As Hillary Clinton’s poll numbers continue their steady decline, some of her biggest supporters in years past for the Clinton Foundation are running for the exits. Five of the giant corporate sponsors of last year’s annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative have backed out of this year’s meeting. The meeting will take place next weekend without the support of Samsung, ExxonMobile, accounting firm Price-Waterhouse-Coopers, and big banks Deutsche Bank, and the 4th largest bank, the British banking conglomerate HSBC. Hewlett-Packard, which just announced another major round of layoffs, will end its cash donations and provide an in-kind contribution only to the meeting. Monsanto has cut back its donation. Dow Chemical’s name is also missing from this year’s donor list. Politicians worldwide are jumping ship as well. Last year’s event brought 8 national leaders, kings, presidents and prime ministers. This year, only leaders from Columbia and Liberia will be attending. Even prominent Obama administration officials have abandoned this year’s event. Big corporate names still supporting the Clinton’s event are Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, clothes retailer – Gap; Barclays Bank, Coke, Proctor & Gamble, and Cisco. As one commentator put it: “The karma bus has stopped at the Clinton’s doorstep!” I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.

Read This Report: http://www.billstill.com/uncategorized/sr-1352-hillary-clinton-cannot-steal-election-trump/ Visit our website now: http://www.billstill.com - considered by informed insiders’ as THE ultimate resource for fixing the National Debt problem. Good evening, I’m still reporting on Hillary Clinton Cannot Steal the Election From Trump! Fear and trembling still runs rampant throughout Trump supporters - fanned by the MSM - that Hillary Clinton still has any chance of stealing this election back from Donald Trump. The reason for the fear is the tsunami of coercive hate mail that Electoral College members are reporting from in states Trump has won, designed to get enough electors to switch their vote from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton in order to change the obvious results. The Electoral College voting takes place on Dec. 19 – when electors assemble in their respective state capitals. Michael Banerian, 22, of Oakland County, Michigan, is one of Michigan’s 16 official electors who will meet in the state capital of Lansing on that day. He is the Youth Chairman for the Michigan Republican party. He recently told the Detroit News that he has received threatening emails - lots of them - from people trying to coerce him to switch his vote from Trump to Clinton. [insert] He explained that in the Michigan system, even if he did switch his vote for Clinton, it wouldn’t matter: [insert] Of the 57 previous presidential elections in US history, only 22 meetings of the Electoral college have seen a single faithless elector. Only 179 electors have been faithless in voting for the candidate they were pledged to vote for totally in all of our 57 presidential elections. However, of those, 71 changed their votes because the candidate to whom they were pledged died between the election and the meeting of the Electoral College. Another 23 in the 1836 election abstained from voting for Vice-President as a block. That leaves only 84 times where an elector changed their mind. So, a truly faithless elector is very rare. However, the death threats are today rampant across the states Donald Trump won. I won’t go through the lengthy list of threats the electors have faced since the election, just suffice it to say that it has been unprecedented in both the number, and fury, as the forces of leftist globalist idealism, anarchic communism, and radical Islamic terror have all been slapped with a surprise defeat in a single stroke by an indomitable, long-shot candidate, Donald J. Trump. Faithless electors have never changed the outcome of any presidential race to date. Fortunately, Trump’s Monster vote overruled such a Constitutional crisis. But even in this unlikely scenario of a massive rush of faithless electors at this point, there is still one final check the Founders in their wisdom built into the system. After the Dec. 19 vote of the Electoral College meeting in the individual states, the ballots are counted and the results are transmitted to a joint session of Congress which is held on Jan. 6th. So, Congress knows the results of the Electoral College vote from Dec. 19 on. When Congress meets in joint session, it is usually a mere formality of accepting the votes of the states. So, in alphabetical order, the state results are presented. If there is an objection to the results – for example if election fraud was alleged, or coercion of an elector was alleged – this is the time when that is decided: Members of Congress can object to any state’s vote count, provided the objection is presented in writing and is signed by at least one member of each house of Congress. Then Congress would immediately adjourn its joint session and return to their individual chambers to debate and vote on each objection. After that vote, the joint session would be resumed. If the objection is rejected, then that state’s vote count stands as presented to Congress. By this means, the entire deliberative weight of both houses of Congress can be thrown at any issue that may violate the sanctity of the vote for President and Vice President of the United States of America. Yes, Congress would actually decide. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate. Connect with Bill Still: https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3 https://plus.google.com/u/0/+BillStill http://billstills.blogspot.in/ https://twitter.com/billstill https://www.facebook.com/BillStillOfficial https://www.pinterest.com/billstills/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/billstill http://billstills.tumblr.com/ https://billstills.wordpress.com/ https://www.diigo.com/profile/billstill https://www.reddit.com/user/billstills/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/billstillss Consider becoming a cherished sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3204630 https://youtu.be/fMiebsgeIk8

