The Doctrina Iacobi is a Greek Christian polemical tract, from Carthage (Tunis), but written in Palestine by a Christian apologist. This anti-Jewish tract refers to a discussion of a group of Jews forced to convert by the Emperor Heraclius, yet one of the converted Jews, Jacob, who truly believes in Christ seeks to convince the other Jews of their need for Christianity. A childhood friend, Justus, comes from Palestine to debate with Jacob about his conversion. It is quite clear this is a fictitious account designed for apologetic purposes. From the debate between Jacob and Justus they all finally believe in Christ. Within this debate is a passage which we’re interested in written by the brother of Justus, named Abraham, who relates some quite startling information concerning the appearance of a new Prophet among the Saracens. This is that passage: Doctina Iacobi passage on ‘The Prophet’ “When the candidatus [i.e. Sergius, a member of the Byzantine imperial army in Palestine] was killed by the Saracens, I was at Caesarea and I set off by boat to Sykamina. People were saying "the candidatus has been killed," and we Jews were overjoyed. And they were saying that the prophet had appeared, coming with the Saracens, and that he was proclaiming the advent of the anointed one, the Christ who was to come. I, having arrived at Sykamina, stopped by a certain old man well-versed in scriptures, and I said to him: "What can you tell me about the prophet who has appeared with the Saracens?" He replied, groaning deeply: "He is false, for the prophets do not come armed with a sword. Truly they are works of anarchy being committed today and I fear that the first Christ to come, whom the Christians worship, was the one sent by God and we instead are preparing to receive the Antichrist. Indeed, Isaiah said that the Jews would retain a perverted and hardened heart until all the earth should be devastated. But you go, master Abraham, and find out about the prophet who has appeared." So I, Abraham, inquired and heard from those who had met him that there was no truth to be found in the so-called prophet, only the shedding of men's blood. He says also that he has the keys of paradise, which is incredible [i.e. not credible]”. There are a number of Problems with this passage: Crone & Cook: A number of areas which confront the Traditional Muhammad: 1) How can you have a Muslim prophet proclaiming ‘the Christ who was to come’, unless he was a Jewish Messiah, In the Qur’an in Surah 33:40 it says that Muhammad is the last prophets. 2) This passage assumes ‘Muhammad’ is still alive in 634, but the traditions say he died in 632 AD. 3) This prophet ‘has the keys of paradise’ which confronts the traditions. Nevo & Koren: A number of areas w ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hamaVI-6_CQ

After proving with the coins that the Standard Islamic Narrative is completely wrong concerning how Islam began, we now go to the Rock Inscriptions to find a similar problem. Rock Inscriptions, because they are made out of rocks which don't disintegrate or deteriorate over the centuries, are excellent pieces of evidence from the 7th century to give us a window into what was happening in that part of the world and at that time. So far researchers have located over 100,000 Rock inscriptions with 30,000 of them catalogued and surveyed across Arabia, the Negev, the Trans-Jordan, and Syria. Another 70,000 more have yet to be catalogued. One would expect Muhammad’s name, or references to Islam, or to Muslims, or even references to the Qur'an and Mecca on these inscriptions, all of which are located along the Haj routes, yet we don’t find one inscription with any of these references on them until after 690 AD, a full 60 years after Muhammad supposedly died. the Arabic used in these inscriptions are all chiselled in the Nabataean-Aramaic script which was the same Arabic which is later used in the earliest Qur'anic manuscripts. If they had been created in the Hijaz part of Arabia (i.e. the central Western area), as Muslims tell us, they would have used the southern Sabain script which was used in what is today Yemen and Oman, a script which had been created in 600 BC, and continued for 1200 years in southern and central Arabia. Ironically, the Sabaic script contained all the needed vowels and consonants required for a religious text, unlike the 7th century Arabic text which was used for the earliest Qur'anic manuscripts, which only employed between 14 - 16 consonantal letters, but without any of the 5 diacritical dots, nor the 3 vowels, all of which had to be created in the 8th and 9th centuries in order for people to understand what they were reading in the Qur'an. Furthermore, in the 7th century there were no rock inscriptions in the central part of Western Arabia, because there were too few people living there, due to the desert environment of that area. Without water, you cannot have many people, and without large numbers of people, just like the coins, you aren't going to have many rock inscriptions. Dr Ilka Lindstedt, in his research of rock inscriptions between the years 640 AD - 740 AD (which is roughly the Umayyad Period) found that almost all of the 7th century rock inscriptions were located in the north (i.e. around what is today Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, and Syria), and in the far south (i.e. around what is today Yemen). His findings concerning what these inscriptions said were also quite striking: Pre-690: Prior to 690 there was no evidence of anything Islamic on the Inscriptions (i.e. there was nothing written about Muhammad, nor about the Qur'an, nor about anyone called Muslims, nor about any religion called Islam, nor even anything about a city called Mecca), which because these all should have been in existence for over 60 years should have reference to reference about them. Except for certain pre-Islamic formulae, there is just nothing Islamic at all. 690 AD - 710 AD: References to a prophet called Muhammad begin to appear. But this is still not a prophet who lived in Mecca or Medina, but much further north. 710 AD - 720 AD: References to Muslim rites begin to appear, which include the pilgrimage, prayers, and even fasting. 720 AD - 730 AD: It is only at this late date that we begin to find the name 'Muslim' and 'Islam' used as a specific group in contradistinction to Christianity. Consequently, it was only in the 730s and on-wards that there is evidence of a popular devotion to Muhammad as a  prophet and messenger, which makes the Islamic Traditions incredibly awkward, since they clearly state that this all occurred during the time of Muhammad himself, which according to their dates would have happened over a century earlier. Much like almost every piece of evidence we are finding in the 7th century, these rock inscriptions categorically debunk the Standard Islamic Narrative historically. Watch as Al Fadi and Dr. Jay use these inscriptions to hammer yet another nail into the historicity of origins of Islam. © Pfander Centre for Apologetics - US, May 15, 2023 (73,400) Music: "Reaching the Sky" by Alexander Nakarada, from filmmusic-io ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mmd5CyQZLSM