Published By
Created On
16 Oct 2021 16:15:12 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
Listening To Manchin And Sinema Would Cost America 2 Million Jobs Per Year
The Economic Policy Institute recently released numbers showing that the cuts put forward by Joe Manchin to the Build Back Better Act (which are also supported by Kyrsten Sinema) would end up creating 2 million fewer jobs per year than the original proposal. To put it another way, if Democrats take the advice of these corporatists, they will be costing us 2 million jobs per year, all to benefit corporations. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins discusses this.
Link - https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/10/08/manchin-plan-gut-biden-agenda-would-support-2-million-fewer-jobs-year
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Find our merchandise at Teespring: https://teespring.com/stores/rof-store
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/RingofFireRadio
Google+: http://plus.google.com/118415831573195648557
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
Follow more of our stories at http://www.TROFIRE.com
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
If the Democrats decide to listen to corporate office like Joe Manchin and Kirsten Sinema, it would end up costing the U S economy 2 million jobs per year over the next 10 years. That is the analysis by the economic policy Institute released late last week, where they looked at mansion's proposal, which is what $1.5 trillion instead of three and a half trillion dollars. And they were able to determine that the original three and a half trillion dollar plan would in fact, create 4 million jobs per year, over 10 years of grand, total of 40 million jobs. If we invested all of this money back into the United States, which is what it is, but mansion only wants to do one and a half trillion. That's his compromise, that's his limit as if he has to pay for it himself, which drives me insane. So the epi economic policy Institute looks at and says, okay, so what would happen if we did the one and a half trillion dollar one?
Oh, you only get 2 million jobs per year. For 10 years, you still get 2 million new jobs per year, which, Hey, sure. Not bad, but 2 million as I'm sure you quick math experts out there have already figured out is only half a 4 million. And by the way, Kirsten
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PdTq305sYw
Link - https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/10/08/manchin-plan-gut-biden-agenda-would-support-2-million-fewer-jobs-year
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Find our merchandise at Teespring: https://teespring.com/stores/rof-store
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/RingofFireRadio
Google+: http://plus.google.com/118415831573195648557
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
Follow more of our stories at http://www.TROFIRE.com
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
If the Democrats decide to listen to corporate office like Joe Manchin and Kirsten Sinema, it would end up costing the U S economy 2 million jobs per year over the next 10 years. That is the analysis by the economic policy Institute released late last week, where they looked at mansion's proposal, which is what $1.5 trillion instead of three and a half trillion dollars. And they were able to determine that the original three and a half trillion dollar plan would in fact, create 4 million jobs per year, over 10 years of grand, total of 40 million jobs. If we invested all of this money back into the United States, which is what it is, but mansion only wants to do one and a half trillion. That's his compromise, that's his limit as if he has to pay for it himself, which drives me insane. So the epi economic policy Institute looks at and says, okay, so what would happen if we did the one and a half trillion dollar one?
Oh, you only get 2 million jobs per year. For 10 years, you still get 2 million new jobs per year, which, Hey, sure. Not bad, but 2 million as I'm sure you quick math experts out there have already figured out is only half a 4 million. And by the way, Kirsten
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PdTq305sYw
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
English
More from the publisher
Controlling
VIDEO
TRUMP
trump-melts-down-over-special
Special Prosecutor Jack Smith suggested a trial start date of January 2nd next year to begin Trump's trial over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, and the former President went absolutely ballistic over this proposal. Trump took to Truth Social to say that only an "out of touch lunatic" would propose such a date, but then couldn't explain why that date was such a bad idea. After all, if Trump did nothing wrong wouldn't he want to be exonerated before the primaries get too far underway? Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins discusses this.
Link - https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/10/special-counsel-wants-jan-2-trial-in-trump-election-case.html
Check out our merch by visiting our store: https://www.buyrof.com/
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RingofFireMedia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
So late last week, special counsel Jack Smith decided to put in a court filing requesting a trial date for Donald Trump of January 2nd, 2024, right, the day after New Year's Day. Let's get to it. Let's make this happen. Let's start the trial right now. Judge Truken. And once this was made public and Donald Trump realized that, hey, maybe I should have gone to that hearing and paid attention more to my case, Donald Trump was furious and seemingly a little bit panicked. So Donald Trump got on true social after learning about the proposed date of January 2nd. And he had this very bizarre statement to make deranged, Jack Smith has just asked for a trial on the Biden indictment to take place on January 2nd, just ahead of the important Iowa caucuses to Biden indictment. What the, anyway, only an out of touch lunatic would ask for such a date one day into the New year and maximum election interference with Iowa. Such a trial, which should never take place due to my first amendment rights and massive Biden corruption should only happen if at all after the election. The same with other fake Biden indictments, election interference.
