DOES FAMILY COURT FOSTER ANTI SOCIAL PSYCHOPATHIC BEHAVIORS AMONG FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS - 10 of 13
This set of thirteen videos contained segments from an interview that I did with Dr. David O'Connor about the grave deficiencies in our Texas anti-Family Courts. David is a 25-year plus adolescent psychologist and is considered an expert in his field.
SHOULD PERJURY BE PROSECUTED AGAINST A PERSON AND HIS OR HER ATTORNEY WHEN THEY FILE A FALSE PROTECTIVE ORDER?
Perjury, the act of intentionally making false statements while under oath, is a serious offense that undermines the integrity of the justice system. It has always been a hotly debated topic whether or not perjury should be prosecuted against a person and their attorney when they file a false protective order.
A protective order or a restraining order is a court-issued order that requires a person to stay away from another person to prevent them from physical or emotional harm. While these orders offer legal protection to the victim, they can also be misused to manipulate the court system, harass, or intimidate someone.
In some cases, individuals file false protective orders to gain an advantage in a custody battle, get revenge, or as a way to harass someone. In such instances, the person filing the false order and their attorney often provide misleading or false information while under oath, amounting to perjury.
Filing a false protective order not only wastes court resources but can also have a devastating effect on the person accused of wrongdoing. The consequences of being accused of abuse or harassment can be severe, including losing their job, housing, and even facing criminal charges.
Therefore, it is essential to take perjury seriously and prosecute those who file false protective orders, along with their attorneys. Doing so would deter individuals from misusing protective orders and setting a precedent that such behavior is not acceptable in the eyes of the law.
In conclusion, prosecuting perjury against a person and their attorney when they file a false protective order is important for preserving the integrity of the justice system and protecting innocent individuals from false accusations. With fair and just legal proceedings, we can ensure that victims of abuse and harassment are protected while maintaining the rights of those falsely accused.
#FalseAndFrivolousProtectiveOrders #PunishPerjury #LeslieLevy
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKVsfwvEj7I
DID FAMILY COURT CORRUPTION AND MALICIOUS OR NEGLIGENT ATTORNEYS CONTRIBUTE TO THE MURDER OF CHAD READ?
On November 5, 2021, Chad Read, a father who was merely trying to pick up his son for the weekend, was maliciously and cold-bloodedly murdered in Lubbock, Texas, by his ex-wife's boyfriend and employer, Kyle Carruth. Kyle was not taken in for questioning by the Lubbock police, but remained free, as he is to this day.
In this second video, Chad's wife, Jennifer, discussed how Chad had gone to and pay thousands of dollars for mediation in order to obtain extended Thursday evening visitation and the "right of first refusal" with his children. What this meant is that instead of having a two-hour visit with his children, such as many non-custodial parents in Texas get, his children would stay overnight with him on Thursday, and when his ex-wife went out of town, the children would stay with him - not with a grandmother or with a babysitter - unless Chad refused to exercise that right. His ex-wife agreed to these provisions, but his ex-wife's attorney did not file the appropriate paperwork - and his attorney did not challenge things - so his ex-wife was enabled to keep the children from Chad or use them as pawns to manipulate and abuse Chad and the system. Had the attorneys done their job, the murder of Chad Read likely would not have happened.
As a result of this injustice, a group was formed calling for #JusticeForChadRead.
#MurderInLubbock #RightOfFirstRefusal
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV0oLmrEUXM
House Bill 2581 was a bill that would allow the court to order a parent to pay childcare expenses if the other parent were to go back to school to pursue a certificate or degree. Like many bills that appear good on the surface, a little probing revealed a lack of clarity and major weaknesses and unfairness in this bill.
One of the major questions was why a parent should have to pay ANY childcare expenses if he or she - or a family member - were able to provide childcare. Why not make it mandatory that the right of first refusal be given to the other parent in this situation?
Other suggestions included providing for 50-50 equal shared parenting, which would give both parents equal time to pursue additional education or job training; allowing the parent with the stable job to be the primary parent during the time the other parent pursued additional education or job training; adopting a shared-income model of child support; and inquiring about whether the Texas Workforce Commission or a college or university provided free childcare.
0:13 - Representative Harold Dutton Introduces the Bill
1:50 - Testimony of Anti-Family Divorce Attorney Lobbyist Steve Bresnen
3:55 - Testimony of Charles Suis
5:00 - Testimony of David Green
7:35 - Testimony of Delilah Crosby
9:20 - Testimony of Jeffrey Morgan
11:50 - Testimony of Brandon Johnson
13:50 - Testimony of Taran Champagne
16:10 - Representative Harold Dutton Closes
16:30 - Question from Committee Member David Cook
17:10 - Representative Harold Dutton Closes
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dldMHjQcbiI
In this segment, seven individuals testified before the Juvenile Justice and Family Issues Committee AGAINST the House Bill 1734, one of the worst bills of this past session, sponsored by Texas Representative Jeff Leach.
Testimony of Arnold Yan - 0:03
Testimony of Cody Taylor - 1:55
Testimony of Jeff Morgan - 4:08
Testimony of Taran Champagne - 11:27
Testimony of Carlos Daman - 16:27
Testimony of Brandon Johnson - 19:14
Testimony of David Green - 22:28
Fortunately, Chairman Harold Dutton killed this horrendous bill on the very last day of the legislative session.
#ProPromiscuityBill #jeffleach #HouseBill1734
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTU2jcFjMtI
On January 27, 2022, Texas Senator Ted Cruz spoke at an event sponsored by the Dallas Jewish Conservatives. I videotaped Senator Cruz and edited his presentation into 13 segments.
This is segment 6 of 13.
#TedCruz #DallasJewishConservatives
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IwRtw-zaMk
WHY ARE TEXAS FATHERS FIGHTING FOR THEIR CHILDREN?
We all know that fathers play such an important role in the lives of their children, as they provide love, support, guidance, and protection. However, in Texas fathers often face challenges that threaten their relationship with their children, such as separation or divorce, custody battles, child support disputes, and other legal issues.
In these instances, it is critical for fathers to unite and fight for their children, as their involvement in their children's lives can have profound positive effects on their emotional, cognitive, and social development. Studies have shown that children who have a strong relationship with their father are more likely to have better academic performance, improved self-esteem, greater social competence, and fewer behavioral problems than those who don't.
Many fathers believe that the legal system is biased against them. Data from the Texas Office of the Attorney General indicate that their belief is not unjustified, as they lose primary custody of their children and over 88 percent of the time and are looked upon merely as a wallet to pay child support. Texas Family Code 201.107(c) says that “the presiding judges and the Title IV-D agency shall act and are authorized to take any action necessary to maximize the amount of federal funds available under the Title IV-D program,” not what is best for children.
The benefits of a strong father-child relationship cannot be overstated, and fathers who prioritize their involvement in their children's lives can positively impact their children in a multitude of ways.
1. Emotional stability: Children who have an involved father are more likely to have a sense of security and emotional stability. This is because fathers provide a different type of nurturing and support than mothers, which can balance out the child's emotional needs.
2. Confidence and self-esteem: A father's involvement and encouragement can help boost a child's confidence and self-esteem. Fathers who are actively involved in their children's lives can help them build a sense of identity and purpose, which can have a positive impact on their mental health.
3. Positive role model: Fathers are important role models for their children, especially boys. Having a father as a positive influence can teach children important values and behaviors that they will carry with them throughout their lives.
4. Academic success: Studies have shown that having a father in a child's life can lead to better academic performance and higher educational attainment. This is because fathers can provide academic support, encouragement, and help foster a love of learning.
5. Physical health: Children who have an involved father are more likely to be physically healthy. This is because fathers can provide guidance and support around healthy habits, such as exercise, healthy eating, and self-care.
Fathers who fight to take an active role in their children's lives know that they can create a bond with their children that lasts a lifetime and have a lifelong impact on their children’s well-being and success. It's important for fathers not merely to take an active role in their children's lives and to provide the love, support, and guidance that their children need to thrive, but to stand up and fight against an abusive and exploitative legal system that damages their relationship with their children and may negatively impact their children for life. As a result of the anti-father bias in Texas, are uniting to fight for their parental rights and for the right of their children to have BOTH parents actively involved in their lives.
https://www.ntd.com/ntd-good-morning-full-broadcast-aug-15-2_936424.html, starting at approximately 35:30.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCyGYJunVCc
Clip 32 of a series of 41 short clips from a presentation given by Dr. Stephen Baskerville, in which he criticizes the unconstitutionality, brutality, and buffoonery of the unilateral no-fault divorce system that operates in the United States.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWzDOvFJT7Q
NOTE: Due to the background noise of the surroundings, the sound quality is not great, but it understandable.
Stuart McMullen is one of the men who drove almost 200 miles to support Rustin Wright in his hearing in Parker County before Graham Quisenberry. Stuart has been to the capitol on multiple occasions to lobby for legislation to help parents and children who go through the atrocious family court system, and he has sat in on numerous "family" court proceedings to support people who have to face corrupt and abusive judges and attorneys. When Stuart asserts that judges retaliate against attorneys and individuals and that people lose in court because their attorneys are afraid of the judges and judicial retaliation, he speaks as one who has witnessed the phenomena on multiple occasions.
#CleanUpTheFamilyCourtSwamp
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5wZr0mSrKE
THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE TITLE IV-D PROGRAM: COST RECOVERY and COST AVOIDANCE
The original intent of the Title IV-D program was indeed focused on cost recovery for the states and cost avoidance. When Title IV-D of the Social Security Act was established in 1975, its primary aim was to reduce the financial burden on the states and federal government by ensuring that noncustodial parents contribute financially to the upbringing of their children. The program was designed to:
Cost Recovery to the States: Recover the costs of public assistance payments made to custodial parents and their children. When a custodial parent receives welfare benefits, the state seeks to obtain reimbursement from the noncustodial parent, thereby recovering the costs of these benefits. This mechanism reduces the financial load on welfare programs funded by state and federal resources.
Cost Avoidance: Prevent future welfare dependency by ensuring that noncustodial parents fulfill their financial responsibilities. By establishing and enforcing child support orders, the program aims to provide a stable source of income for families that might otherwise turn to public assistance. This proactive approach helps in avoiding additional costs to welfare programs.
The mechanism behind Title IV-D was to create a systematic way for child support enforcement that would, in turn, lead to reduced reliance on welfare by ensuring that both parents contribute to the financial support of their children. This was not just about providing financial assistance to children but also about holding noncustodial parents accountable and reducing the financial burden on state and federal welfare systems.
WHAT ASSUMPTIONS WERE THE TITLE IV-D PROGRAM BUILT ON?
1. Women CANNOT get work outside the home.
2. Women were EXPECTED to stay home with the kids.
3. Women were UNABLE to sustain themselves without the assistance of the government or a man.
4. Men are ALWAYS the primary wage earner.
5. Dads DO NOT participate in the upbringing of the kids.
6. All unmarried dads are deadbeats.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjsQmV-CMKA