"Fake City" Asymmetric Warfare Training Center at Fort A.P. Hill
The "Fake City" at Fort A.P. Hill. Not really as big as it sounds. A lot of the buildings in this video area are part of the training center, and not the simulated Urban Area.
The U.S. Army Asymmetric Warfare Group hosted a ribbon cutting ceremony to celebrate the completion of its Asymmetric Warfare Training Center Jan. 24 at Fort A.P. Hill. Participants included State and local officials from Virginia, representatives from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Training and Doctrine Command, and various others who attended to witness the historic event. The state-of-the-art facility provides a location for the AWG to replicate complex operational environments and develop solutions—which includes exploring adaptive tactics, techniques and procedures.
Jimmy's original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-WDx7byI0k
About 1AM on August the 14th, 2022, Jimmy Church was on the second floor balcony of his house in Palmdale, California, using a night vision device to look for UFOs. He spotted some to the north, and started filming them.
On November 3rd, he shared the video on Twitter and someone (sorry I can't find who) suggested to me that it might be the same Starlink flares that pilots had been seeing and mistaking for planes flying in racetrack patterns.
A starlink flare happens when sunlight reflects off a flat surface on a starlink satellite. These particular flares are reflecting off the bottom of the satellite, which is parallel to the curve of the earth, and so the reflection mostly misses the ground - which is why, up until now, only pilots at high altitudes had reported them. But Jimmy's night vision device was able to see the much dimmer flares that were visible from the ground.
Over on Metabunk we'd noticed that these flares were mostly observed when looking north, towards the big dipper, with the sun directly below the satellites. Due to the tilt of the earth, there's always some satellites that are in sunlight in the summer, when viewed from Palmdale and similar latitudes.
Jimmy gave me the approximate time of the video, and Flarkey used the in-the-sky.org site to get an exact match of two flaring satellites at the start of the video. Flarkey also found the correct historical Starlink position data using space-track.org, and I loaded that into Stellarium
I identified the stars in the video, the bright one on the left is Doo-bee, part of the big dipper, and I used the stars to overlay a screenshot of the video onto Stellarium, set the time, and pressed play.
Result - All of the flaring lights line up with starlink satellites, in the exact same spot, and at the exact same speed.
Interestingly, neither in-the-sky.org nor Stellarium thought that all these satellites would be visible. This is because they are right on the edge of sunlight, so any small variation in the calculated shape of the Earth or errors in accounting for atmospheric refraction, could put a satellite in or out of shadow. But since we see they match perfectly, we know that the sun is actually hitting them. These are all Starlink satellites.
These starlink flares are only dimly visible from the ground, but are a lot brighter seen from 40,000 feet, from a plane. So we are going to continue to get reports of these moving lights from pilots for the next few years until everyone is aware of the issue. So I suggest that the FAA and the airlines issue advisories to air traffic control and to pilots to minimize distractions and disruption. The frequency will lessen over the winter, due to the tilt of the Earth being away from the sun, but if nothing is done then this exact same flurry of reports will flare up again next summer.
Metabunk Thread: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/jimmy-churchs-starlink-ufos-in-palmdale.12751/
Full Synced video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cT7UeZI-6OY
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea8BCl2yVU0
The videos of Billy Meier are widely agreed to just be model, often suspended on strings. Some people still say they are real UFOs, because they can't figure out how to duplicate them. So I spent a few hours looking into it. Turns out it's not that hard.
The string has not been digitally removed, it's fishing line, and is invisible in the original footage, with this early morning light.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnhci9y-xOw
Chris was an F-16 pilot for 18 years. He and I have both done work analyzing UAP videos. We've disagreed on a few points. Here we get together for the first time to discuss those disagreements, the times we agree, and the things that still need figuring out.
00:00 Start, technical difficulties
11:45 Actual Start
13:08 Why did Chris change his mind about FLIR1 shooting off?
29:37 The IR Shape at the Start, Glare?
37:09 Gimbal Roll. Underneath or Sideways
44:07 Why didn't Underwood regain lock?
52:18 Rotating glare in FLIR1 like in Gimbal?
