Author: Douglas C. Baynton
File Type: pdf
Immigration history has largely focused on the restriction of immigrants by race and ethnicity, overlooking disability as a crucial factor in the crafting of the image of the undesirable immigrant. Defectives in the Land, Douglas C. Bayntons groundbreaking new look at immigration and disability, aims to change this. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Baynton explains, immigration restriction in the United States was primarily intended to keep people with disabilitiesknown as defectivesout of the country. The list of those included is long the deaf, blind, epileptic, and mobility impaired people with curved spines, hernias, flat or club feet, missing limbs, and short limbs those unusually short or tall people with intellectual or psychiatric disabilities intersexuals men of poor physique and men diagnosed with feminism. Not only were disabled individuals excluded, but particular races and nationalities were also identified as undesirable based on their supposed susceptibility to mental, moral, and physical defects. In this transformative book, Baynton argues that early immigration laws were a cohesive wholea decades-long effort to find an effective method of excluding people considered to be defective. This effort was one aspect of a national culture that was increasingly fixated on competition and efficiency, anxious about physical appearance and difference, and haunted by a fear of hereditary defect and the degeneration of the American race. **Review Baynton, challenging the conventional historiography, argues that the selective phase of American immigration policy, despite its heavy reliance on the sensible-sounding public charge standard, was no less discriminatory. During those years, he demonstrates, immigration officials could and did customarily invoke this standard to rule out such defectives as women unaccompanied by male providers and members of races with supposed predispositions to criminality. Even those with objective physical impairments (as the Americans with Disabilities Act would underscore many years later) were incapable of work only if you made certain assumptions about how workplaces were to be structured. So beware reasonable justifications for immigration policies, Baynton warns. (New York Times) Focusing on immigrant experiences in New York, Baynton explains how ideas about genetics, disability, race, family life, and employment worked together to exclude an extraordinarily diverse range of men and women from the shores of the US. (New Scientist) In Defectives in the Land, Baynton extends his groundbreaking inquiries into how weve arrived at what we think of as disability in contemporary America. Bayntons is an elegant and incisive analysis of the ways our developing nation evolved cultural practices and attitudes to make disability a concept that gave meaning and status to people who have illnesses, industrial injuries, military wounds, or simply the unexpected forms of human variation life presents. Baynton presents us with the familiar history of American modernization as the creation of modern disability, showing us the shifting criteria for what counts a human defect and what that means in the lives of people who bear such stigma. (Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, Emory University) A well-researched, original, and engaging study. Baynton argues that historians of North American immigration have failed to appreciate the importance of disability in the web of immigration restriction. To correct this failure, he maintains that disability joined race, disease, poor physique, and poverty to form the ingredients of degeneracy. Beautifully written and based on rigorous scholarship, Defectives in the Land will be of great importance and interest to historians of immigration and disabilityand beyond. (James W. Trent, Gordon College) Defectives in the Landis a supple example of the ways that disability has never been a term with a singular or unified meaning, but a term that has beenand continues to bemisused, abused, and exploited by a range of historical actors and institutions for their own ends. By using deliberately loaded conceptual categoriesdefective,handicapped,ugly,dependentto organize his chapters, Bayntons book opens up the deep interrelationships between disability and familiar analytical categories within immigration history, social history, and political history. (David Serlin, University of California, San Diego) About the Author Douglas C. Baynton is professor of history at the University of Iowa, where he also teaches courses in the American Sign Language program. He is the author of Forbidden Signs American Culture and the Campaign against Sign Language, also published by the University of Chicago Press. He lives in Iowa.