An old video from 2011 but it's one of the first videos on the youtube search for 'slut shaming' so I figured I should point out some of its issues and errors (one could almost say the things that make it 'problematic') to prevent it from misleading any soul trying to follow the feminist message of 'educate yourself'. I also find it somewhat amusing that this video is supposed to be about 'slut-shaming' yet actually spends most of its time discussing rape and general violence and crime statistics which are not the same thing. Orignal video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy11i-054Dk Women Slut shame: http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/5/29/slut-shaming-study.html http://thoughtcatalog.com/james-b-barnes/2014/09/new-study-proves-that-men-dont-slut-shame-rich-women-do/ Bullshit studies: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=74747 http://www.fearus.org/rape-survey-image.html 9/10 raped were women: https://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/sexual-assault-victims http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv03.pdf You should always film your group sex so you don't get accused of rape: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/5355966.stm http://news.stv.tv/west-central/289293-scott-robertson-gary-mcdougall-cleared-of-raping-woman-after-party/ Women still 'slut shame' and bitch at each other even without the patriarchy present: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html Camille Paglia Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIomA2MQNI4 "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etz7LndoRjo

A quick run through of why this study is terrible and people shouldn't take it in anyway seriously at all. Suffice to say this study finds that less 80% of people you encounter online will even talk to you and then that less than 1% of all online interactions will be 'sexist'. Mental gymnastics and statistical manipulation ensues to get that figure up to 13% all while claiming that 'sexism is rampant in online environments'. The double think and denial is crazy. This study is the perfect example of starting with a conclusion before doing your work and also highlights why things like sociology are rarely taken seriously as sciences. Sources: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131613 Progressive journalist nonsense that resulted: http://www.wired.com/2015/07/gamers-troll-women-literally-losers/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/07/20/men-who-harass-women-online-are-quite-literally-losers-new-study-finds/ This tripe was funded: https://twitter.com/mombot/status/625844545406676992 "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK8NwZPLqBw