You know it really pisses me off when asshats tell me I am stealing her material. The internet was created first and foremost for the free flow of information. Charging for news is anti-American. What information provider would want to seriously hinder more people--not less people-- seeing their news? Secondly it was understood by Wallstreet ad firms long ago that the more people subjected to information, results in more people becoming a consumer of the material. Take Napster for example, rock bands were scared to death they would lose revenue. The opposite happened in that more people heard it and became fans and bought live ticket events, posters, albums, T-shirts-- If Kim embraced people sharing her material she would see people wearing her face on their shirts and more people getting behind her, rather than just detractors. Trying to limit viewership makes one very suspicious of her goals. Besides all of this, I as an individual who wants truth and justice am compelld to follow my instincts and my freedom to put some effort into sharing her news and many others... A couple of you are nasty narrow minded asshats. So I make mistakes like accidentally leaving a second microphone open... so what? I appreciate the heads up but calling me a "pig" because I cough and make other sounds a 62 year old man with congestive heart failure makes is just too bad isn't it? I pay her subscription fee and don't capture nonsense... just the parts that are intriguing.

A bit of musical chairs with the soundtrack. Something that likely only matters to me but promotional material should intrigue and not deter.