Visit our website now: http://www.billstill.com Good morning, I’m still reporting on technology. I first started writing this story two days ago, but wanted to dig deeply into the technology before I went with it. This started out on Friday when a blog called “The Ferocious Conservative Activist Bulletin, apparently written by a John Gaultier, printed a warning to Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton may wear a secret transceiver device hidden in her ear during the debates to prompt her with advice. An in-the-ear transceiver is a device that allows the wearer to receive prompts from off stage, and even to talk back to the prompter in the lowest whisper. The Gaultier article also claimed that President Obama wore one during the 2012 debates. Gaultier shows a number of pictures of Hillary Clinton inserting wired earbuds into her ears . These photos are irrelevant to this discussion. He also shows pictures of President Obama – some of which could easily be photoshopped fakes - but two of them clearly show the President with his left hand up to his left ear as though he is adjusting the volume of an earpiece. There are many other pictures associated with this piece, but these are the only two that I find credible in any way that may suggest that Obama is wearing a transceiver earpiece. So what is this transceiver thing? Well, transceiver earpieces have been around for some time, but they are getting very, very sophisticated now. They have been used on Broadway and on movie sets for prompting actors when they forget their lines. They have been used as spy tools and for police undercover work. But the latest is they are being advertised as high dollar cheating devices to be used by students who want to score a perfect grade on SAT tests, for example. This piece ran in the Daily Mail. “The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority is investigating concerns that students could be using the devices linked to mobile phones or MP3 players. “A Canadian company is openly promoting the invisible, wireless ‘micro spy earphone’ to exam candidates around the world…. “The Toronto-based company, Examear, uses the advertising slogan: ‘Helping students succeed. Worldwide!’ " Examear also states: "The wireless earphone is extremely small, and is not visible in the ear, this makes it a perfect helper to complete the desired test/presentation/etc.” Their “silver” model: “…was especially designed for high school, and greatly fits the needs of students who are doing a test, exam or any class assignment." So the silver model is only an RF receiver. But their gold model is a full blown transceiver: “The Gold model boasts a highly sensitive microphone which would pick up a student's voice even if they whisper." Of course, the folks who administer college testing in the UK are outraged that this technology is being openly advertised in Britain. According to Isabel Nisbet, Director of Regulation and Standards at the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority – or QCA: “As a regulator we take malpractice very seriously and will be taking any action we can.” A report commissioned by the QCA suggested using technology to stop mobile phone signals working in exam halls. But that would mean turning testing rooms into military-grade SCIF’s – where TOP SECRET information can be discussed – which block all incoming or outgoing RF – or radio frequency – transmissions. In other words, it’s expensive and not easy to do. However in the U.S. during a presidential debate, such blocking tactics are impossible, and the stakes could not be higher. A presidential campaign can turn on a candidate’s performance at a single debate. It would be malfeasance for a candidate not to try to take advantage of such technology. The setup would be something like this. A base station relay would be deployed within a few hundred feet of the candidate’s ear transceiver. The base station would connect the wearer thru the cellular system to a discrete and secure number for the White House, for example. The base station could even be disguised inside a cell phone of someone sitting in the front row of the audience. In the situation room of the White House, a team of top advisors would assemble to make quick suggestions for responses to every question. Of course, the candidate would need some training to be able to utilize this advice in his ear, but that training technology is well established where the stakes are high. It’s called “blue phoning”. It’s used by high-value sales managers to train new salespeople, who know little about sales methods or how to answer complex questions. John Gaultier quotes sales manager Mark McGrew who has used the technique extensively: “A manager listens in to a call between a salesman and his customer. The customer can not hear the manager. “The call is recorded so that the salesman can listen to it later, over and over again, until he understands what to do when he is on his own. https://youtu.be/NFJCqGQavPE

International aviation investigators say that the cockpit of the MH17 airliner shot down over eastern Ukraine has been mysteriously sawed in half.