You know, for somebody who maintains his innocence, uh, as much as you do, shouldn't, you want the trial to like get over with as soon as possible? Uh, you ought be going back and arguing like, no, no, no, no. January 2nd. Hell no. Let's get his September 2nd. Let's, let's get this over with. I got debates to not go to, but if you were truly innocent and you knew that you could prove that you would want the trial to be over with before the voting starts in the primaries and caucuses, right? Because if Jack Smith has his way and you basically get convicted right around the time of the Iowa Caucus, which will be January 15th, first in the nation for the Republicans, um, then it's gonna hurt you all down the line. But if you get acquitted, you got the nomination in the bag January 15th. By the way, it should also be noted, um, not only is it the Iowa caucus date, that is actually the start date of the next trial that Donald Trump is facing from Eugene Carroll.
So he's gonna have a busy gen, he's gonna have a very busy 2024, not just with caucuses and primaries, but also of course with all of the trials that he's going to be facing. His Manhattan trial, by the way, is still scheduled to begin in December. So he would go right from Manhattan prosecution to federal prosecution to Eugene Carroll civil suit, and then later down the road, probably the Georgia trial. And then of course, judge, uh, uh, Cannon's trial that she set for the end of May, because, you know, let's let all the voting end and then when it's too late for Republicans to do anything, then we'll convict him. So she kinda screwed the pooch there,
There all the other prosecutors are like, let's just do it. Let's make it happen. And Trump is so, like his statement too, like, only an out of touch lunatic would ask for such a date one day into the new year. Like, I'm sorry, but by January 2nd, holiday's over, bro, everybody's back to work, including federal courthouses, including federal prosecutors. You know, if you wanted to retire and not have to work the day after New Year's Day, then you should have just retired and not run for president again. I mean, you'd still be facing prosecution, let's be honest.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYzWUqrM84M
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
LIN W
lin-wood-throws-sidney-powell-under-the
Go to https://curiositystream.thld.co/ROF and use code ROF to save 25% off today, that’s only $14.99 a year.
Pro-Trump lawyers Sidney Powell and Lin Wood had a virtual hearing in front of a Michigan judge on Monday, where things quickly devolved into absolute chaos. But at one point, Wood attempted to throw Powell under the bus by claiming that his name was put on a legal proceeding without his permission. Powell says that Wood is lying, so the truth could be anything at this point. But however the chips fall, it likely won't be good for either Wood or Powell, as Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains.
Link - https://www.rawstory.com/lin-wood-throws-sidney-powell-under-bus/
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Find our merchandise at Teespring: https://teespring.com/stores/rof-store
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/RingofFireRadio
Google+: http://plus.google.com/118415831573195648557
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
Follow more of our stories at http://www.TROFIRE.com
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Yesterday, there was a virtual court hearing with Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, both pro Trump attorneys who had filed challenges to the 2020 election. But they were facing a hearing in Michigan, uh, to determine whether or not they needed to be sanctioned for their actions. And as you would probably expect the hearing quickly Devolved into total chaos,
Sidney Powell actually ended, uh, the hearing by throwing and massive tantrum going on this long, long rant that I'm sure did nothing to help her case. And even after the hearing aired, which by the way, they were prohibited from recording it, uh, Lynn would actually send out to his supporters, a snippet Of the hearing that he recorded. So
If you're trying to avoid sanctions, I don't think breaking the rules that the court had put in place are a good start here. But there was one point point in the hearing that really stood out to me. And that was when Lynwood attempted to actually throw Sidney Powell under the bus. And before I get to that, here's a little backstory on what's actually happening here. Uh, basically they
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb-N9PK_jLw
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
TRUMP
trump-swears-it-was-his-idea-for-ivanka
On Monday, Donald Trump hit back against reports from over a month ago that Ivanka and Jared Kushner wanted nothing to do with his new presidential campaign. Trump insisted that it was actually HIS idea for the couple to stay out of the new race, in spite of multiple reports to the contrary - again, from over a month ago. It isn't clear why Trump is suddenly mad about this, but anger is apparently all he knows these days. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins discusses this.
