Le 27 février 2024 ℹ️ Dans cette 2ème émission du COS, le Dr Laurence Kayser reçoit le collectif Next Dose qui reviendra sur ses principales observations des injections expérimentales. Ils mettront en lumière le lien entre le graphène et la microtechnologie au regard des dernières études scientifiques sur le sujet. Un invité important, car spécialisé en fabrication de microsystèmes, nous donnera un éclairage sur les possibilités actuelles de la technologie dans l'infiniment petit. Une émission à ne rater sous aucun prétexte ! ? Télégram du COS : https://t.me/COSscience ? Site internet Next Dose : https://www.nextdose.fr/ ? Télégram Next Dose : https://t.me/next_dose_officiel ? Dr Pablo Campra, La Quinta Columna : https://www.laquintacolumna.info ? Dominique Guillet, Xochipelli : https://xochipelli.fr ? Traduction par Xochipelli des travaux de Mik Andersen, Corona2Inspect : https://xochipelli.fr/category/graphene/mikeandersen/ ? Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea : https://substack.com/@anamihalceamdphd ? Dr David Nixon : https://drdavidnixon.com Sources AKINA https://crowdbunker.com/v/FQuydvSL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw9gJElv-0Y

ATTENTION : RECTIFICATION: J'ai commis une erreur d'interprétation à 29:05 mn , Anne-Marie Yim n'a aucun lien avec la Eisenhower Fellowship, la phrase indiquait seulement qu'elle est une consoeur en tant que scientifique. Les imputations faites reposent toutes sur des faits qui sont connus ou des documents qui peuvent être produits, et le seront certainement. Ces documents, pour la plupart, sont déjà publics. Sac de noeuds, langues de vipères, séductions et faux-semblants... ce monde est démoniaque, non? L'original du dossier de E. Mugabo ici: https://news.oddr.biz/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/AHC.pdf RECTIFICATION: J'ai commis une erreur d'interprétation à 29:05 mn , Anne-Marie Yim n'a aucun lien avec la Eisenhower Fellowship, la phrase indiquait seulement qu'elle est une consoeur en tant que scientifique. Une e-mission proposée par Prune J'ACCEPTE LES DONS, surtout en nature, sinon: https://www.paypal.me/pruneprune (MERCI de faire figurer la mention "DON D'USAGE" dans le libellé si possible) AINSI que les chèques - Adresse postale de liaison : communiquée par courriel, merci Adresse de contact: ledito@protonmail.com Prune sur Crowd: https://crowdbunker.com/@pruneDePrune https://crowdbunker.com/@LeditoDePrune https://crowdbunker.com/@pruneLive Prune sur YT: Prune de Prune 2 : https://www.youtube.com/@prunedeprune Prune de secours : https://www.youtube.com/@prunedesecou... Prune de Prune - LES ARCHIVES : https://www.youtube.com/@LES-ARCHIVES... Prune sur Odysee: https://odysee.com/@leditodeprune:9 https://odysee.com/@nouslepeuple!:0

Le Dr David Nixon revient sur ses observations dans les injections C0VlD, le sang (injecté ou non) et d'autres produits pharmaceutiques. Traduit par JDLM : https://www.bitchute.com/channel/qFIJ1x6xxMbr/ https://nitter.net/NicolasPichot6 Dr David Nixon : https://substack.com/@davidnixon Vidéo source : https://www.bitchute.com/video/CGKWdWb1YzJI/

September 3, 2021 Orwell City - Orwellito - La Quinta Columna - Dr. Pablo Campra https://www.orwell.city/2021/09/official-response.html Since Dr. Pablo Campra published the official preliminary report of the analysis he carried out on a Pfizer vaccination vial, the attacks against him and La Quinta Columna haven't ceased. Certain individuals and groups have gone to great lengths to discredit his work, even arguing that what he has found 'isn't graphene oxide but polyethylene glycol.' The saddest part of the situation is that collectives that call themselves 'For the Truth' are some of those who try to discredit the finding that's impossible to counter because it's real. The false dissidence and the globalist media have tried everything to make people believe that the analysis is fake, but their 'arguments' are increasingly weak and easily countered. Orwell City brings the official statement emitted by Dr. Pablo Campra through La Quinta Columna a few hours ago into English. - - - Ricardo Delgado: This is what Dr. Campra has shared. You see his digital signature down here. So, everything here in this communiqué is under his name. 'Comment on the hypothesis of microscopy identification of polyethylene glycol in the sample as COMIRNATY RD1' RD1 = Ricardo Delgado Martin. That's the sample that I sent. This is signed by Dr. Pablo Campra. This statement alludes to certain individuals who have shared a photograph to question, with some lack of scientific rigor. And the saddest part is that it has been shared in both forums and channels of Biologists for Truth. Now we understand the degree of ignorance and lack of knowledge of certain groups. To this, Dr. Campra responds: 'The proponents of the hypothesis don't present original observations nor do they provide bibliographic reference of the photograph presented to evaluate the hypothesis. Both polyethylene glycol and sucrose are part of the composition of the product, according to the manufacturer. But they cannot be identified by microscopy.' Dr. Campra made it very clear in the preliminary report itself. They're swept with hexane. Those elements disappear from the sample, OK? Both the PEG (the polyethylene glycol) and the sucrose. Let's be clear. 'According to the manufacturer, PEG would be part, along with 3 other lipids of the outer membrane of the lipid nanoparticles. A membrane that, in theory, was disintegrated when the aqueous phase was separated with hexane.' You'll see the illustration sent by Dr. Campra later. 'The polyethylene glycol molecules remain dissolved in the aqueous phase without forming any membrane observable under the microscope. The aqueous phase of the COMIRNATY RD1 sample showed the main signal corresponding to sucrose when scanned in Raman (NMR). However, when evaluating only the components, only the components of the aqueous fraction showed ultraviolet absorption. A maximum of 270 nm was detected, which is compatible with the trace of the genetic material (RNA), graphene, and many other substances with chromophore groups, which don't include sucrose, which has...' Let's look now at the other page. '...a different peak at 197 nm...' That is, there was no sucrose or PEG because they were dissolved, '...which doesn't show absorption to ultraviolet radiation. Of this absorbance, 270 nm, only a minimal part can be ascribed to RNA at 1%. The substance or substances responsible for this absorption haven't been definitively characterized by spectroscopy.' Yes. All the rest is assumed to be the fashionable material we know. 'The sample also showed fluorescence at 340 nm compatible with graphene and other substances but not with sucrose or PEG. PEG doesn't show UV absorption because it has no active chromophore group for UV absorption unless some are added, such as metallic particles. Polyethylene glycol molecules cannot be observed under the electron microscope unless they're functionalized with opaque nanoparticles such as metals. The numerous 2D lamellar objects observable in the sample don't correspond to any PEG image or derivative seen in the literature. The definitive identification of the observable 2D objects in the sample by optical and electron microscopy (TEM), which were the ones that most characterized from the point of view that it was graphene, requires structural characterization by obtaining specific spectroscopic and/or diffraction patterns.' He said this today, September 2, 2021. OK. Now I want you to look at this. This is what a certain individual has sent in saying... Here's our graphene sample, the black mesh. Now, you're going to see what the black mesh is, and here you see a fold like a handkerchief, which is what is identified as graphene. However, this individual has put polyethylene glycol here, see? And now I want you guys to look at this. I'm zooming it in. The mesh. It's a carbon mesh used as a carrier so objects can be imaged in the transmission electron microscope. ...