October 6th 1980 article from Der Spiegel A report by the Federal Criminal Police Office proves that the "Diary of Anne Frank" was subsequently edited. The authenticity of the document was thus further called into question. https://www.spiegel.de/politik/blaue-paste-a-38ec327f-0002-0001-0000-000014317313?context=issue Translation below. A report by the Federal Criminal Police Office proves that the "Diary of Anne Frank" was subsequently edited. The authenticity of the document was thus further called into question. Otto Frank, a Jewish merchant from Frankfurt, fled with his family from the Nazis to Amsterdam in 1933. When the Germans conquered Holland, the emigrants managed to hide. Then, in 1944, Hitler's helpers also transported the Franks to the concentration camp. Only the father survived. The diary in which daughter Anne traced the years in hiding in the Secret Annex and which was published after the war has been one of the moving personal testimonies of victims of the persecution of the Jews ever since. The »Diary of Anne Frank« became world famous in translations, in the theater and in the film version. On Broadway, the critic of The New Yorker, like millions with him, found himself "torn through a dam of tears." It is therefore not surprising that Nazi supporters tried to denounce the work. Hamburg pensioner Ernst Römer, 76, was in the darkest of company when he spread the view that the diary was a fake. And like other like-minded people, he ended up in court, reported by Otto Frank. Römer's first instance was no different than usual from previous cases. The judges had always joined the experts, who confirmed the authenticity of the writings, primarily based on manuscript studies and style comparisons. Römer's second instance, however, will provide new material for the abusers. In order to secure the date of origin of the Anne Frank work, the Hamburg district court called in the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA). Surprising result: Some of the insertions written in the original, which were previously always considered to have the same typeface as the rest of the text, are written with ballpoint paste and thus date from after 1951 -- the year the ballpoint pen was introduced. Viewed against this result, earlier written reports would even suggest that all the entries were only made after 1950, and that the "diary" as a whole is therefore not authentic. The Hamburg graphologist Minna Becker, for example, stated in 1960 on the occasion of another defamation trial before the »Übecker district court, the unity of the entire legacy: » » The script of the diary entries in the three fixed » » books -- Tgb. I, II and III - including all » » notes and additions on the sticky notes in » » Tgb I as well as the handwriting on the 338 pages of the loose » » tissue paper sheets - LB - including all improvements and additions made on these » » are identical to the » » handwriting of Anne Frank. But if the handwriting of the original notes were identical to the typeface of the insertions, p.122, an inventor must have been at work -- which, of course, not even Frank's enemies wanted to claim in court and which, in view of the disputed probative value of graphology, is not even now can seriously be asserted. The thrust of the Nazi propagandists mostly aimed beyond Anne Frank's diary -- at the discrediting of all educational work against the Nazi Reich. The opponents of the diary always claimed to serve the "truth about the persecution of the Jews" or, like a leaflet distributor in the Roman trial, to want to put an end to "the gas chamber fraud." The English contemporary historian David Irving also described Anne Frank's diary as a "fake" that had been "on record". The idiosyncratic Irving, who once advocated the thesis that Hitler knew nothing about concentration camps, was taken in by a misunderstanding that was widespread on the right. According to the legend that is often cited, a New York screenwriter was able to prove in court that father Otto Frank wrote quotes from the film in his diary; what was actually proven, however, was that he had transplanted parts of the first screenplay for the Anne Frank film, written by the American plaintiff, into a second script written by other authors. Frank had to pay damages for this, but Irving's publisher had to withdraw the allegation of forgery. What is certain, however, is that what moved the world did not always come from Anne Frank's hand. When it was published, the diary was altered by numerous manipulations. An original version was never published. Instead, the editors, Otto Frank, who died in the middle of this year, developed an over-commitment that can probably only be explained by the difficult circumstances of the time. After his return from Auschwitz in 1945, Otto Frank had received his daughter's notes that had been saved by neighbors in Amsterdam -- three volumes of diaries, one volume each with short stories and quotations, and notes on 324 l

Jordan Peterson Dismantled.. Jordan Peterson is former employee of the UN who helped draft globalist documents and legislation on Resilient People, Resilient Planet, the report of the UN Secretary General’s High Level Panel on Global Sustainability.. What I find most damning about Peterson is that he worked at the United Nations from 2009 until 2012 for George Soros’ protégé Jim Balsillie. He helped write a communist document that outlined how the Western world’s wealth must be redistributed to the Third World. The document also championed mass Third world immigration to the West. So much for opposing cultural Marxism. This video completely exposes Peterson's anti-White agenda and his strategy for implementing it. Any Peterson fans who are not beyond saving will be deprogrammed by watching this video. Jordan Peterson's primary goal is to neutralize the political right and White identity. He does not care about the Marxist take over of our nations, in fact he was hired by the United Nations to help usher it along. Peterson's only reason for stepping into the limelight was because he saw a massive right wing backlash fomenting, and realized it was going to destroy the left. His job is to implement "plan B", to steer the rising tide of nationalism into an impotent cul-de-sac of centrist individualism, giving our enemies just enough time to tip the demographic balance of our countries so that our destruction is sealed. Peterson is explicitly targeting young White males for indoctrination with an insidious political ideology he calls radical individualism. He has created a pseudo-religion self-help cult; he is delivering his ideology to the disaffected youth by combining it with a self-help regimen wrapped in empty religious metaphor. While our enemies are working tirelessly to destroy our nations in a ruthlessly calculated and organized fashion, Jordan Peterson is brainwashing a generation of young White men to be atomized individuals who perceive group cooperation based on ethnic identity and nationality as the height of evil. And in the process of doing so, Peterson and his friends are making untold millions of dollars. https://zigforums.com/thread/11591082/politics/jordan-b-peterson-s-connections-to-the-un-soros.html https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/8kgr6w/jordan_peterson_wrote_for_the_united_nations/ https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2018/05/jordan-peterson-is-globalist-shill.html “The following is strictly an effort on my part to document with appropriate links the fact that Jordan Peterson is an UN Globalist shill and is connected to George Soros and other Globalist figures. According to The Report of the United Nations Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel On Global Sustainability PDF: The UN Secretary-General established in 2010 the High-level Panel on Global Sustainability (GSP) in order to formulate a new blueprint for sustainable development and low-carbon prosperity. Members included: • Kevin Rudd (Minister for Foreign affairs and former Prime Minister of Australia), • Susan E. Rice (permanent representative to the United Nations and member of the cabinet of the president of the United States), • Yukio Hatoyama (Member of the House of Representatives and former Prime Minister of Japan), • James Balsillie (Chair of the Board of the Centre for International Governance Innovation, Canada, and former Co-Chief Executive Officer of Research in Motion). Balsillie is also the founder of CIGI(Centre for International Governance Innovation) which is in partnership with the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET), an organization founded by George Soros. • Jordan Peterson was the advisor for Balsillie while he was working on the Panel, as stated in the Report (see page 93 of the PDF). Peterson’s co-advisors were, Paul Jenkins and Simon Zadek of CIGI. And Balsillie’s “sherpa” was David Runnalls of CIGI. In an interview with The Dark Room Podcast, Peterson stated: “I worked on the UN Secretary-General's High Panel for Sustainability Report that was delivered, I believe, in 2013, and rewrote the underlying narrative to strip out most of the ideological claptrap” Documentation • https://en.unesco.org/system/files/GSP_Report_web_final.pdf • https://hooktube.com/watch?v=8KUnK_Nz1ws (skip to 1m:9s for Peterson’s statement.) • https://archive.fo/URj3H (Jenkins) • https://archive.fo/DzhJT (Zadek) • https://archive.fo/XGz1q (Runnalls) • https://archive.fo/4ceJI (Balsillie) • https://archive.fo/uJfQa (Partnership info) Norman Doidge, a Canadian-born psychiatrist and famous author, is the man who wrote the foreword for Peterson's new book 12 Rules for Life. He is friends with Jim Balsillie, has done a public discussion with him, and he has an article on CIGI's website. This suggests that Doidge is also part the NWO cadre. https://www.alor.org/blog/index.php/jordan-peterson-s-dismantling-by-paul-walker