Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died setting off more fireworks in an already explosive and intense political environment. Of course, Justice Ginsburg’s death opens up a vacancy on the Supreme Court with only six weeks left to go before the 2020 presidential election. This has sparked predictable controversy regarding the nomination and confirmation of her successor. And people are losing their minds. #RBG #SCOTUS If you enjoyed the video, I'd really appreciate if you'd consider SUBSCRIBING and SHARING THIS VIDEO. It's by far the best way you can help me out. ► CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL: https://tinyurl.com/y2gwz6t9 ► CLICK HERE TO FOLLOW ME ON PARLER: https://tinyurl.com/y3phyce8 ► SUBSCRIBE TO MY BITCHUTE CHANNEL (UNCENSORED VIDS): https://tinyurl.com/y58c27b3 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NwcnINX2q0

I think criticism of the far left and the Democratic establishment will intensify with Trump presumably out of the picture. Here's why. If you enjoyed the video, I'd really appreciate if you'd consider SUBSCRIBING to the channel and SHARING this video. It's by far the best way you can support my work. ► CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL: https://tinyurl.com/y2gwz6t9 ► CLICK HERE TO FOLLOW ME ON PARLER: https://tinyurl.com/y3phyce8 ► SUBSCRIBE TO MY BITCHUTE CHANNEL (UNCENSORED VIDS): https://tinyurl.com/y58c27b3 #Biden #Democrats #TwitterReplyGuy ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgnU9oGYlkc

If you enjoyed the video, I'd really appreciate if you'd consider SUBSCRIBING and SHARING THIS VIDEO. It's by far the best way you can help me out. ► CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL: https://tinyurl.com/y2gwz6t9 ► CLICK HERE TO FOLLOW ME ON PARLER: https://tinyurl.com/y3phyce8 A few days ago I rewatched a talk that Jordan Peterson gave at the oxford union back in 2018. An idea that he shared during the Q&A portion in response to one of the students’ questions really got me mulling over the phenomenon of ideology, particularly in the realm of politics. Peterson was making a point in the context of a question about free speech and hate speech, but I think something more general, and in some ways, profound can be abstracted or generalized from Peterson’s idea. I’ll play part of the clip of Peterson’s answer, but just to summarize: a student asked, what I think, is a very well reasoned question which was: if one of the primary purposes of the freedom of speech is the recognition that the more voices and opinions that are heard, the more likely we are, collectively, to arrive at the truth, what are we to do about certain speech that is so offensive, so degrading to a person that the target of that speech is made to feel they don’t belong and are not welcome in public discourse that they refrain from contributing their ideas resulting in their views being absent from the public dialogue thereby detracting from the pursuit of truth. Put another way, the question is: given that free speech is not a value in itself, but is only valuable in service of a purpose, that purpose being arriving at the truth through competing ideas and robust debate, could it not make sense to forbid certain types of speech because they contribute nothing towards this goal and, in fact, detract from it. This is the notion of the marketplace of ideas, a concept developed by before the enlightenment, then picked up and expounded upon by enlightenment thinkers and perfected by thinkers such as John Stuart Mill in his book “On Liberty”. Jordan’s answer was very interesting. He did not deny that hate speech does exist, that it’s a problem and that it could have precisely the negative impact the student was pointing out. So what do you do about it? Jordan suggested that you let those who wish to utter hateful speech do so and let everyone hear them bc that’s the best way to make sure what they’re saying will be understood and rejected. He points out that, of course, this presumes that the population of people who will hear that speech is wiser than it is foolish. If we don’t assume that, then there’s no justification for the assertion that the ideas will be rejected by allowing them to be heard out in the open. Notwithstanding this, Jordan DOES ac ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFxNCvXZYEg

Dan Crenshaw was on Fox news sharing some thoughts on why you should be suspicious about opposition to in-person voting with an ID. ? If you enjoyed the video, I'd really appreciate if you'd consider SUBSCRIBING and SHARING THIS VIDEO. It's by far the best way you can help me out. ► CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL: https://tinyurl.com/y2gwz6t9 ► CLICK HERE TO FOLLOW ME ON PARLER: https://tinyurl.com/y3phyce8 ► SUBSCRIBE TO MY BITCHUTE CHANNEL (UNCENSORED VIDS): https://tinyurl.com/y58c27b3 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2pbaDLtaLY