Link - https://www.rawstory.com/trump-ivanka-kushner-2659012904/
Check out our merch by visiting our store: https://www.buyrof.com/
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RingofFireMedia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Recently Donald Trump gave an interview to New York Magazine, uh, reporter, Olivia Newsy, where he discussed several things. But one of the things that really seemed to get under his skin was when Nui asked him about Jared and Ivanka not being involved with his third presidential campaign. And then the piece came out and Donald Trump still angry about this story that really is over a month old, got on truth social and said this, contrary to fake news reporting, I never asked Jared or Ivanka to be part of the 2024 campaign for president, and in fact, specifically asked them not to do it too mean and nasty with the fake and corrupt news and having to deal with some absolutely horrendous SLS bags in the world of politics and beyond. There has never been anything like this ride before and they should not be further subjected to it. I ran twice getting millions more votes, uh, the second time rigged and am doing it again. Okay, see, it's like, no, no, no, no, no. They didn't dump me. What happened was I kind of like fired them myself. You know, I, they, they, they wanted to probably, but I said, Nope, nope. Now, Jared and Ivanka, I'm trying to protect you. I know you wanna be a part of this. I know you do, but I just can't let you do it cuz I'm such a good dad. I'm a good father-in-law. Y'all go live your lives. I just want you to be happy.
Does anybody honestly, truly believe that that is what happened? Do we truly believe that Donald Trump put the best interest of his favorite, favorite child ahead of his own selfish interest? Because I don't, not for a second. I think he's trying to save face and I also think that he's putting it back into people's heads, a story that's over a month old and nobody's thought about or cared about in over a month. That's what's so funny about this to me, is like, it doesn't matter. You are getting worked up and also again, reminding people that this even happened over a story that's a month and a half old that nobody even really cared about at the time. So why are you even bringing it up? Sometimes it's best to just let the sleeping dogs lie. No, nobody cares. We don't care if you told them not to do it. We don't care if they gave you the middle finger and said, we're not doing it. Nobody cares. Ivanka and Jared are, are literally the poster children for incompetence sense. It's probably best for your campaign that they're not working on it because they're so dumb. They are just genuinely stupid people.
But he won't let it go. Nope, nope, nope. He can't be seen as the guy that God dumped.
You're not breaking up with me because I'm breaking up with you, is essentially what he's telling us here. And much like last time, nobody, nobody in the world of politics actually gives a. But the fact that it bothers Donald Trump so much is the only fun part of this.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1YayKp4L64
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
JUDGE
judge-chutkan-sets-trap-by-temporarily
Judge Tanya Chutkan on Friday temporarily lifted the gag order against Donald Trump as he attempts to appeal the ruling. The appeal had already been held up due to the fact that his lawyer wasn't admitted to the district bar and they refused to accept his filing, but even without that idiotic oversight, Chutkan's ruling appears to be a bit of a head scratcher. But maybe not - the judge might be setting a trap for Trump, as Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains.
Link - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-gag-order-temporarily-lifted_n_65330300e4b0689b3fbc85e1
Check out our merch by visiting our store: https://www.buyrof.com/
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RingofFireMedia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
In a stunningly bizarre move. On Friday, judge Tanya Chut decided to temporarily lift her gag order against Donald Trump from saying disparaging comments about the, the prosecutors or the court staff and personnel or the witnesses in the case. She said, all right, you're appealing this. I'm gonna lift it. I'm gonna put a stay on it, basically. Uh, so it still exists. It's just not enforced. Even if he violates it while he appeals, the actual gag order itself, which of course Donald Trump says is somehow unconstitutional, even though it's a ruling from a court. Now, this had me scratching my head a little bit at first, right? Like, why would Chuck can do this? She could easily leave the gag order in place as Trump appeals it, right? There's no danger with that. Maybe it's a show of good faith. I started thinking like, maybe she's just trying to show the appellate court like, Hey, listen, I'm, I'm not unreasonable, and since there's no final ruling, I'm not gonna make it be in place right now. She didn't have to do that, but I thought maybe that's why. But then I, I sat over the weekend thinking about this and then I realized what I think is actually happening. I think this is a trap. I think Judge Truken isn't doing this necessarily as a show of good faith. I think she's doing it a a as in, okay,
Alright,
You want the gag order gone? I'll take the gag order off while you appeal it. You are free to say whatever you want. Go ahead, say whatever you want. Say something. Do it. I dare you. That's what I think is happening here, because think of it this way, let's suppose the gag order goes to the appellate court. The appellate court looks down and says, well, he, I mean, he hasn't said anything that bad. You know, why? Why would we take the gag? Why would we leave the gag order in place? He seems to be behaving himself, right? He's minding his Ps and Qs, but by lifting the gag order and taking away any potential punishments for the time being, judge Truken is opening the door for Donald Trump to run his stupid mouth, say something horrific, and then when the appellate court actually gets to the issue of whether or not the gag order should be in place, she can be like, oh, by the way, I don't know if you notice this, but just in the last week, here's everything he said.
