Please subscribe to this channel, and subscribe to my newsletter at https://CaliforniaOpenCarry.com
Charles Nichols
Website - https://CaliforniaOpenCarry.com
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/CaliforniaRightToCarry/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/CRTC_Nichols
Please Donate:
GoFundMe - https://www.gofundme.com/help-charles-nichols-fight-for-2a
Baird v. Bonta handgun Open Carry Update 10-28-2023
Please subscribe to this channel, and subscribe to my newsletter at https://CaliforniaOpenCarry.com
California Open Carry Lawsuit is now in its Eleventh Year
YouTube deleted my channel. This is one of the videos that was deleted.
Please donate to Charles Nichols and his fight for Open Carry:
PayPal (Debit/Credit/E-Check) - http://tinyurl.com/PC12031Lawsuit
GoFundMe - https://www.gofundme.com/help-charles-nichols-fight-for-2a
Bitcoin: 1AdtAJfcdBkA777fwtVhmCwSwCKGTFrgGz
Amazon.com Wish List - https://a.co/eCfHOzB
B&H Photo Wish List - https://www.bnh.com/wish/2a15bc2972ae21a62644bdd63e958351/
Website - https://CaliforniaOpenCarry.com
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/CaliforniaRightToCarry/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/CRTC_Nichols
My California Open Carry lawsuit was originally filed under the name Charles Nichols v. Edmund G. Brown Jr., et al, but it has been in Federal court for so long, both Governor Brown and Attorney General Harris have left office and been replaced as defendants. The lawsuit is now stylized as Charles Nichols v. Gavin Newsom et al.
November 30, 2020, marked the beginning of the tenth year of my California Open Carry lawsuit, Charles Nichols v. Gavin Newsom et al.
Please subscribe to this video channel, and subscribe to my newsletter at https://CaliforniaOpenCarry.com
State v. Rosenthal, 75 Vt. 295, 55 A. 610 (1903)
QUESTION PRESENTED
Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), the federal statute that prohibits a person from possessing a firearm if he has been convicted of “a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year,” ibid., complies with the Second Amendment.
Please subscribe to this channel, and subscribe to my newsletter at https://CaliforniaOpenCarry.com
Charles Nichols
Website - https://CaliforniaOpenCarry.com
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/CaliforniaRightToCarry/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/CRTC_Nichols
Please Donate:
GoFundMe - https://www.gofundme.com/help-charles-nichols-fight-for-2a
Garland v. Range - The Next SCOTUS 2A Case
JUSTICE ALITO: Well, Heller -- and -- and I will stop after this -- Heller cited decisions going into the 19th Century as confirmation of what it had already concluded based on text and history at or before the time of the adoption of the Second Amendment and said this is what it was understood to mean at the time and it's further evidence that this is what this right was understood to mean because it kept being reaffirmed by decisions that came after. But I find it hard to understand how later decisions and statutes, particularly when you start to get into the late 19th Century and the early 20th Century, can be used as a substitute for evidence about what the right was understood to mean in 1791 or 1868 if you think that's the relevant date.
Justice Alito - Heller already decided what the Second Amendment means