One of the big problems looming on the horizon is that a smaller and smaller portion of the American population will have more and more power. This is because of how our U.S. constitution was designed. In 1789, there was a compromise between big states and small states known as the “Connecticut Compromise” where the U.S. legislative branch would consist of a bicameral legislature: House of Representatives and Senate. The House of Representatives appealed to big states because since congressional seats would be proportionally allocated this meant more populated states would get more congressmen whereas the Senate appealed to small states because every state regardless of size would get two senators. This worked for the United States of America when power was largely decentralized to the states and where in 1790 the smallest state Delaware had 60,000 people and the biggest state Virginia was just 12 times bigger with 692,000 people. But now the smallest state Wyoming has 600,000 people and the biggest state California is 66 times bigger with 40 million people. This population inequality will only grow. People are being pushed into cities, specifically big cities in big states. How will American politics change when 90% of the U.S. population lives in 3 - 5 states? This will give an enormous amount of power to the less populated rural states, i.e. countryfolk and rich businessmen! (political problem facing the united states of america in the future, what is the biggest problem facing america, political problem facing the united states of america, problem facing the united states of america, end of democracy in america) We already see this play out in the U.S. Senate where the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell from Kentucky is an interesting mix of anti-government, except when it benefits big business, big agriculture, and the military-industrial complex. The only way to change the U.S. constitution is with a constitutional amendment, which requires two-thirds support in the House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, and state legislatures, in other words since the small states will never vote to give up their power there’s virtually no political solution to this looming problem. On the plus side, I’m a federalist, constitutionalist, small-government conservative so I like the idea that the U.S. Senate will be able to keep our more socialist impulses in check. But population inequality taken to the extreme will create an undemocratic America, which should alarm any good American whose a lowercase republican and democrat. Now although there’s no political solution, there is a demographic one! I’ve written about this many times, but I believe the U.S. government should increase taxes on large estates (to discourage the hoardi ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp1ACYNRClY

How will the coronavirus outbreak end? I see the pandemic going through four main stages… 1. SOCIAL-DISTANCING The more we keep our distance the slower the virus will spread (Outbreak Simulator). Stay at home as much as possible. Wipe down surfaces. Keep 6 foot distance from people. I honestly wouldn’t judge you if you strapped yourself to a social-distancing donut. 2. TESTING We are starting to transition into this stage (social distancing still required). One of today’s positive news stories is that we’re starting to see Drive-thru coronavirus testing sites pop up across the United States. ‘Merica! 3. ZONES As the numbers come down, we may see the creation of “restricted zones”. In a month or so when a sizable enough portion of a population in a city/town/region test negative for the coronavirus then it’d be wise to label that area “corona-free” therefore allowing businesses to gradually reopen there. In order to keep the zone “corona-free” they could have troops and police guarding the zone’s perimeters whereby for people to be allowed to enter they’d have to undergo testing. With the Governor of California stating today that 56% of Californians could get the Coronavirus then I believe Governors from states with single-digit cases such as Alaska (9), Montana (9), and West Virginia (2) should lock down their borders. Once the “corona-free” zones increase in geographical size, we could then see it flip and we’ll just have “quarantined” zones where the troops won’t be their to keep you out, but instead to keep you in. 4. VACCININATION The end game depends on a vaccine. Experts say we are potentially 18 MONTHS AWAY FROM A VACCINE, which the vaccine will come with its own risks because usually vaccines take a DECADE to go from development to manufacturing so by fast-tracking the process we could end up with a vaccine with a lot of side-effects. I remain optimistic though in this area because there’s so much bureaucracy surrounding the normal process that I think with growing international pressure on our governments we’ll see a vaccine distributed in at least some countries sometime in 2020. CONCLUSION According to one study 86% of people with the virus are walking around undetected. This could be YOU. If so all you have to do is breathe in my direction or touch a cardboard box and I'll get it too. The true severity of the illness is also unknown. According to one report, 2 out of 3 survivors saw a 20% to 30% drop in lung function. Don’t stress too much on this point because it’s only based on a sample size of 12 survivors and overtime you could regain some of your lung capacity through cardiovascular activity, but nonetheless this report as well as reports coming out of Europe is that this vi ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQSRHmVdtdI