Language. It’s as if each one of us would be given a box and we would refer to the thing that’s in the box as a “beetle”, but we could never peek into other people’s boxes and neither could they peek into ours. So, when we say “beetle”, how do we know that we’re talking about the same thing?
Philosophy of Language playlist:
https://bit.ly/2LkHSySThis is the 8th lecture on my Philosophy of Language series. Last time we talked about Ludwig Wittgenstein's notion of Language Games and how it can help us understand language. Today we're looking at Wittgenstein's consideration of the possibility of a private language, a language that is in principle incomprehensible to others. Can we ever truly understand each other?
Video references:
Wittgenstein's Paradox:
https://youtu.be/jHbwr853DSULanguage Games:
https://youtu.be/_keugfsxRR8"What It's Like Having No Inner Monologue and Aphantasia"
https://youtu.be/8tQ2KcOhHiULiterature:
Ludwig Wittgenstein, (1953). "Philosophical Investigations, §243-301"
David Chalmers (1996). “The Conscious Mind”
Alan Turing (1950). "Computing Machinery and Intelligence"
B. F. Skinner, (1969). “Contingencies of Reinforcement: A Theoretical Analysis”
B. Ross, (2016). "Aphantasia: How It Feels To Be Blind In Your Mind"
M. Merleau-Ponty, (1943). “The World of Perception, §5”
If you want to support me, fuel me with green tea: ?
https://www.paypal.me/bebeflapula ?
Additional tags: philosophical zombie, solipsism, dualism, Turing test, paradox.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xc3QMog4xxo