That is of course, assuming he says something stupid, but this is Donald Trump we're talking about. So he's gonna say something stupid. I mean, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when can he keep his mouth shut until the appellate court rules on this gag order? I don't think so. I think he will screw up, and I think that is what Judge Chuck is waiting for. I think that's why she did it, because she knew if she takes it away, he's gonna say something horrific that will spark the appellate court to say, oh no, this gag order is necessary. So she's likely playing three dimensional chess. While, you know, I was looking at it as merely a game of Connect four, she was 10 steps ahead of me because again, at first I thought, this is not a good idea. But then once you start thinking about it, you realize, you know what? She knows what she's doing. She's a hell of a lot smarter than I am. I trust her judgment and I think she is laying the perfect trap for Donald Trump.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr0BNprRk8A
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
EVEN
even-trump's-allies-think-his-brain-is
Donald Trump's mental screwups are becoming so common and noticeable that even some of his former allies can't ignore them. During a recent segment, former Fox News host Megyn Kelly admitted that Trump isn't as "sharp" as he used to be, pointing out his constant blunders and inability to keep a train of thought on track. The Biden administration is also trying to capitalize on Trump's mental hiccups, painting him as the one who is out of touch and not stable enough to serve in office. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains what's happening.
Link - https://www.businessinsider.com/megyn-kelly-donald-trump-not-as-mentally-sharp-once-was-2023-12
Check out our merch by visiting our store: https://www.buyrof.com/
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RingofFireMedia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Donald Trump's mental slipups are getting so bad that even some of his former allies, well, I guess on again, off again Ally, we could call her, are starting to say that. Yeah, something definitely appears to be off with this guy, specifically Megan Kelly, the former Fox News anchor, who in a recent interview with Alex Jones, for some reason, admitted that Donald Trump appears to be slipping a bit here, is what me, Kelly had to say. There's no question that Trump has lost a step or multiple steps. He is confusing Joe Biden for Obama. I know he is now saying he intentionally did that. Go back and look at the clips. It wasn't intentional. With all due respect to Trump, this is what happens when you're 77 years old. She said, Trump seems inhuman, but he's not inhuman. He's a human. He's a man. She also noted that he's making mistakes repeatedly, including confusing countries, confusing cities where he is.
So at any given point, Donald Trump doesn't know who the president is, doesn't know who he's running against, doesn't know who he ran against in 2016, doesn't know where he is, doesn't know where countries are, just can't seem to get right. And of course, Donald Trump actually came out recently, uh, after the Lincoln Project, ran an ad showing all these clips of Trump making these very obvious mistakes. Um, Donald Trump came out and said, no, that's ai. They had AI make the video to make me look like I'm saying things that are wrong that I never said. So before that, though, now that he's now saying, I never said those things, that's all like created digitally before that he did, as me Kelly said, claimed that it was intentional. So he went from saying, oh, I intentionally screw things up, you know, just to just keep everybody on their toes.
