People who are accustomed to the civic-liberal concept of “nationhood” often fail to realize or deceptively refuse to admit that a nation is not just a state or country, it is defined as a group of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language. That said, by the strictest definition of the word, civic liberal projects including the United States are not nations at all, they are more aptly defined as multinational states, because they are made up of several groups of people who do not share descent, history, culture, or language. In other words, their populations are made up of several distinct nations. And so, because civic-liberal projects are not nations, adherents to civic-liberal ideology cannot be aptly referred to as nationalists, nor can their ideology even be defined as nationalism. Instead their ideology is more aptly defined as state multinationalism, a concept similar to the multinational project of the globalist European Union. Civic/liberal projects by their very nature create an open i.e. INCLUSIVE society. This means the project is open and inclusive to everyone, including ethnocultural groups that hold average viewpoints that are completely opposed to the foundational ideology of the project itself. This makes civic liberal projects incredibly vulnerable to external and internal subversion and destruction. Follow me on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/RTMmiXJ5s3uN/ ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWIq7CqgFBM

In May of 1944, about 200,000 Crimean Tatars were loaded onto cattle cars and deported from the Crimea to Uzbekistan by the Soviet NKVD. Stalin accused them of collaborating with Soviet enemies, namely Nazi Germany, during the Second World War. Allegedly, about 8000 Crimean Tatars died resisting the NKVD during the deportation, and tens of thousands are said to have died as a result of their exile. After the war, the event was rarely mentioned by the international community. It was only in the wake of the 2014 Russian annexation of the Crimean Peninsula that the globalist hegemony began characterizing it as a genocide. On 12 December 2015, just months after the annexation, Ukrainian Parliament issued a resolution recognizing this event as a genocide, and established the 18th of May as the "Day of Remembrance for the victims of the Crimean Tatar genocide." The Ukrainian parliament did not officially recognize the Crimean Tatars as the indigenous people of Crimea until after the annexation as well. The whinging and virtue signaling of both the Ukrainians and the Crimean Tatars over the 1944 deportations are laughable when we broaden the historical context of the relationship between the Crimean Tatars and the Slavic world. Once the history is revealed, the reality of the situation begins to make much more sense, and reveals that the Crimean Tatars have absolutely no moral ground on which to stand. Sources: https://www.academia.edu/3706285/Slaves_Money_Lenders_and_Prisoner_Guards_The_Jews_and_the_Trade_in_Slaves_and_Captives_in_the_Crimean_Khanate http://www6.econ.hit-u.ac.jp/areastd/mediterranean/mw/pdf/18/10.pdf http://www.academia.edu/2971600/Slave_Trade_in_the_Early_Modern_Crimea_From_the_Perspective_of_Christian_Muslim_and_Jewish_Sources Michael Khodarkovsky, "Russia's Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500-1800", Indiana University Press, 2002, p. 22. https://web.archive.org/web/20131021092115/http://www.jamestown.org/uploads/media/Crimean_Tatar_-_complete_report_01.pdf ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eVnSmJGwRg

In this video I read my most recent Master’s thesis. I used this thesis for a Master’s program I completed in May of this year. What I argued was that diversity, as an ideology, is a cult, and the way I did this academically was to compare it to one of the most respected and well known criteria used to identify cult tactics and behaviors. The title of my thesis was “A Comparative Analysis of Modern Diversity Ideology Using Criteria from Lifton’s Thought Reform Theory” ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bew0qKo3JFM

Globalists, especially in their most toxic Marxian form, would have us all believe that change which serves to advance their agenda is never unnatural, destructive, evil and avoidable. That the changes they have implemented and continue to implement in pursuit of their objectives are purely natural, constructive, virtuous and inevitable. The idea that the conquest of North America (and all the subsequent consequences) was natural, constructive, virtuous and inevitable was (and still is) known as "manifest destiny." Proponents of Manifest Destiny thought Euro-Americans had an essential i.e. natural duty to redeem and remake (i.e. fundamentally change) the North American continent in their image...from sea to shining sea. They thought it was their destiny to accomplish this. Despite heavily criticizing manifest destiny and both the creation and destruction it left in its wake, the globalist left now consistently frames the engineered invasion and colonization of European-majority nations by non-Europeans as a natural, constructive, virtuous and inevitable change, even when the nations in question are indigenous European homelands, and even though much of the change is objectively regressive. It is an act of unparalleled anti-white hypocrisy. The truth is, our genocide is necessary in the eyes of globalists, for we are the most formidable obstacle in carrying out their plan for the human species. Our eradication would aid in a swifter and more absolute achievement of their vision. The colonization of the West and the subsequent genocide of the European race is the globalist’s manifest destiny. Join me on BitChute! :) https://www.bitchute.com/channel/RTMmiXJ5s3uN/ ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaGXhBhWYtM