betting odds have already moved slightly in the Trump/Pence direction.
Mike Pence did what he needed to do whereby some of his “negatives” such as coming across to undecideds as “robotic, bland, typical politician” is arguably a net asset to counteract Trump’s unorthodoxy. For traditional evangelical conservatives or Bush Republicans sitting on the fence in Michigan and Florida, Mike Pence spoke their language and gave them a reason to hold their nose and vote Trump/Pence because if you could make your stereotypical 1980s Republican politician in a lab it would be Mike Pence. You can also tell Pence won by the fact that the headlines aren't saying "first black female VP nominee successfully prosecuted the case against white nationalism." Republicans also benefit more from “bland and boring” debates where the most commented aspect of the debate is something trivial like a fly in the room because this isn’t the sort of content that inspires high voter turnout, which tradition
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8fmguXjXvU
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
English
More from the publisher
Controlling
VIDEO
GENER
general-george-s.-patton-how-to-never-be
If you want to be more memorable BUILD yourself into a symbol.
In business they call it a personal brand. BORING!
In politics they may label you a caricature. INSULTING!
Whereas symbols are the stuff of superheroes…
"As a man, I'm flesh and blood, I can be ignored, I can be destroyed; but as a symbol… I can be incorruptible, I can be everlasting." - Batman
And few men have become as much of a symbol as General George S. Patton Jr.
"Though I may walk in the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for I am the meanest motherf*cker in the valley." - Patton
Become a symbol by marching to the beat of Patton's steps…
1) What do you want? / Who do you want to be?
Since Patton was a boy he loved reading about the great heroes and battles of history and like most boys he saw himself between the lines.
"By perseverance, study, and eternal desire, any man can become great." - Patton
But unlike most boys, he literally saw himself in those battles because he believed he was the reincarnation of previous w*r heroes.
One day while walking along the beaches of Normandy, Patton turned to his future-wife and to her astonishment said that he had fought here before, "in a previous life," when the Roman legions came to conquer two thousand years ago, and that someday he would fight here again someday. Three decades later he would fulfill his prophesy.
In addition to his spirit, he also felt connected to the past through his blood.
When he went to Virginia Military Institute and was being fitting into his uniform, the old tailor told the young Patton that he had the exact same measurements as his father and grandfather.
2) Emphasize and deemphasize personality traits…
Then with a clear understanding of what he wanted and who he wanted to be, Patton began to cultivate his image.
"For Patton, leadership was never simply about making plans and giving orders, it was about transforming oneself into a symbol" - Alan Axelrod, historian
At V.M.I. he decided to no longer smile because he believed it was unbecoming a serious military man. Instead he would practice his "w*r face" in front of the mirror.
To further capture the essence of who he wanted to be he wrote down "Characteristics of a cavalry leader" in a notebook he kept…
1. indomitable courage 2. quick perception of the right moment to attack 3. capacity of inspiring confidence in troops 4. always work like Hell at all things and all times.
He especially cultivated his courage (although one may say it's a fine line between courage and stupidity).
While students were practicing their shot, Patton would walk out and stand between the targets. When word got out to his mother, his mother was told he was attempting suicide, but George reassured her that he just wanted to see what it f
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UH_TCsgnZ3I
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
THE S
the-sassy-trucker-saga
Why the Sassy Trucker was detained and how we can encourage free speech abroad while also better regulating obscene speech here at home.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvpgqZC-ty8
Transaction
Created
9 months ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
THE D
the-descent-of-american-culture-yg-in
There’s a part of me that thinks "YG - In the Dark" is dope. My first and only car was a Ford Focus so I chuckled at the line… "Loaded. Losing my Focus. Need a b*tch and a Benz. Not a Ford Focus."
But there’s another part of me that thinks the song’s misogynistic, materialistic, hedonistic, and juvenile.
I like my b*tches dark. I hit them at the park when it’s dark.
I guess my view is that this sort of content should be age-restricted on YouTube to reduce its mainstream appeal.
But not only does Big Tech not censor such music for children, but recently Apple used it for its jingle in their new iPhone commercial.
I think it’s a clever ad and at least they cut out the more offensive lines, but it’s because they used the song that it has gained new popularity among impressionable teenagers.
Pop up on ya b*tch like peek a boo.
The culture has moved so far to the left that it’s easy to be considered a social conservative nowadays because you can basically be against killing an 8-month old baby or in favor of giving your daughter a doll and BOOM you’re a conservative transphobic misogynist!
Face down, *ss up, back gotta be arched.
