"Ratfucking is an American slang term for political sabotage or dirty tricks." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratfucking #ElizabethWarren #WhichWarren #Centrist #Thirdwaydemocrat #Thirdway ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdYwVnOmX8w

Mom's love "lockdown". Bootlicker Mom's, that is. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzHu_JxCuSk

Senator #CharlesSchumer (NY) must go. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d32jEQVHaIA

1992 BBC documentary by Alan Francovich. ------------------------------ "Disinformation Directed Against U.S.", File Number ZF010858W - written by the US Army 3/10/1970 "There may be times when HC (Host Country) governments show passivity or indecision in face of Communist or Communist-inspired subversion, and react with inadequate vigor to intelligence estimates transmitted by U.S. agencies. Such situations are particularly likely to arise when the insurgency seeks to achieve tactical advantage by temporarily refraining from violence, thus lulling HC authorities into a state of false security. In such cases, U.S. Army intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince HC governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger and of the necessity of counteraction. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nu6VqFeWr9A&#t=4m07s To this end, U.S. Army intelligence should seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents on special assignment, with the task of forming special action groups among the more radical elements of the insurgency. When the kind of situation envisaged above arises, these groups, acting under U.S. Army intelligence control, should be used to launch violent or non-violent actions according to the nature of the case. Such actions could include those described in FM 30-31 as characterizing Phases II and III of insurgency. In cases where the infiltration of such agents into insurgent leadership has not been effectively implemented, it may help towards the achievement of the above ends to utilize ultra-leftist organizations." http://cryptome.org/inscom-foia02.htm "The absence of a direct and daunting external security threat is, of course a most obvious aspect of the difficulty in defining the future defense posture of the nation. The United States has long resisted maintaining a large standing military and the Cold War years could prove an aberration to that history. Extending this historical observation of small standing forces, it is clear that there is no adversary on the horizon even remotely approaching the military power of the former USSR. While we might conjure up nominal regional contingencies against Korea or Iraq as sensible planning scenarios for establishing the building blocks for force structure, it will prove difficult to sustain the current defense program over the long term without a real threat materializing to rally and coalesce public support." - 1996 Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance, National Defense University; Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade www.dodccrp.org/files/Ullman_Shock.pdf ------------------------------ Sword Play: Attacking Civilians to Justify "Greater Security" by Chris Floyd 2/18/05 'You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIJPk7Z7JJ4