http://CynLibSoc.com Stating The Obvious #134 -- Anarchy would mean gangs roaming the streets and killing people. Or would it? Part 1 of 2 What's in part 1? A few follow ups on the last Stating The Obvious. Yes more about women and how their ethics and morals take second place to their desire to conform and obey. Leaving fish out in the sun because they have no compassion. "I will run over bicyclist because it says I can in the Colorado driver's manual" because obeying and selfishness is more important than not killing. Knowing your friends will kill you when it's convenient for them to do so is why the truth will not "set you free". Watching Batman and it's take on anarchy, or what you would call anarchy. In an anarcho-capitalist society would "gangs of criminals lead by warlords" roam the streets and rule the world? And how would this be different that what we have now? If the government prevents crime why do we have crime? Notice how the State shuts down the ability of people to think. What if you said "please watch my computer while I go to the bathroom" and when you came back you discovered someone had stolen your computer and so I asked you for more money. That's the State. We need more laws to prevent school shootings, yet killing people is already illegal. The "three laws away from perfection" falicy. If the State were to shut down there would be no government and no corporations. Who would buy tanks? Who would build tanks? Who would maintain tanks? Who would operate a Nimitz class aircraft carrier? (my lizard brain v. my an-cap brain) How would these warlords pay their men? A species can only prey on itself when there is a State. Hobes got this exactly backwards. Tigers don't eat tigers. A tiger that does so will eventually be killed by the other tigers and will not be passing on his DNA. We know it would be a boy tiger not a girl tiger because women are so compassionate. And they are only good at killing their own children. Evolution and natural selection eliminate members of a species who don't adhere to the nature of the species. Warlords and their gangs will be killed or die off. The State protects criminals because crime is profit fort the State. Stefan's video about the police. What's in part 2? Without crime who doesn't make money? prison industrial-complex psychiatry industrial-complex therapy industrial-complex DUI industrial-complex justice industrial-complex police industrial-complex military/police supplies industrial-complex military industrial-complex TSA industrial-complex security & monitoring industrial-complex DHS industrial-complex anger management industrial-complex The State creates crime by protecting criminals p ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gt8E-LEPbc

Stating The Obvious #115 -- Pseudo-Libertarians, Voting is violence and Paulbots part 2 of 3 Julie Borowski -- RNC Corruption: Should Libertarians Leave Republican Party? http://youtu.be/W2qhx_LXAOw Token Libertarian Girl YouTube Channel http://www.youtube.com/user/TokenLibertarianGirl Messiahs come in many different flavours. For many of you, your Messiah is Hussein Obama. For some of you, your Messiah is Ron Paul. Today it's your turn for a bitch slapping from The Great One, Himself. Drones don't kill people. Statist kill people. You can not opt out of paying taxes if you want to avoid being killed by the state. You can opt out of voting without being killed. For now. That will change when the state makes voting mandatory. The Republican party shit all over the Paulbots and Pseudo-Libertarians and these idiots continue to cling to the Republican party. "We can't leave the Republican party" they cry. It's like the battered wife who says "He beats me because I don't love him enough. If I stay I can change him." The main parties get their power and legitimacy from people being members and voting for them. If no one votes Republicrat then the Republicrats can't win elections. 46% of people polled think that a third party is needed. This is exactly the time to be leaving the Republican party. If enough people leave the Republican party, take their money and their votes, the Republicans will lose more elections. I'm pretty fucking sure that will "have an effect" on the Republican party. The Republicrats are terrified of 3rd parties. That's why 3rd parties are ignored, excluded from debates and banned from getting into elections. That's why movements like the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street are instants taken over by the major parties. "If you don't support Ron Paul you are not a true libertarian." "If Ron Paul gets elected he is going to cut government." "Ron Paul is our only hope." All this bullshit is Messiah. Just like the dumb bitch who thought that Obama was going to pay her mortgage and put gas in her car. Ron Paul is not The Messiah any more than Hussien Obama is The Messiah. Ron Paul is just a guy. There is no Messiah you can elect president who is going to give you freedom. Only the slaves and the prisoners of the state can destroy the state. To do that we have to stop obeying, stop believing, stop funding, stop supporting the state -- and the first step is to stop voting. What is a Psudo-Libertarian? The traits of Psudo-Libertarians are: They cling to voting as a way to change the state. They believe you can change the state by working in the state. They believe that if we just had a "Constitutional" government everything would be great. They believe in incremental change to the state. T ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhw9yhmeduE