59:53 Can it actually be a glare from a plane?
1:03:48 TV Mode image, a clear Tic -Tac? Perpective.
1:11:20 Gimbal vs. Flir1 gimbal rolls near 0°
1:16:14 Rotation of the light pattern in the sky in Gimbal
1:19:30 The shape of the glare, and does it change as it rotates?
1:21:44 A defined edge - an example with the sun
1:32:10 The "Glowing Aura"
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neTfX9Jx5AY
A contrail formed by Singapore airlines flight SQ7972, a Boeing 747, from Anchorage to Los Angeles, March 25th 2015, 18:36. (00:36 UTC, Mar 26th) Demonstrates the dissolution of the contrail into the hybrid contrails formed in the vortex cores (note there's four engines but only two vortices, as they come from the wings), which then distort with the crow instability. Finally the hybrid contrails break up in an interesting swirly effect.
The video is in real time, the collapse of the vortices is quite quick as the hybrid contrail persists only as long as they are still spinning, which reduces the air pressure, increasing the relative humidity. Once they stop spinning the RH drops below saturation and the cloud evaporates.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5pP6naBcnY
Over the last few years, there's been several "UFO" videos that looked something zipping by a drone. Some people interpreted these as large fast alien spacecraft. But I think these are actually very small slower objects, like birds or insects, that are quite close to the camera, and they just look big and fast because we interpret them as being far away. I call them drone zipbys.
Some people have done computer simulations to show how this illusion can happen, and I plan on doing some myself later. But I always like to do a physical recreation if possible.
I don't have a drone so I started out by throwing some rocks at my camera, and then from behind the camera. Neither of these were very useful as the motion was mostly vertical.
Next, I tried throwing a paper plane on my camera. It was really hard to get close, so I switched to the other side, and after a few goes I finally got one. I played it in reverse. And then sped it up to typical drone speed. I then compared it against the Utah video.
Wanting more control, I tied some fishing line to my gate post and then to my fence below, and made a UFO out of some card and a pen tube. This slid down at about 7 miles per hour. I was able to get it fairly consistently flying by the camera.
Speeded up to 28 miles per hour it's not a bad match for the Utah video.
I wanted to try moving the camera instead of the object. So I got on my bike, holding my phone, and pedaled towards a small UFO hanging from a tree. Unfortunately, it's a bit hard to see. It kind of matches up with Utah video in parts. But so far my zip line recreation is the best I've done.
I should probably just buy a drone.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw2lIUO3Yy8
Paul is a former promoter of the Planet X conspiracy theory, which is also known as the Nibiru cataclysm. Planet X (or Nibiru) is a supposed rogue planet that some people claim they can observe near the sun. Supposedly the existence of this planet is being covered up by the government because it's about to cause the end of the world. There's a wide variety of versions of this theory.
Paul discovered the Planet X theory back in 2013 and became very interested in it. He started posting lots of YouTube videos promoting the theory and warning of the impending apocalypse. He teamed up with two other people, and they created lots of YouTube content as a team. For a long time, he simply ignored all attempts by "debunkers" to explain things to him, but eventually he recognized that the weight of the evidence was against him. This realization came about in large part due to the efforts of one debunker who posts on YouTube and Facebook as "Dazza the Cameraman." Dazza would patiently and politely explain things to Paul.
Paul eventually lost his belief in Planet X and split with his YouTube partners, who immediately branded him a traitor, all of which was very difficult for him. He's now moving on with his life and leaving conspiracy theories behind, but he contacted me because he wanted his story to be told.
"Paul" is not his real name, his voice is altered, and he does not appear in the YouTube version. While anonymity is difficult to keep on the internet, Paul did not want any more footage of himself out there that could be used directly against him, so he's appearing here relatively incognito.
Podcast Page: https://www.tftrh.com/2019/07/06/episode-12-paul-escape-from-planet-x/
Planet X Info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nibiru_cataclysm
Dazza The Cameraman's sites have lots of great debunking of Planet X, and Flat Earth:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/dazzathecameraman/
https://www.youtube.com/user/dazzathecameraman
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yK2B09z-2UU