From: Suspicious0bservers - https://www.youtube.com/user/Suspicious0bservers
I'll make this easy:
1) Climate science is the result of bias, uncertainty, questionable data- and it can’t account for the past or the future.
2) You account for it with volcanoes and the sun, and you understand it with the geomagnetic and geoelectric systems of earth.
3) Even if these weren’t true, the trends are STILL GOING TO TRIGGER COLD.
4) If they use modern climate models, and don’t fully account for space weather, volcanos, and electromagnetic forcing, they have nothing.
5) This is when they will begin to attack the video, the channel, and me… and you’ve won.
CLIMATE FORCING Playlist https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZcqdt3LK6d66tMreI4gqIC-
RESPONSE TO ALL DETRACTORS: https://youtu.be/aHBDF_3Dk_k
I showed only a TINY fraction of the literature. Find hundreds of relevant papers here in the bibliography: https://spaceweathernews.com/publications/
Thank DARPA for the internet otherwise it would be much harder to get this information out to others so relatively easy. This article exemplifies a most pressing threat to each of us. This is why we need to support and participate in acts of protest and help give rise to a whole new construct that empowers the people not the powers that shouldn't be. Never in our lifetimes has there been such a brazen attempt to force us in to a system of totalitarian control.
Technocracy: The Operating System For The New International Rules-Based Order (1h5m)
This article will unlock peoples's minds. A MUST READ/LISTEN. This is a most comprehensive and easy to follow explanation of the global agenda, including all its actors/participants. It lays bare the irrelevance of what we're being told to think/worry about. It lays out how "Nation States" will become Technates. #Technate refers to an operational area where "experts" manage the technology within that area. Such an area has no nations nor uses money.
Raising awareness leverages our collective capabilities to regain facts based control of the narrative. As we know, he who controls the narrative holds all the cards.
#technocracy
https://bastyon.com/index?v=1c75d43e8cbd538862d8c7fd0ca0f8d855adc510da1b62490c225ebf2e281c48&video=1&ref=P8gEMXATRUQUf6ECk4ueR4pHR6yxxTz7F8
Make a great day!
Randall Snyder
"Attract what you expect, reflect what you desire, become what you respect, mirror what you admire."
What you'll learn from this expert talk:
⚫ Significance of resonance: cell resonant vs. cell destructive
⚫ Role of consciousness in healing
⚫ Technological advances for achieving greater levels of consciousness
A careful study of history reveals the unreported steps in the march toward a tyrannical #technocratic state.
---
The transformation of the international system that took place between 1939 and 1945 has been well documented from a military-diplomatic perspective: the Second World War confirmed the status of the United States as a superpower, not only as a
result of the decisive economic and military contribution it made to the conflict, but also through the central role it played in the reorganisation of the post-war world, especially through the creation of a host of international organisations active in a
wide variety of fields. Until recently, however, historians have only been interested in the most visible part of this process, namely intergovernmental negotiations and the major conferences, most famously the San Francisco Conference. Precisely
what happened on an infra-governmental level remains little known, particularly when it comes to the question of how private American actors contributed to this process of reorganisation. One such case shall be examined here: the activities of the
Rockefeller Foundation (RF). Its wartime activities followed a pattern that has also been highlighted in recent historiography on the League of Nations (LoN), revealing a clear continuity between the pre-1939 and post-1945 international systems. This
case study allows us, moreover, to revise the commonly held view that the United States had been absent from the international system before 1939 and only entered the system after 1945, changing it radically. While the American government never had a clear political strategy with regard to the LoN, the large philanthropic foundations, principally the RF, gave constant support to the League. In particular, the RF engaged in a form of intellectual diplomacy during the interwar period, as evidenced in its cooperation with the technical sections of the LoN. Its aim was to create a global government of experts capable of solving the problems posed by the First World War and the crisis of 1929. While this diplomacy was presented as being wholly apolitical, it nevertheless had a clear objective that it held in common with American internationalist circles: to involve the United States in the LoN system to the maximum degree possible.1 Once the war had begun, the RF continued its activity along these lines and became involved de facto in matters relating to the changing structure of the LoN system and the development of the UN system. This article will argue that the RF played an important role in the wartime transition from one system to another through its collaboration with two principal international organisations. The first of these was the Economic, Financial and Transit Department (EFTD) of the LoN, which had been accumulating considerable expertise in economic affairs since the interwar period. By financing its move to the United States and all of its work during the Second World War, the RF would allow it to make a major intellectual contribution to the reorganisation of the global economic order after 1945. The second major contribution of the RF was its participation in the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA). This organisation was a crucial agent in the transition from the LoN system to the UN, of which it was the earliest organisation. The RF provided UNRRA not only with staff but also with a considerable number of working methods, particularly relating to questions of health, as well as with a network of contacts around the world. The Foundation thus found itself heavily involved in the process of transforming the LoN system to that of the UN. It was not merely a private organisation involved in this field; it was itself an actor in the redefinition of the overall structure of the system of international organisations during the Second World War. Its role in this process was threefold: it provided financial backing, carried forward the legacy of the LoN into the UN system and supplied expertise and a set of working practices on the ground that would serve as operating models for international organisations after 1945, notably for the World Health Organisation.
