Read This Report: http://www.billstill.com/uncategorized/sr-1352-hillary-clinton-cannot-steal-election-trump/ Visit our website now: http://www.billstill.com - considered by informed insiders’ as THE ultimate resource for fixing the National Debt problem. Good evening, I’m still reporting on Hillary Clinton Cannot Steal the Election From Trump! Fear and trembling still runs rampant throughout Trump supporters - fanned by the MSM - that Hillary Clinton still has any chance of stealing this election back from Donald Trump. The reason for the fear is the tsunami of coercive hate mail that Electoral College members are reporting from in states Trump has won, designed to get enough electors to switch their vote from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton in order to change the obvious results. The Electoral College voting takes place on Dec. 19 – when electors assemble in their respective state capitals. Michael Banerian, 22, of Oakland County, Michigan, is one of Michigan’s 16 official electors who will meet in the state capital of Lansing on that day. He is the Youth Chairman for the Michigan Republican party. He recently told the Detroit News that he has received threatening emails - lots of them - from people trying to coerce him to switch his vote from Trump to Clinton. [insert] He explained that in the Michigan system, even if he did switch his vote for Clinton, it wouldn’t matter: [insert] Of the 57 previous presidential elections in US history, only 22 meetings of the Electoral college have seen a single faithless elector. Only 179 electors have been faithless in voting for the candidate they were pledged to vote for totally in all of our 57 presidential elections. However, of those, 71 changed their votes because the candidate to whom they were pledged died between the election and the meeting of the Electoral College. Another 23 in the 1836 election abstained from voting for Vice-President as a block. That leaves only 84 times where an elector changed their mind. So, a truly faithless elector is very rare. However, the death threats are today rampant across the states Donald Trump won. I won’t go through the lengthy list of threats the electors have faced since the election, just suffice it to say that it has been unprecedented in both the number, and fury, as the forces of leftist globalist idealism, anarchic communism, and radical Islamic terror have all been slapped with a surprise defeat in a single stroke by an indomitable, long-shot candidate, Donald J. Trump. Faithless electors have never changed the outcome of any presidential race to date. Fortunately, Trump’s Monster vote overruled such a Constitutional crisis. But even in this unlikely scenario of a massive rush of faithless electors at this point, there is still one final check the Founders in their wisdom built into the system. After the Dec. 19 vote of the Electoral College meeting in the individual states, the ballots are counted and the results are transmitted to a joint session of Congress which is held on Jan. 6th. So, Congress knows the results of the Electoral College vote from Dec. 19 on. When Congress meets in joint session, it is usually a mere formality of accepting the votes of the states. So, in alphabetical order, the state results are presented. If there is an objection to the results – for example if election fraud was alleged, or coercion of an elector was alleged – this is the time when that is decided: Members of Congress can object to any state’s vote count, provided the objection is presented in writing and is signed by at least one member of each house of Congress. Then Congress would immediately adjourn its joint session and return to their individual chambers to debate and vote on each objection. After that vote, the joint session would be resumed. If the objection is rejected, then that state’s vote count stands as presented to Congress. By this means, the entire deliberative weight of both houses of Congress can be thrown at any issue that may violate the sanctity of the vote for President and Vice President of the United States of America. Yes, Congress would actually decide. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate. Connect with Bill Still: https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3 https://plus.google.com/u/0/+BillStill http://billstills.blogspot.in/ https://twitter.com/billstill https://www.facebook.com/BillStillOfficial https://www.pinterest.com/billstills/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/billstill http://billstills.tumblr.com/ https://billstills.wordpress.com/ https://www.diigo.com/profile/billstill https://www.reddit.com/user/billstills/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/billstillss Consider becoming a cherished sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3204630 https://youtu.be/fMiebsgeIk8

In the past, I have found the fact checking website – Snope s -- a useful source for quickly ferreting out bogus material. However, I’ve heard they are not completely trustworthy in that they have a strong left bias, but have never had occasion to face it head on – until now. Over the last 3 weeks, I produced a series of four YouTubes about the possibility of unvettable immigrants being flown into Pennsylvania on UPS so-called Quick-change or Combi jets. Pennsylvania has the largest population of the 6 states that officially approve of such activity. Nov. 23, 2015 - MM201 – Is UPS Shipping Refugees? Nov. 28, 2015 - SR 462 – UPS Refugee Update Nov. 29, 2015 - SR 463 – UPS Refugee Flights Confirmed Dec. 8, 2015 - SR 470 – UPS Denies Flying in Illegals How this all started out was a few weeks ago, an anonymous person, coming out of a doctor’s appointment across the road from the UPS Cargo terminal at the Harrisburg airport after dark said he was shocked to see hundreds of people deplaning from a UPS cargo jet and immediately being whisked away by chartered busses. He jumped in his car and explained what he had seen as he followed two of the busses, using his cell phone to video what he could. After my second piece appeared on Nov. 28, UPS officially responded in the Comments section of that YouTube: "UPS operates a cargo airlines. The company has not been involved in any passenger flights into or out of Harrisburg, PA, or any other airport. The claims to the contrary are based on misinformation." Interestingly, Steve Gaut is actually the Vice-President of UPS Public Relations. I’ve invited him to link to me on Linked-in so we could discuss this, he hasn’t responded. The worst part of UPS comment is the part I highlighted “or any other airport.” It is impossible for me to believe that Steve does not know that UPS actually ran a passenger airline for a number of years using Quick Change cargo planes. In fact, one of the hubs for the UPS Airlines was in Pennsylvania! Here is a Feb. 20, 2000 story that ran in the Philadelphia Inquirer’s web version, Philly.com: “UPS has operated five of its planes as passenger aircraft since 1997 and has based two in Philadelphia since the spring of 1998 for the weekend use of Apple Vacations and Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines.” Ok, so at least that part of Steve’s statement is … just not right. The Combi aircraft concept has been around in the military for decades and the concept is still in use in the airline industry today. Only 14 months ago, airline executive Satyendra Pandey, of GoAir a low-fare airline based in Mumbai, India wrote an article about Quick Change aircraft for Linked-In: “The QC configuration has been used in … Europe, [the] United States and Canada where airlines operate a passenger flight configuration during the day and fly the same aircraft as cargo aircraft during the off-traffic hours.” But here comes the good part. “Some of the well-known users of such a system are Air Canada, Europe Airpost, and UPS Cargo.” Source: http://tinyurl.com/gu5pu5m So it is possible that UPS still flies Combi aircraft to this day. I explain my reasoning in the other 4 videos, but it’s basically that wascally Obama may be trying to sneak in as many of his buddies as he can in his last year in office, before the doors slam shut. -------- So now Snopes has jumped into the middle of this mess with deeply flawed analysis that dubbed the story: False. Incredibly, the Snopes analyst sweetened the UPS denial quote – to exclude the part that is now a proven falsehood. This story was researched by Brooke Binkowski. By her own account she is an award-winning journalist who has written for – oh my – NPR, CNN, and CBS. Binkowski’s sentence introducing the UPS denial is an interesting piece of contradictory prose. Referring to the anonymous video that kicked all this off, she wrote: “As the video at no time shows people, it is difficult to discern who they are or whether they have actually been loaded onto buses from UPS planes, as the video’s narrator claims.“ Yes, it is difficult to discern who a person is if you can’t see them. And if you can’t see them loaded into busses, how can you be sure they are in the busses? “However, in a statement, a spokesperson from UPS flatly denied that the passengers were unloaded from their planes.” Well, if the UPS spokesman “flatly denied” it, then why even bother to investigate further? But it gets even worse. “The narrator of the video can be heard saying he had just returned from a doctor's appointment; that means he was not getting off a plane.” Uhhh, Brooke, your powers of deduction would put Sherlock Holmes to shame. She presses on with her analysis: Brooke, he wasn’t on the airplane! He was across the road at the doctors office, looking across the road at the airplane stopped next to the hanger on nothing but bare concrete.