I like to say things that are totally off base just to make sure people are paying attention. Uh, now he's like, actually, I never did that either. Uh, this is all just AI generated, you know, CGI stuff, I, I I don't make mistakes. What are you talking about? I never tried to write off my mistakes. It's all digital. This is a man that's losing it. He is losing his grip on reality. And I don't know if it's because of his age. I mean, let's be real, at 77 years old with his body type, he, he's actually, I, he's not in shape, but he does appear to be healthy, okay? But physical health, you know, his heart, he is 77, overweight, hasn't had a heart attack. You know, that's kind of, kind of remarkable, right? But none of that is necessarily an indication that the mind is intact. I mean, Biden looks like he's in great shape, but he
Has slowed down. That's, that's a given. So it's difficult, right? Like we can see if somebody's struggling with their breathing, we can tell when they have trouble going up the stairs if they're old or outta shape or whatever. But with the brain, all we can rely on is the evidence they give us coming through their words, and in some cases, control of their own body. And me, Kelly again, she's been an on and off ally for Donald Trump is telling us that what we see with his brain is that it's just turned into jello. It's mush now. It's like a, a lumpy pot of mashed potatoes got poured into his head. And we need to listen to these people on this particular issue.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bzq2LtP33uQ
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
FOX N
fox-news-may-have-already-doomed-their
**Get $5 off Magic Spoon's Keto-friendly cereal! Follow the link and use code ROF at checkout! http://magicspoon.com/rof
According to a lawyer from Dominion Voting Systems, Fox News might have already ruined their chances of successfully defending the defamation suit that Dominion filed against them. The reason for this is because the network has already been airing disclaimers about the claims they've made, showing that they know these claims are false. However, they aren't running disclaimers on the popular shows that continue to push misinformation. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains what's happening.
Link - https://www.rawstory.com/fox-news-lawsuit/
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Find our merchandise at Teespring: https://teespring.com/stores/rof-store
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/RingofFireRadio
Google+: http://plus.google.com/118415831573195648557
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
Follow more of our stories at http://www.TROFIRE.com
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Over the weekend, a lawyer for dominion voting systems, the group that is suing Fox news for allegedly allowing unfettered lies about the company to air on their network. Uh, a lawyer for this group appeared on CNN, where he laid out the fact that it's likely that Fox news has already ruined their case. They have destroyed their own defense by their actions. And basically just to kind of paraphrase what this lawyer was saying is that because Fox news, even after dominion had warned them, that what they're saying is not true. Fox news continued to have on people like Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell who continued to spread lies about the company in their prime time programming yet in their daytime programming Fox news actually had on somebody from dominion to a dispute, all the claims against the company. And of course during this time they would also air disclaimers saying that all the claims made during prime time, weren't actually verified by anyone and were likely not true.
And the lawyer pointed out that while they were telling the truth in the daytime, when they had lower viewer
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb9De9A8aRk
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
TRUMP
trump-admits-to-being-a-criminal-during
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/RingofFireRadio
Google+: http://plus.google.com/118415831573195648557
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
Follow more of our stories at http://www.TROFIRE.com
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrKcIZts87M
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
REPUB
republican-senator-wants-to-ban-federal
Republican Senator Thom Tillis is putting forth legislation that would ban any federal funds from going to states that, as he put, "misuse the 14th Amendment." In other words, Tillis wants to ban federal money to any state that kicks Donald Trump off the ballot using the language of the U.S. Constitution. So, taken all together, it is clear that Senator Tillis does NOT support the Constitution, and that is the message that the Democrats need to roll with going forward. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins discusses this.
Link - https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4368856-sen-tillis-introduce-legislation-barring-federal-funds-from-states-misusing-14th-amendment/
Check out our merch by visiting our store: https://www.buyrof.com/
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RingofFireMedia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Republican Senator Tom Tillis is so upset that the Colorado Supreme Court has barred Donald Trump from being on the ballot in the state that he has now introduced legislation, which is actually an amendment to the, uh, uh, help America Vote Act of the year 2002. And what his new legislation amending the Help America Vote Act would do is it would strip states of federal funding if they, as he puts it, misuse the 14th Amendment. You know, we're just getting super specific for no reason. Right. I mean, anybody could misuse the 14th Amendment for any reason. It's totally not because of, you know, what's happening in Colorado. I'm definitely not trying to just protect Donald Trump. Oh God, no. No. This is, you know, a hypothetical. Um, no, you're, you're definitely trying to protect Donald Trump and you wanna strip states of their funding for misusing the 14th Amendment.
Here's what Tillis had to say about it. Regardless of whether you support or oppose former President Donald Trump, it is outrageous to see left wing activists make a mockery of our political system by scheming with partisan state officials and pressuring judges to remove him from the ballot. American voters, not partisan activists should decide who we elect as our president. The Constitutional Election Integrity Act would put any constitutional challenges in the sole place. They belong the US Supreme Court. Okay, well, let's go into the Supreme Court. So I don't know what your beef is. Not to mention you called these people left wing activists, left-wing activists got Trump barred from the ballot in Colorado. No, this lawsuit was brought by Republicans. These are Republican activists, bud. This, no, there's no liberals involved. Sure. One of the groups that helped this citizens for responsibility and ethics in Washington.
