Published By
Created On
9 Dec 2022 13:31:38 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
The Ontology of Language What is a CONCEPT? Part Two.?
?WORD ONTOLOGY: ALL WORDS RESOLVE TO EITHER AN OBJECT OR A CONCEPT?
All words can be grouped into two distinct categories by way of their resolved ontology: OBJECTS or CONCEPTS. But how do we accomplish this?
Q: Since all words are first and foremost lexical concepts, how do we reference a rock in our sentences? Wouldn’t the rock be a concept?
Answer: No! This issue is resolved objectively by way of ontology. Opinion plays no role here. It is the ontology of the referent (i.e. that which a word refers to) which determines whether the word in question will be categorized as either an object or a concept.
The word “rock”, in and of itself, is obviously a lexical concept. We already explained previously that atomic brain activity is the referent of any lexical concept, like “concept” or “rock”; i.e. the referent is a verb or process (i.e. a concept!) That’s why all words are concepts in and of themselves. And this is what our brain does when we parse a sentence from a syntactical point of view, as sentential syntax strictly deals with concepts. But we don’t derive the meaning of words and sentences from syntax. Surely, there must be objects out there like rocks, planets, and stars which are not just the petty linguistic syntax of our brain activity. These are objects which must have their own physical presence because they exist, right?
Of course, in order to consistently resolve this issue, we need to consider such words in their proper context. This means that we must evaluate the REFERENT of the word in question (i.e. “rock”) as this is what ultimately allows us to resolve its underlying ontological context. And this is exactly what we did previously when we evaluated the referent of the lexical concept “concept” as a process of atomic brain activity; i.e. a concept! But in our current case, the referent of the word “rock” does not resolve to a concept or a process of brain activity. It specifically resolves to a standalone object. Why?
Because all objects have shape! This is the only objective criterion which can be consistently used to determine whether the referent of a word is either an object or a concept (i.e. a relation or process). When we evaluate the word in question, we ask:
Q: “Does the Ontological Context of its Referent have a shape?”
If so, then the word in question resolves to an object; otherwise, it’s a concept. Since a rock (i.e. referent) has a shape, then the word “rock” is placed in the category we call: OBJECTS.?
f?tf?st ✊? 2014
https://discover.hubpages.com/education/The-Ontology-of-Language-What-is-a-CONCEPT.
#Ontology #Concept #Thought #Language #F?tF?st
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oda5GgNyquo
All words can be grouped into two distinct categories by way of their resolved ontology: OBJECTS or CONCEPTS. But how do we accomplish this?
Q: Since all words are first and foremost lexical concepts, how do we reference a rock in our sentences? Wouldn’t the rock be a concept?
Answer: No! This issue is resolved objectively by way of ontology. Opinion plays no role here. It is the ontology of the referent (i.e. that which a word refers to) which determines whether the word in question will be categorized as either an object or a concept.
The word “rock”, in and of itself, is obviously a lexical concept. We already explained previously that atomic brain activity is the referent of any lexical concept, like “concept” or “rock”; i.e. the referent is a verb or process (i.e. a concept!) That’s why all words are concepts in and of themselves. And this is what our brain does when we parse a sentence from a syntactical point of view, as sentential syntax strictly deals with concepts. But we don’t derive the meaning of words and sentences from syntax. Surely, there must be objects out there like rocks, planets, and stars which are not just the petty linguistic syntax of our brain activity. These are objects which must have their own physical presence because they exist, right?
Of course, in order to consistently resolve this issue, we need to consider such words in their proper context. This means that we must evaluate the REFERENT of the word in question (i.e. “rock”) as this is what ultimately allows us to resolve its underlying ontological context. And this is exactly what we did previously when we evaluated the referent of the lexical concept “concept” as a process of atomic brain activity; i.e. a concept! But in our current case, the referent of the word “rock” does not resolve to a concept or a process of brain activity. It specifically resolves to a standalone object. Why?
Because all objects have shape! This is the only objective criterion which can be consistently used to determine whether the referent of a word is either an object or a concept (i.e. a relation or process). When we evaluate the word in question, we ask:
Q: “Does the Ontological Context of its Referent have a shape?”
If so, then the word in question resolves to an object; otherwise, it’s a concept. Since a rock (i.e. referent) has a shape, then the word “rock” is placed in the category we call: OBJECTS.?
f?tf?st ✊? 2014
https://discover.hubpages.com/education/The-Ontology-of-Language-What-is-a-CONCEPT.