If Google, Apple, and Facebook censored profane songs on their platforms then creators would be financially incentivized to tone it down a bit or create a more censored alternative version for children.
Here’s my attempt at rewriting the song for the kids:
YG: Loaded. Losing my Focus. Need a b*tch and a Benz. Not a Ford Focus.
AG: Loaded. Losing my Focus. Need a hitch and a Benz. Not a Ford Focus.
YG: I like my b*tches dark. I hit them at the park when it’s dark.
AG: I hate my ditches dark. I fall in them at the park when it’s dark.
YG: Face down, *ss up, back gotta be arched.
AG: Face down, pass up, test gotta be marked.
YG: Pop up on ya b*tch like peek a boo.
AG: Pop up on the rich like peek a boo.
YG: I do a b*tch harsh. Break her heart to a thousand parts.
AG: I teach a niche harsh. Make her smart in a thousand parts.
Or I suppose you could just omit the curse words, but some leftists might call me a hypocrite because, “What about free speech?”
For one, I’d argue it’s BECAUSE I believe in free speech that I support censoring profanity/vulgarity. I think vulgarity dumbs down our culture by superficializing our thinking, therefore, making it easier for the influence-industrial complex to censor complex thinking. In other words, “bread and circuses” is a distraction from tyranny, which is why Big Tech not only doesn’t censor such content, but actively promotes it while censoring more substantive content for wrongthink.
But more importantly, I’d argue society should treat children differently. What a radical notion?! In addition, age-restricting videos isn’t particu
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAym7DrOKNI
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
IT'S
it's-better-to-debate-this...
In this video we explore how to break free from arguing in a circle and how to ultimately go about finding common ground in the real-world.
In any political discussion I always prefer to speak about BEHAVIORS and POLICIES rather than BELIEFS and TERMS.
Because here’s the thing…
With a belief it’s easier for a person to shift their position, to demonize my own position, and then for us to just end up talking past each other…
(its better to debate policy in politics)
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL3Hlqf-XsM
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
WHY G
why-georgism-is-wrong-(part-2)
In this video I explore critiques of my previous Georgist video: https://youtu.be/BnWX4WZzs9w
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zeCI9XqDYw
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
WHY S
why-some-leftists-will-not-vote-for-joe
Here’s my honest, fair assessment on why some Bernie supporters will not vote for Joe Biden…
First, let’s start with Kyle Kulinski’s rationale because he’s arguably the most influential Bernie supporter with millions of followers between Twitter and YouTube.
When it comes to current events, many leftist arguments originate with him. He said he will not vote for Joe Biden because Joe Biden doesn’t support at least one-of-his-top-five-positions: “Medicare for All, free college, living wage, ending the wars, and UBI.”
If Joe Biden supported one of those positions then Kyle Kulinski said he’d vote for him in 2020.
Kyle Kulinski’s view is that he doesn’t want to keep rewarding the Democratic party with his vote because it signals to the party that they can continue to ignore leftist demands while taking leftist support for granted.
But what is better? If Joe Biden gave 10%, 10%, 10%, 10%, 100% on each of those positions, or if he gave 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%?
With the latter, leftists are getting more of their agenda through even though Joe Biden fails their ideological purity test on each issue.
The truth is that Joe Biden is overall the most leftist Democratic nominee in American history with a running mate who has a Senate voting record further left than Bernie Sanders therefore many centrist Democrats believe they have moved far enough left to satisfy the leftist wing of the party.
After all, some of the things Biden/Harris are running on are a $15 minimum wage, free public college for families making under $125,000, a universal housing voucher program, a public option, a $2 trillion dollar green energy plan, a $775 billion plan for caregiving, and a $700 billion “made in America” plan. Biden’s plans come to at least $10 trillion, which is three times the cost of what Hillary Clinton proposed in 2016.
“You know what, Joe Biden will become the most progressive president since Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And that, in this moment, is what we need.” — Bernie Sanders
But a lot of leftists who are persuaded by that platform still won’t vote for Joe Biden, somewhat paradoxically to Kyle Kulinski’s desire, because they feel he compromises too much!
It’s not good enough he holds those positions today he should have held them 10 years ago!
This is why even if Joe Biden did support Medicare-for-All there are still many on the left who wouldn’t vote for him because they don’t think he’d actually fight for it.
I think this is a fair critique given that in Joe Biden’s previous presidential runs and throughout his long Senatorial career he was known more of as a centrist bipartisan backslapper by supporting such policies as a federal spending freeze and a balanced budget amendment.
Ultimately, many l
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha5-RQGMT8s
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
HOW T
how-to-become-the-hardest-worker-in-the
Hi I’m Anthony Galli and if you haven’t lived under a rock then you’ve probably heard of The Rock. Here’s a man who wakes up at 4am to workout…

Runs around all day from movie set to wrestling ring…

And then still makes time for his family…

I couldn’t help but wonder… what makes the most electrifying man in the world so electrified?
According to him the BIG reason is…
“The thing that works for me is to remember the hard times… so before a big movie comes out, before a Wrestlemania match, before anything BIG that would happen I would always take a moment and I would just remind myself: I was evicted when I was 14, kicked off the island of Hawaii, had no place to live, arrested multiple times in Nashville before I was 16 years old. I remember that! And it allows me to then be present in the moment and think holy sh*t the stuff I have around me right now this is the sh*t that I dreamed of when I was a kid. I am here!”
It’s this sort of negative-past-reviving that energizes him to layeth the Smackdown on your candy*ss…

According to Dr. Mirgain, “We have a choice in how we respond to difficult times. We can SHUT DOWN emotionally and let ourselves become hardened by it, or we can GROW from the experience.”
This psychological term is called post-traumatic growth.
We often see it portrayed in the movies where the good guy experiences a massive setback, but rather than give up he reconceptualizes the failure as a lesson and a motivator to then go out and just bring it!

But some people argue it’s better to “let go”, “move on”, and “take the rock off your back”... for the past can be too much of a weight to bear.
All the tragedy and trauma of your distant past no longer exists except in your mind so you have a choice: lock arms with your past or give it the ol’ people’s elbow.
So why do some people decide to let go of their past, specifically their painful past?
1. Some people let go because their own mind breaks from the trauma by actually suppressing the memory, but "break” probably isn’t the best word because your mind is trying to make you forget so you can function, but long-term the underlying pain will often emerge as a mental illness like Schizophrenia or Border-line Personality Disorder.
2. Other people decide not to think about their painful past because they recognize that constantly reliving trauma doesn’t make them happy. You might even say, it DOES matter what you think! They rather focus on the present and the positive and there's a lot of research to suggest that focusing on what you're grateful for and living in the present makes you happier. If you ever wandered into a Nursing Home you’ll see that the happiest people there are often the ones with Alzheime
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXbsaLAGzDo
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
WHAT
what-is-the-best-inflation-rate
The Fed targets 2% price inflation. Why? Is there a better target? Let's explore.
You can read my essays at https://www.anthonygalli.com/.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXrc01LYnjA
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
LEFTI
leftists-don't-care-about-helping-the
I don’t think America should go to war just to save people from oppression. I think there needs to be additional parameters, such as America being attacked first.
But nonetheless, I wonder... where are the idealists? Where are the people who say, “We are all human!” “I want to make the world a better place!”
If that’s your philosophy and objective then why aren’t you supportive of fighting to protect human rights — regardless of nationality?
There’s a justifiable distrust of our military-industrial complex, but that doesn’t mean our might hasn’t and can’t be used for good. Where are the idealists who say, “Never again!” in reference to today’s genocides — Rohingya in Myanmar, Nuer in South Sudan, Yazidis in Syria, Christians in the Central African Republic, Darfuris in Sudan, Uyghur in China? I hear your silence.
Are you the type of person who stands up to bullies? Do you do what’s fair even if it goes against your self-interest? If a husband hits his wife would you say, “Oh, that’s none of my business! She chose to be with him.” And yet when a government abuses its people so many people say, “Oh, but who are we to judge? We got our own problems!”
If “we’re all human” as the slogan indicates then imagine being an Iraqi boy who witnessed his family gassed to death for simply being the wrong type of Muslim. Wouldn’t you wish for someone, anyone, even an American, to swoop in and save you from the genocidal maniac Saddam Hussein?
Where are the idealists?
I think they’ve been squashed into an ever polarizing political spectrum. On the right, we have a mix of non-interventionists, neoconservatives, and an “America First” approach to trade. A more idealistic approach to foreign policy would have traditionally fallen on the left as exemplified by President Woodrow Wilson’s entrance into WW1 and fight for the League of Nations…
But today there’s virtually no young leftists arguing for foreign intervention because by extension they’d have to view America as a potential source of good, which of course, is a no, no. They’d have to point out the multitude of times America used its might for what’s right, which is blasphemy to the followers of Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky.
There’s a lot we could do that doesn’t require all-out war, such as increasing sanctions on totalitarian states and providing oppressed people with information via pamphlet drops and breaking down censorship. Let freedom ring, ring, ring! Hello? This is a Public Service Announcement from the U.S. Government informing you that you can get free food and water at our nearby military facility.
Joe Biden’s foreign policy platform doesn’t even mention the word “genocide” and is likely to be similar to the Obam
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5i6nj_9cW4
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English