http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/allfours/
The argument between theism and atheism is similar to the argument between auditory primacy over graphic primacy, Yet Hellen Keller made neither dominate as she couldn't and underscored both via her bonding with grammar through touch.
Using her remaining senses and feeling, smelling & tasting difference she Awoke
Corey's whole gig seems to me to be a combing over the World into the bloated auditory realm, and covering up with this bloating the grounded visual distinctiveness of font, color & style found from the eye. In doing this he only impresses virtue of sound over and above the magnificent if not also "divine" awe and beauty of our retinal cravings.
And so a promotion of what is the illusion and what is not is left to whomever sees it as such and becomes relative as I am like and dislike my cousin & sibling.
Primacy of audio, voice to ear communication predominates throughout Anton's love of communications.
Audio is preferred over syntax and demonstration of glyph then space then glyph again.
Virtue arises from ignoring one thing, one way, and inviting another way, yet the inevitability of THIS OTHER way is quite apparently present for access as well. This is the paradox and it is this never outsidedness in conjunction with preference which places any adherence to the world as within (dis)ambiguity.
To ignore entirely the grapheme /graphic markings of language and find meaning not from the syntax or glyph and make important or to only find meaning in the mind or in transcendence or in supposed "ambiguity" is to overlook the ground from which literacy and A/THE MEANING of THE READ of any topic or item of discourse comes into play. This is to say that Helen Keller used touch, to replace both what the sighted and hearing people took for granted within their DIVINE musings of music contra to graphic preferences.
She Hellen Keller is radically radically different in her being to us, then we are to one another, and yet her politics her work shows her boundedness her commonness with all of us.
Grammar is a part of the WHOLEness of language and in grammar we have syntax which can not be swept under the rug entire for the sake of calmness of auditory musings.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4X1o7hsfiPE
Brainpolice2 has already noted that this video is more or less a response to a recent video he posted.
Just meandering around verbally to speak about opposition of pyramidical shapes as symbolic rudiments of language which are said to lay over our being & manifest it's star like ways into our life & language. Hierarchical structures of human drives & spiritual growth. Chakras baby....... chakras.
An inversion of one's hierarchical ways seems to point to one's viscera, one's non-nihilism.
The upward point is the Ubber minch the lower point is being human.... all too human.
The contortion from rigid ways to curved ways is similar to drawing a 1 then a 2 then a 3. Rudiments of syntax.
How they attempt to draw from historic or derivative ideas to make a stew of something.
Oh. thanx to Azrienoch and WorldPeace and Tarouk for shooting the shiiiiieeeete with me to get an idea for this tard like vid.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWuKURBJJzI
My discourse on ideality found or framed defining the past to present relationship and the margins of presence becoming unconscious while intention becomes the future present.
See the work of Henry Staten for similar considerations.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T0tJ3sXnRA