Brooks McKenzie is a Ph.D. and a recognized expert in parental attachment theory. He does NOT provide custody evaluations or "opinions"; instead, everything that he does it based on scientifically validated models. In this interview, Brooks talks about the impact that disrupting the attachment cycle of a child can have. Not only is it abusive to the child, but it can create a form of brain damage. Yet the family law industry knows NOTHING about attachment theory and regularly creates devastating and even lifelong consequences by disrupting a child's attachment cycle. #BrooksMcKenzie #AttachmentTheory #FamilyLawIndustry ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpU4oV_wac8

I HAVE A FACE - GIVING A FACE TO THE FACELESS VICTIMS OF ABORTION At the National Religious Broadcasters Conference in Grapevine, Texas, Jerry and Michelle Shelfer spoke with me about their ministry helping to heal people who have been impacted and hurt by abortion and "giving a face" to the faceless victims of abortion. Jerry and Michelle spoke of their own healing from abortion - a healing that took years. The two billion faceless victims of abortion need to have a face, and hundreds of millions of people need healing from the tragedy of abortion. For more information about this ministry, go to www.TheFoundlings.net or www.PrepareARoom.com. #IHaveAFace #FindingHealingFromAbortion ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xl61IL5lcLA

Interference with Child Custody is a big problem not only in Texas, but throughout the United States. The "custodial" parent sometimes thinks or acts as if she or he has the right to destroy the child's relationship with the other parent. The issue is so serious that Texas Penal Code 25.03 considers interference a state jail felony. However, this remedy is rarely enforced in Texas, which enables the custodial parent to brainwash and abuse a child and bully, torment, and harass the other parent. In light of this, Texas Representative David Cook proposed House Bill 969, which would permit municipalities the ability to impose civil money penalties of up to $500 on the interfering parent. Eleven individuals testified on this bill and offered positive feedback and critiques. All individuals either supported the bill or were neutral on the bill. NO ONE opposed the bill. All agreed that this bill was a good start to address this problem. Testimony for the individuals is timestamped below: 0:01 - Introduction of House Bill 969 by Representative David Cook 4:25 - Testimony of Taran Champagne 7:00 - Testimony of Brandon Johnson 9:35 - Testimony of Cody Taylor 12:55 - Testimony of Steve Bresnen 22:05 - Testimony of Jeffrey Morgan 25:33 - Testimony of Delilah Crosby 29:20 - Testimony of David Green 30:50 - Testimony of George Saldana 35:45 - Testimony of Kimi Lyn Reed 38:49 - Testimony of David Bellow 42:30 - Testimony of Charles Suis 44:22 - Representative David Cook clarifies the bill, answers questions about the bill, and closes SEVEN PROGRESSIVE REMEDIES OR PUNISHMENTS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR INTERFERENCE WITH CHILD CUSTODY 1. Restoration of Time: When a parent intentionally interferes with the other parent’s parenting time with a child, the parent who interferes should have to restore the time to the other parent. Depending on the circumstances and frequency of interference, a one-to-one, two-to-one, three- to-one, or much higher time swap. 2. Counseling: In cases where the interference was due to mental health issues, the individual may be ordered to attend counseling or therapy to address the underlying issues that led to the interference. 3. Community Service: Another punishment that may be considered for interference with child custody is community service. This may involve the individual performing a certain number of hours of community service, such as working at a local charity or community organization. 4. Fines: Individuals who interfere with child custody may be ordered to pay a fine as a form of punishment. The amount of the fine may vary depending on the severity and frequency of the interference and the jurisdiction in which the offense occurred. 5. Imprisonment: In more severe cases of interference with child custody, the individual responsible may be sentenced to imprisonment. In Texas, Texas Penal Code 25.03 considers interference with child custody an offense against the family and is a state-jail felony. However, this remedy is rarely enforced. 6. Investigation for Child Abuse: When one parent seeks to alienate a child from the other parent, the alienating parent could be investigated for child abuse for seeking to destroy the relationship the other parent has with the child. 7. Loss of Custody/Visitation Rights: Depending on the circumstances of the interference, the individual may be ordered to lose custody or visitation rights with the child on for a temporary or more extended period of time. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhB7RbpLPWc

On March 24, 2021, Texas Representative Steve Toth held a news conference to discuss the need for House Bill 68, the Innocence Protection Act - or more popularly known as the #SaveJames Bill. For all intents and purposes, the bill prevents "professionals" from trying to socially, psychologically, medically, or physically "transition" a minor child from his or her biological sex to another sex. Such actions would be defined as child abuse. It is a sad commentary on our society that such a bill is even necessary. In this testimony, gerontololgist Sarah Jessica Fields says that transgenderism is the largest medical scandal in the history of the world involving children. She reminded people there are vast corporate interests involved in the transgender industry. Why? Because transitioning individuals are medical patients for life, and the drugs involved are very expensive. In other words, some people are getting very rich by selling a lie to society. Video 4 of 7 #SaveJames ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NyNrq6UTTk