The next time you see a "pundit" or "commentator" or "strategist" who's frequently on the mainstream press, do a little research. Few journalists will tell the truth, so start digging. Chances are, they belong to one of these firms, and are playing a role to push certain policies. These aren't necessarily what they believe, but what they are supposed to advance. These "public affairs" agencies are little more than ways to peddle influence towards politicians. Just a thought: maybe all governments are enthusiastically pro-V because their handlers tell them it's a good idea. There's no money in telling others to hold off.... From back in 2020: https://canucklaw.ca/cv-4-gates-foundation-lobbied-trudeau-using-proxies-into-accepting-vaccine-agenda/ https://canucklaw.ca/cv-4b-zakery-blais-ag-lamettis-former-assistant-renews-registration-as-gavi-crestview-lobbyist/ https://canucklaw.ca/cv-4c-crestview-strategys-ashton-arsenault-takes-over-lobbying-for-gavi/ https://canucklaw.ca/cv-5-crestview-strategy-the-lobbying-firm-advocating-for-gavis-vaxx-agenda/

Have to wonder why the most unhinged, freakish looking people are promoted as the head of certain movements..... Is the goal to undermine and subvert real unity, making everyone look crazy in the process?

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith holds off on key promise. Is it possible that she will address the roots of the problem? Sure, it's possible. However, the lack of specifics sounds like capitulation. If Kenney could simply impose a V-pass by decree, why can't she ban it by decree? She has a majority government. Or, is she saving this as an election tactic for May 2023? Source: https://globalnews.ca/news/9309856/danielle-smith-bill-protect-unvaccinated/

I'm going to get some hate from this. Oh well, suck it up.