#Ontology #Concept #Thought #Language #F?tF?st
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oda5GgNyquo
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
English
More from the publisher
100,000,000.00 LBC
VIDEO
CARL
carl
Mary Bancroft, to provide psychological profiles of Hitler and the German psyche.
Dulles met with him on several occasions; Eisenhower read his report before the final invasion of Germany.
It is quite difficult to track down this information; some of it can be found in the furnished links at the bottom of the post. It was Deidre Barr, in Jung, a Biography, who first reported this information.
In Jung: A Biography,. author Deirde Bair tells us that Jung was “Agent 488″. He secretly worked for the Office of Strategic Services, which was the predecessor to the CIA. His first contact with the OSS was through his patient Mary Bancroft. She worked for Allan Dulles who was the OSS chief in Switzerland and later became the first Director of the CIA. In 1941, during World War II, Jung’s job was to analyze the psychology of leaders. In return Jung became privy to top-secret Allied intelligence. In 1945, General Dwight Eisenhower read Jung’s ideas for persuading the German public to accept defeat. Allan Dulles relied on Jung’s psycholgical advice, including Jung’s prediction that Hitler would kill himself. Later, Dulles said that “nobody will probably ever know how much Professor Jung contributed to the Allied cause during the war… [and that his work needed to remain] highly classified for the indefinite future.”
On one of these trips, Hyde traveled from Lyon to just inside the Swiss border where he was met by car by Mary Bancroft. Mary got out of the car; kissed Henri on both cheeks, and drove off in another car with a man. Hyde drove Mary’s car to the Geneva Airport, picked up Paul Mellon (O.S.S.-MO) who had just flown in from England. Hyde drove Mellon to a beautiful old hotel overlooking Lausanne where Jung was waiting for him upstairs in a hotel room. Mellon’s mission was to hear Jung’s psychoanalysis of Hitler’s mind and the German collective unconscious. Hyde waited for Mellon in the hotel lobby, then drove Mellon back after his meeting with Jung. Paul and Mary Mellon had been patients of Jung’s since 1938. Mellon wanted to see Jung again during the war; family therapy revisited. Paul and Mary, husband-wife patients of Jung, had raved to their brother-in-law OSS Station Chief London, David Bruce, who had married Paul’s sister Aisle, about Jungian psychoanalysis.
https://jungcurrents.com/carl-jung-spy-488#.
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
BRIAN
brian-????????
Brian Randolph Greene (born February 9, 1963) is an American theoretical physicist, mathematician, and string theorist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Greene.
#Shorts #theoretical #mathematician
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=404nNzkNGms
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
CONSP
conspiracy-castle-vs.-mctoon
Conspiracy Castle
https://youtu.be/ioGeJqbVUiY.
Modern-Day Debate
https://youtube.com/c/ModernDayDebate.
Edit: Michael Khan
https://youtu.be/BVJ-WUcyrlc.
Clown/McFlatty
https://www.youtube.com/c/MCToon.
https://youtu.be/Jrq-qsn6vrg.
#Shorts #AlexStein #McFlatty
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUhnytcDelI
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
de
Controlling
VIDEO
CAUTI
Caution-Jason-Breshears
Source @chalkbodyoutline:8 https://www.youtube.com/@chalkbodyoutline.
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
COMED
comedian-in-a-lab-coat?
Why Bill Nye Is Not a Scientist, and Why It Matters
https://youtu.be/X0upiWqSZv8.
"Bill Nye is thirsty" by afagen is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
"CNN is using 'Bill Nye, the Science Guy' to explain the nuclear disaster in Japan. Like the Windows phone commercial, all I can say is 'Really??'" by Jim's Photo World is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0
By the end of this century, if emissions keep rising, the average temperature on Earth could go up another 4 to 8 degrees. What I'm saying is the planet's on fucking fire. There are a lot of things we could do to put it out. Are any of them free? No, of course not—nothing's free, you idiots. Grow the fuck up. You're not children anymore. I didn't mind explaining photosynthesis to you when you were 12, but you're adults now and this is an actual crisis. Got it? Safety glasses off, motherfuckers.
— Bill Nye, Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, May 12, 2019,
#Shorts #Science #Guy
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxAQdyEw5-g
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
A MAN
A-man-of-principle-o
Detective Watkins: You're looking at four years, maybe five. Do you know that drug traffickers actually serve those sentences?
Bradley Thomas: I'm aware that the system is harder on guys that distribute drugs than it is on men who commit acts of violence against women and children. Do you think that's fair?
A former boxer-turned-drug runner lands in a prison battleground after a deal gets deadly.
Director
S. Craig Zahler
Writer
S. Craig Zahler
Stars
Vince Vaughn Jennifer Carpenter Don Johnson Clark Johnson
#shorts #VinceVaughn #ClarkJohnson #Zahler
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
LOOKI
looking-for-the-truth-(true-level-?
Music from Buster, please Subscribe https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjMCBvpCyk6o6yMXQpAM3EA.
Try Thinking, please Subscribe https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5FFVaRRYgH8jFhLLVwwapA.
Check out the website http://onthelevel.live.
Rick and Morty is an American adult animated science fiction sitcom created by Justin Roiland and Dan Harmon for Cartoon Network's nighttime programming block, Adult Swim. The series follows the misadventures of cynical mad scientist Rick Sanchez and his good-hearted but fretful grandson Morty Smith, who split their time between domestic life and interdimensional adventures.
Roiland voices the eponymous characters, with Chris Parnell, Spencer Grammer and Sarah Chalke voicing the rest of Rick and Morty's family. The series originated from an animated short parody film of Back to the Future, created by Roiland for Channel 101, a short film festival co-founded by Harmon. The series has been acclaimed by critics for its originality, creativity and humour.
The quote comes from the episode “Morty’s Mind Blowers,” the 8th episode of the 3rd season. The episode deals with both Rick and Morty (voiced by Justin Roiland) trying to recover their memories. The duo is locked in a vault that has stored most of their memories they wished to forget (or, in some instances, were forced to forget). One of the “memories” has Morty trying to put up a shelf but Rick disparages Morty because he was using an ordinary level. Rick then creates a platform that is “true level” and Morty, as he steps into it, is so enraptured by the feeling. This is when Rick delivers the quote.
Geek wisdom: Science and our current knowledge of what is a fact, is constantly evolving. What you currently know may not be the truth or, at the very least, not the whole truth. You might have to keep an open mind to new thoughts and ideas. -mygeekwisdom.com.
True-Level
Adj. The state of something or someone being absolutely perfect. Originally used on Rick and Morty to show off the absolute flatness of a platform he designed. Experiencing something true-level would cause feelings of extreme euphoria, and serious withdrawal symptoms and distortion of reality when moved away from it. -urbandictionary.com
So So you get a general idea.
Not quite.
It’s basically an endless string of callbacks to All right, save it for Youtube.
I’ll keep looking for clues.
What are you doing? You want your shelf level or not? And if I say yes, you’re gonna provide that for me with that? Yes, see the bubble? I’m familiar with the bubble, Morty.
I also dabble in precision, and if you think you can even approach it with your sad, naked, caveman eyeball and a bubble of [BLEEP] air, you’re the reason this species is a failure, and it makes me angry! You’re drunk.
You want to put up a shelf, put up a shelf.
You want to experience true level? Do you? Y-yes.
Ugh, all right, come on.
Wow, it’s so Oh, oh, oh, oh, my God, oh, Christ, ooh, ooh, ooh, ahh.
Oh, yeah, true level, bitch.
Morty, come on, we’re leaving for school.
Oh, everything’s crooked! Reality is poison! I want to go back! I hate this! What’s his deal? Can’t live like this! Shh, shh, shh, shh, Morty, Morty, Morty.
Go to school, Summer.
I’ll go in Morty’s memory and do a little Lambs to the cosmic slaughter! Well? You seem to be in charge of what I get to remember.
Why? Good question.
Morty, I need darkness to prime these optical inductors.
Hit the leftmost light switch by the door for me.
The left.
Okay, lights on.
true level
noun
an imaginary surface everywhere perpendicular to the plumb line, or line of gravity.
a hypothetical surface that is perpendicular at every point to the plumb line, such as the mean sea level or geoid: still liquid surface is at the true level
BRITISH DICTIONARY
true level
n
(Physical Geography) a hypothetical surface that is perpendicular at every point to the plumb line, such as the mean sea level or geoid: a still liquid surface is at the true level.
thefreedictionary
#Shorts #RickandMorty #Thinking #Try #level #Buster #scientist #Rick #Morty
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCX0g0EMroY
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
AIR S
air-smoke-water-...
ᴀɪʀ ? ꜱᴍᴏᴋᴇ ♨️ ᴡᴀᴛᴇʀ ?
#Old #science #test
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoN-BEcUNtc
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
JIM A
jim-al-khalili-on?big-bang?-time
??? ??-??????? on Big Bang time travel and dark matter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Al-Khalili.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_travel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter.
#Hypnotism #Al #Khalili
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXcemJWev8Y
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4