Curry has repeatedly been invited as a witness to United States Congressional hearings as one of the few scientists advancing doubts about the significance of human contributions to climate change, and political figures have used Curry's statements and writings in their arguments.
Between 2014 and February 2019, Curry testified before at least six Republican-led House committees, expressing the idea that the dangers of global warming are overstated and difficult to predict. These testimonies include criticisms of President Obama's climate plan, the UN climate action plan, and other policy proposals aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions. In her Natural Resources Committee testimony on February 6, 2019, Curry stated that, "Man-made climate change is not an existential threat in the 21st century.... The perception of a near-term apocalypse has narrowed the policy options".
When I first saw this when it was released in 2006 I was stunned at how much I wasn't aware of and couldn't stop talking about it to anyone who would listen. This documentary is a perfect introduction to the way the world works and covers much of the agenda we see being forced down our throats today. The interviews with former IRS agents makes as solid a case as can be made concerning the IRS and taxation.
---
Aaron Russo's documentary is titled "America: Freedom to Fascism," released in 2006. In this film, Russo addresses various topics he deems harmful to Americans, including the IRS, income tax, Federal Reserve System, national ID cards, human-implanted RFID tags, electronic voting machines, globalization, Big Brother, and government use of terrorism to limit citizens' rights. The documentary explores the connection between income tax collection and the erosion of civil liberties in the United States, questioning the legality of federal income tax. Aaron Russo, a filmmaker, libertarian activist, and 9/11 truther, produced this thought-provoking documentary late in his career.
#FreedomToFascism #AaronRusso #BigBrother #FederalReserve #IRS #RFID #Terrorism #ElectronicVotingMachines #Globalization #Documentary
Author: Brad_with_a_Q from San Francisco ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
27 June 2011
Yes, this film covers one side of the tort reform and mandatory arbitration argument. Yes the cases presented have been chosen to ignite a certain emotional response. But is this a bad thing? In a nation where it seems that the people have grown jaded to government actions, it takes a certain amount of emotional stirring to get them off their seat. This film does just that.
Hot Coffee shows us what damage can be done when we listen to PR or shoddy journalism without investigating their claims further. Before watching this film if asked about the leading story, enter McDonald's infamous coffee spill, I would have been right in line with those ready to condemn the clumsy patron. But after being presented with more of the facts from the case I am now appalled at how quickly I jumped on a bandwagon led by ignorance and corporate damage control. Susan Saladoff succeeds in bringing these issues down to a level we can all understand. From what started the drive for tort reform and how it can hurt the victims of these cases, to what measures have been taken by big business to protect their interests, each story presented guides us through the evolution of this process with poignant relevance.
In reference to a previous review I also wanted to clear up that in no way does this film try to pass the buck. No one, including the victims, denies there were things they could have done differently to help prevent these accidents from occurring. What is being found in each of these cases is a consistent amount of gross negligence on the part of the companies involved. None of these examples were the first of their type submitted to the businesses. So how do you get these types of corporations to changed flawed policy? You hit them where it hurts. This is why the jury, not the victim (in this case), sought such high dollar damages, to prevent this sort of accident from occurring again. If you missed that the first time, you might wanna give this documentary another go.
With that said, Hot Coffee is an effective and engaging documentary with a clear message. This viewer came away feeling more empowered, and will think twice next time he signs the dotted line.