How was Jesus Buried? William Lane Craig vs. Byron McCane
Historians have discussed the burial of Jesus for a long time. What can we know about it? How did it happen? What kind of burial was it? In this video, we will discuss two views about the sort of burial that Jesus had. The first view is that of Byron McCane, who believes that the burial was a dishonorable one. The second view is that of William Lane Craig, who thinks that the burial was honorable.
Sources
Craig, William Lane. “Was Jesus Buried in Shame? Reflections on B. McCane’s Proposal.” The Expository Times 115 (2004): 404–409.
McCane, Byron R. “‘Where No One Had Yet Been Laid’: The Shame of Jesus’ Burial.” In Authenticating the Activities of Jesus, 431–52. Edited by Bruce Chilton and Craig Evans. Leiden: Brill, 1999.
In this session, we’re going to talk about historical criticism as a discipline in biblical studies. We’ll also talk about its relationship to Christian faith. We’re going to ask a bunch of questions like, “Is it a good way to interpret the Bible?” and “Does it help or hurt Christian faith?”
We have taken a couple of looks at Papyrus Berlin 11710 in the past. It is a small 6th-century piece of an apocryphal gospel. Now, we are going to examine the saying of Jesus in this text and compare it to similar sayings in the Johannine writings (e.g., the gospel and epistles of John).
Sources
Ehrman, Bart, and Zlatko Plese. The Apocryphal Gospels: Texts and Translations. Oxford. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Society of Biblical Literature Greek New Testament.
For the images of the papyrus, I used the Berlin museum papyrus database: https://berlpap.smb.museum/record/?result=0&Alle=11710&lang=en.
Have you ever heard of the Acts of John? The above video provides an overview of this fascinating early Christian text. Written sometime between the year 150 and 250 AD, the Acts of John tells about John's life after the ministry of Jesus, from his work in Ephesus to his preaching about Jesus to his peaceful death. Even though it was heterodox in its Christology, it survived for centuries before it was condemned by the Second Council of Nicaea in 787.
In this presentation, we will talk about one method of interpreting the Bible: the historical. In other videos, we will talk about literary and theological interpretations, so stay tuned for those as well.
Visit jdreiner.com to read or listen to more content and learn about my work.
Email me at jonathandreiner@gmail.com to get in touch.
To donate through PayPal, paste this link into your browser: paypal.me/jonathandreiner
To donate Bitcoin for my work, use this public key: bc1qwnu9exmhp3ugcepvxvhn5tyw765zgeskgfm200
Footnotes from Web Post:
1. For a discussion of the historical method of biblical interpretation, see Michael Coogan, “The Interpretation of the Bible from the Nineteenth to the Mid-Twentieth Centuries,” in the New Oxford Annotated Bible, with the Apocrypha, 5th ed., ed. Michael Coogan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1877.
2. John 1:1-5, KJV; for the original language, see the passage as found in the SBL Greek New Testament: “Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος. οὗτος ἦν ἐν ἀρχῇ πρὸς τὸν θεόν. πάντα διʼ αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο, καὶ χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν. ὃ γέγονεν ἐν αὐτῷ ζωὴ ἦν, καὶ ἡ ζωὴ ἦν τὸ φῶς τῶν ἀνθρώπων· καὶ τὸ φῶς ἐν τῇ σκοτίᾳ φαίνει, καὶ ἡ σκοτία αὐτὸ οὐ κατέλαβεν.”
3. For a discussion of "The Word" in John, see Craig Keener, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1993), 264.
Most people are familiar with Judas Iscariot, the disciple who betrayed Jesus. However, they may not realize that his character is developed a little differently in each gospel. In other words, one gospel will include some details about him, while another includes others. Looking at his character in each gospel alone can tell us a lot about the individual voice that each gospel has for him. In this post, we will explore the person of Judas Iscariot as he appears in the Gospel of Mark. In future posts, we will explore how he is developed in the other gospels, so you will want to stay tuned for the next few weeks to get a full treatment of one of the most demonized characters in the Bible.
Visit jdreiner.com to read or listen to more content and learn about my work.
Email me at jonathandreiner@gmail.com to get in touch.
To donate through PayPal, paste this link into your browser: paypal.me/jonathandreiner
To donate Bitcoin for my work, use this public key: bc1qwnu9exmhp3ugcepvxvhn5tyw765zgeskgfm200
Footnotes from web post:
1. For the date of composition of Mark, see The Gospels, ed. John Barton and John Muddiman (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 85.
2. Mark 3:19, SBL NT; see also the KJV.
3. Mark 14:10-11, SBL NT; see also the KJV.
4. Mark 14:10-11, SBL NT; see also the KJV.
5. Mark 14:17-21, SBL NT.
6. Mark 14:17-21, KJV.
7. Mark 14:43-46, SBL NT.
8. Mark 14:43-46, KJV.
Previously, we talked about reading the Bible from a historical perspective. Today, we are going to talk about the literary interpretation of the Bible. The literary method is different from the historical method because it focuses on reading the texts as they exist now rather than focusing on learning about the past. Here, we are interested in the books of the Bible as works of literature: we want to analyze the plot, setting, characters, vocabulary, sentence structure, literary devices, and other such things.
Visit jdreiner.com to read or listen to more content and learn about my work.
Email me at jonathandreiner@gmail.com to get in touch.
To donate through PayPal, paste this link into your browser: paypal.me/jonathandreiner
To donate Bitcoin for my work, use this public key: bc1qwnu9exmhp3ugcepvxvhn5tyw765zgeskgfm200
Footnotes from Web Post:
1. For a discussion of literary interpretation of the Bible, see Carol A. Newsom, “Contemporary Methods in Biblical Study,” in the New Oxford Annotated Bible, with the Apocrypha, 5th ed., ed. Michael Coogan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1883.
2. Collen Conway, “The Gospel According to John,” in the New Oxford Annotated Bible, 1520; see also Raymond Brown, The Gospel according to John, I-XII (Garden City: Doubleday, 1966).
Modern critics of religion tend to quote Xenophanes. But what did Xenophanes himself write in his own language? This video surveys some of his best quotes in the original Greek and infers what he really thought. It turns out that he didn't have much in common with the modern critics who quote him.