An Australian bill called News Media Bargaining Code led to the breaking point of relations between Facebook and Australia. The bill requires Google and Facebook to pay for the news that the Australian media share on these platforms. The bill also requires the two companies to provide Australian media with information on how their algorithms work and user data. Last week, on behalf of Google, Mel Silva published an open letter to Australians in which she points out that Google Search and YouTube are at risk in Australia. Facebook has made a decision on this controversial issue, which the Australian media call a bullying threat. “Assuming this draft code becomes law, we will reluctantly stop allowing publishers and people in Australia from sharing local and international news on Facebook and Instagram. This is not our first choice – it is our last. But it is the only way to protect against an outcome that defies logic and will hurt, not help, the long-term vibrancy of Australia’s news and media sector,” said Will Easton, managing director for Facebook in Australia and New Zealand. Easton called the proposed law ‘unprecedented in its reach’ and said the ACCC would force Facebook to pay for content that was voluntarily being shared across its platform. The announcement about news came as Facebook warned users it would be updating its terms of reference next month. The agreement says: “We also can remove or restrict access to your content, services or information if we determine that doing so is reasonably necessary to avoid or mitigate adverse legal or regulatory impacts to Facebook”. “We already invest millions of dollars in Australian news businesses and, during discussions over this legislation, we offered to invest millions more. We had also hoped to bring Facebook News to Australia, a feature on our platform exclusively for news, where we pay publishers for their content,” said Easton. “But these proposals were overlooked. Instead, we are left with a choice of either removing news entirely or accepting a system that lets publishers charge us for as much content as they want at a price with no clear limits. Unfortunately, no business can operate that way.” The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission posted a statement on Facebook, “Facebook’s threat today to prevent any sharing of news on its services in Australia is ill-timed and misconceived. The draft media bargaining code aims to ensure Australian news businesses, including independent, community and regional media, can get a seat at the table for fair negotiations with Facebook and Google. Facebook already pays some media for news content. The code simply aims to bring fairness and transparency to Facebook and Google’s relationships with Australian ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4FrO1wrWq0

Elon Musk moved from California to Texas. #shorts ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXrXfyb3-Go

Follow on Twitter: RepeatAfterVee 1. Elon Musk is under pressure to end world hunger. In this unsophisticated blackmail that reads, "either you will give us 6 billion dollars, or we will do everything to destroy you in the eyes of the public," Elon's opponents risked being sued before both domestic and international courts. But instead of a lawsuit, Elon decided to give them money if they show how 6 billion can end the world hunger. Since in 2020, the UN World Food Program had 8.4 billion at its disposal and the world hunger did not end, this fake media headline was compromised and thus the attack on Elon was stopped. However, Elon did not withdraw, but left his offer on the table if the World Food Program shows a detailed plan for spending money as well as their ledger of transactions to the public. 2. Elon is under pressure to pay taxes on unrealized gains. The government has a great idea how to tax money that citizens have not earned. For some of you who may not understand this. The tax on an unrealized gain looks like this. For example, you bought Tesla shares for $ 100. The price of Tesla has risen and you now have shares worth $ 1,000. So you have a gain of $ 900, but you didn’t sell the stock. That $ 900 will be taxed. Yes, the price can fall, so you can lose that profit, but that is your problem. Elon decided to please the people and the government and to sell his shares in Tesla in order to pay taxes. To be clear, he has no legal obligation to do so. In fact, he started a poll on Twitter in which he asked his followers if they agreed with him selling 10% of his shares in Tesla. Although the poll is still active, most voters want Elon to sell it. Elon knew the result in advance I mean, probably. I'm guessing based on the fact that his brother Kimbal Musk sold his shares in Tesla, worth over 100 million dollars, just one day before this poll. To be clear, this is not illegal insider trading. Kimbal is a director at Tesla, a board member. 3. Elon Musk is under pressure to pump Dogecoin. Someone wrote on Twitter the other day that Dogecoin will reach one dollar by the end of this year. Tesla 's artificial intelligence, Optimus, replied, "Unrealistic. Dogecoin will be 0.45 cents by the end of 2021. When asked for an explanation for the claim, he said "there is not enough fiat going to Dogecoin". I am really thinking here, but I can't guess what's going to happen. Can you? Not investment advise. All the videos on the channel are published for educational and entertainment purpose only. The content creators of the YouTube channel “Vee”, shall not be liable for any damage or cost of any type arising out of, or in any way connected, with your use of the information provided in the videos. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4SiZa6-3ys

Dogecoin has become a global movement. Millions of people around the world believe that this cryptocurrency will become the currency of the planet Earth, and maybe even Mars. In this they are supported by Elon Musk, Mark Cuban, Snoop Dogg, Gene Simmons, Kevin Jonas. As the movement gathers more and more people, the price of Dogecoin is getting higher and higher. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEyDOrBl9vg