Yeah. They have a leftward bent, obviously, but it was Republicans that were plaintiffs. So off the bat, your whole basis for this legislation to strip states of their funding is based on improper facts. So maybe get your facts straight before you try to change the law here in the United States. I mean, you're a US Senator, that should be your job, but apparently you don't know enough about anything to faithfully execute the duties of your job. That's what I'm seeing here. Not to mention you're saying they pressured the courts. They pressured the court, they, they brought a lawsuit. That that's literally what courts are for, for, for lawsuits and criminal proceedings. Like that's what the court is there for. If people aren't bringing lawsuits, then we got no need for courts. So, you know, how dare you use this thing for what
It's meant to be used for that That makes no sense. That's something a crazy person says. Sure. But definitely not something we should hear from a United States Senator. Also, it sounds like your beef really is with the 14th amendment of the US Constitution. If you have a problem with that, call for a constitutional convention. See if you can get two thirds of the House and Senate to repeal it or write a new amendment or see if you can get, you know, the two thirds of the state legislatures to do it, but it's in the Constitution and if you don't like it, there are mechanisms to change the Constitution. You just don't have the numbers to do it.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CknnPARqBzM
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
SECRE
secret-service-magically-finds-missing
After telling the world this past week that text messages from service members in the days surrounding January 6th were missing for good, an investigation was announced by the Inspector General to find out what happened inside the Secret Service. And now, in a miraculous turn, the agency says that they have found the text messages on multiple different devices. This only makes the drama worse, as Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains.
Link - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/secret-service-text-messages-jan-6-b2129897.html
Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com
Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire
Find our merchandise at Teespring: https://teespring.com/stores/rof-store
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RingofFireMedia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Glory, hallelujah folks. We have witnessed a real life miracle in Washington, DC. Last week we were told by the United States secret service, that those text messages that the, uh, house select committee and that the other investigators wanted to get their hands on. Totally disappeared. The secret service looked everywhere. They couldn't find them. Those text messages. They told us were gone forever. And then miraculously, shortly after it was announced that a criminal investigation had been launched. The secret service says, oh shoot, wait a minute. Here they are on at least 10 different devices. We found all of those text messages you were looking for. Again, praise the Lord. It is a miracle that these text messages magically reappeared, as soon as a criminal investigation against the secret service was launched. I don't know if you believe in God or not, but really folks we've gotta admit, this is quite a miracle here.
Cuz those text messages again, just miraculously and magically reappeared on these devices that the secret service already told us they'd looked through. They weren't there. They all got deleted in the migration except they didn't. And the secret service very clearly lied to us about not being able to find the messages either. They lied to us about not being able to find the messages or they never actually looked in the first place, right? It's gotta be one of those two things. But again, the fact that they found them as soon as a criminal investigation was launched, that kind of tells us everything we need to know that this likely was malicious. Not only the oops, we can't find them, but clearly I think the deletion of these text messages in the first place now, as I pointed out last week in today's digital age, nothing is ever really deleted, especially not text messages, right? Those things are saved. If they're not saved on your personal device, they're either saved in the cloud. They've been connected to other devices where they're saved. In many instances, you can actually get them from the cell phone carriers themselves. These things are never truly gone.
And apparently, sometimes they're just still sitting on the device. You just don't want to admit to the investigators that you still had. 'em in your possession. Uh, the secret service has taken such a massive hit that I don't know that this agency is credible at all anymore. Right? Let's not forget right at the end of the day, these people are still cops. Okay? And we have seen the problems with cops here in the United States. They're no different. It doesn't matter if you wear a suit and tie and have an earpiece, or if you're walking the beat with a badge, trying to make sure that no black kids steal a bag of chips from a grocery store.
Apparently they're all the same from the top to the bottom and everywhere in between. And these secret service agents are no different. They were trying to protect their own. They didn't want to give up their own members and now they have become so embroiled in this scandal that it threatens to take away any legitimacy that this agency ever had. I'd say it's time for some firings. I'd say it's time to give up these people. I know the secret service is clearly gonna try to protect their own like they have been. But now that you've found the text messages and of course now that there is still an ongoing criminal investigation, cuz they're not gonna drop it just cuz you said you couldn't find them.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W38uNEq5wjs
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English