There was only one series of eleven episodes. 1965 to 2019 is 54 years. Saying some frequency from space is doing whatever's obviously idiotic so can be "read through", TV's come quite some way since this publication but my information is that there's Masonic clues in it which are so rare as to not be picked up by normal Masons let alone anyone else. Apparently that person'd never seen two handshakes in public every before being one of these aspects which would generally denote its importance. Undermind Series Overview Undermind is a science fiction television drama produced by ABC Weekend Television in 1965. It ran for eleven episodes of sixty minutes each. It starred Rosemary Nicols, Jeremy Wilkin and Denis Quilley. The series was devised by Shoestring and Bergerac creator Robert Banks Stewart, who also went on to write for Doctor Who. Several other writers known for their work on Who also contributed scripts: David Whitaker, Bill Strutton and Robert Holmes. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScXV8hasLPs

Odd on two counts. Why send two such similar pretend accounts with such similar approach, so close together in time, on the same video, being so obviously from the same source? Second but just as strange, why doesn't YouTube filter them out as they're links and they're suspicious ones at that and presumably, with them being so short, will be from some kind of link shortening site which is used just for hacking or things that YouTube wouldn't or shouldn't approve of or condone? ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OAirDIzUD4

The Scallywag Magazine article, which accused Lord Alastair McAlpine and Derek Laud of raping teenage boys at a children's home, based on police witness statements and affidavits, is narrated from 30 mins., which challenged them to sue, seems to be not as famous as the public would hope. "Another useful ploy is the false accusation. First, create a situation where you are wrongly accused. Then, at a convenient moment, arrange for the false accusation to be shown to be false beyond all doubt. Those who have made accusations . . . become discredited. Further accusations will then be treated with great suspicion." Lord Alistair McAlpine. This is very similar to the mega story which broke in the US, involving Boy's Town and children being raped by their Republican Party's top politicians. However, as well as murdering the witnesses, as happened in the US, alongside 'discrediting' them, in the case of Pedo McAlpine, there's been a subtle, yet obvious ploy involving lots of other establishment paedophile enablers to carry out what he calls in his book "The False Accusation". This false accusation concept is also being used by many non-political criminals, and is definitely in play at ALPonz, the Aston Lloyd Ponzi Scheme, where there are deliberately sabotaged, faux attacks being made on various conspiring elements, by a wider group of conspiring elements, who seem to be unrelated prior to this happening. Mount an 'attack' that's a deliberate failure, and spin it to look like it proves that someone's been proved innocent in court, when in fact nothing of the sort has happened. Then, all of the plonkers think that any form of attack is a dead end---without ever considering that maybe they need to look at things properly, instead of only taking other peoples' word for it. There are several such 'false accusations' in play, so please think about things with this in mind, then reassess your options, and who you should trust. _*"THE FALSE ACCUSATION AND HOW IT WORKS"*_ 1. It's 'limited hang out'--- people look at _it, the accusation by the cointelpro_, then not at other things which are much more expansive; and, 2. It makes all such accusations look as stupid as my skit at Ben Fellows People who've been watching's opinion becomes that Ben Fellows actually works for them to give them looney cover, or, as the allegedly 'late' Lord Alistair---pedo---McAlpine would say (and actively practised with the SallyBercowPsiOp, where she made insinuations that he was one, then admitted being totally wrong and said that he was totally innocent, then paying him a massive ammount of money (probably she didn't pay anything in reality) in his book, there's great value in the _"False Accusation"_, where you get someo ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdKj9BAF9UY

Following my realization of the depths of Brian Gerrish's Marxist subversion programme not more than a week ago, and working out what wider agenda was in play at the mission to 'arrest a judge' in Birkenhead a couple of years ago, I felt compelled to warn him once again that he was proving to be very irresponsible with regards his avoidance of the CoIntelPro operations which are going to be bought against him. Anyone attending any of Michael's cases who has been sent there by an agent on a false premise is not only in danger themselves, but they can be used to embroil Michael in detrimental controversy, which could have him landed in massive trouble; likely putting him in prison. Michael idiotically thinks that so long as he's 'professional' this can't happen to him. Freeman on the Land 'domestic terrorists' are being lined up for a clamp down. They may be well meaning brainwashees, but whilst under a CoIntelPro disinformation spell rendering them incapable of reason, they are of capacity and will make an excellent scape goat. Michael lets them turn up to his cases and talk about crazy stuff when he's trying to be taken seriously. Under this disjointed mass of confusion, amongst people who don't even know each other or what they're doing, manipulation is very easy and staged events an inevitability. Hopefully this video doesn't haunt him for the duration of a long prison sentence. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1g5hT4IuiE