Here and There -- The Question of [A]synchronous Work
Synopsis:
Product usability acts as a significant factor in whether an item gets purchased. In the world of software, usability and the user experience (UX) takes on a new level of complexity.
Sometimes, the features, look, and feel of a software system are the outcome of prioritization decisions by the organization that produces the system rather than from a focus on what will make the system easiest to use.
Software companies struggle to find a balance between consistency and modernism, and often it's the end-user that ends up losing in the balance. Is there a better way to satisfy all parties?
Synopsis:
Many science fiction settings include the idea of custom food on demand - the ability to instantly have any food or drink when you want it, how you want it, with no wait.
One such more realistically-scoped yet no less impressive accomplishment is Cana Technology's upcoming molecular beverage printer, which intends to provide custom-request beverages of all kinds at your fingertips.
Like most legitimately transformative goals, the novelty appeal is the lesser of its true offerings -- the real potential for Cana lies in how it can transform automation, independent subsistence, supply chain, and more -- essentially taking a small but substantial step towards a more dynamic, organic, maintainable, and cost-effective society.
Related Reading:
https://techcrunch.com/2022/01/21/cana-technology-raises-glass-to-new-capital-as-it-readies-beverage-printer-for-market/
https://thespoon.tech/cana-unveils-molecular-beverage-printer-a-netflix-for-drinks-that-can-make-nearly-any-type-of-beverage/
Synopsis:
In the modern world, physical commodities are a fundamental barrier of freedom, starkly differentiated from how we have learned to treat digital goods.
The reality of physical, three-dimensional objects is that they occupy space and require labor to move, to transform, and to use.
The modern supply chain endeavors to overcome this barrier and enable us to treat our physical goods with the same liquidity and ease with which we treat our digital goods. We have not yet achieved this state, and may not achieve it until we surpass the restrictions of effort and cost to a level on par with the simplicity of our digital commodities.
The route to this destination is fraught with uncertainty and dangers, but upon surmounting these issues will we have the potential to become free of the mental inhibitions of self-sustainment and move towards the greater pursuits of which humans are so inherently capable.
Related reading:
https://archive.org/stream/galaxymagazine-1954-04/Galaxy_1954_04#page/n7/mode/2up
https://reallifemag.com/free-shipping/
Synopsis:
Technology brings ease, and ease brings complacency. It's not altogether a bad thing, but when it comes to the world of information, it's a big deal -- complacency towards what we know stymies our communal efforts to improve. Most importantly: you can't think about what you don't know. Using technology to help us learn and help us think, rather than as substitutes for knowing and for thinking, will help us collaborate, innovate, and continue to improve.
Related Reading:
https://aeon.co/ideas/how-much-can-we-afford-to-forget-if-we-train-machines-to-remember
https://booktrib.com/2020/11/11/jack-j-hersch-the-dangers-of-automation-in-airliners/
https://www.ismp.org/resources/understanding-human-over-reliance-technology
Synopsis:
There's something unusual about the internet in that we treat it as very permanent when the content we access online is anything but permanent. How many sites and services do we sign up for and never visit again? How many of them even exist a few short years later?
Taking a contextual view of how the information in our virtual world plays its role gives perspective into what that data means, and helps us get a handle on the relative importance of the digital world we encounter daily.
Related Reading:
https://boingboing.net/2019/03/17/facebook-is-next.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_rot
https://visual.ly/community/infographic/social-media/how-long-do-social-media-posts-last
Synopsis:
Verifying information in the modern world presents a more complicated barrier than at times in the past. Specifically, reliance on authority -- in the sense of knowledge on a subject -- has become susceptible to natural degradation due to factors such as the profluence of information, availability of that same information, and the narrowness of many areas of knowledge.
There is a balance in how we come to rely on information, and the individuals who claim some form of authority over that information. We cannot ignore the validity of expertise, but neither can we assume the correctness of any one individual, no matter how knowledgeable. Striking a chord between the two extremes on this issue will be a necessary skill in the modern world of information.
Related reading:
https://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/goldman/seminarfall2007/october%2031st/goldman%20-%20experts%20which%20ones%20should%20you%20trust.pdf
http://www.paulgraham.com/ecw.html
Synopsis:
In the world of education, complaints often surface regarding the inefficacy of higher education in preparing students for the real word. Many students, the claim is made, are not taught well, with universities sometimes focusing more on staffing for research than for education.
To understand what's behind this failing requires a definition of the purpose of higher education, and the ways in which it differs from primary and secondary education not only in form, but in purpose.
It is necessary that any level of education provides certain expected skills to its students. What changes from level to level is the role that the student must play. Recognizing the differences and the reasons behind these differences provides the key for cogent discussions on how to handle higher education as our society progresses.
Related Reading:
https://www.chronicle.com/article/Teaching-Versus-Research/45969
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/oct/21/universities-research-teaching-minister
https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/roychan/files/chan_r._y._2016._understanding_the_purpose_aim_function_of_higher_education._jeppa_65_1-40.pdf
Synopsis:
The technologies of money, both on the side exposed to the consumer and the side handled by financiers, contain great potential, but also great risk. The more significant examples in recent memory, like Bitcoin, consumer data tracking, PayPal, etc, have not been without their challenges -- and often remain in flux to this day.
With such implications, it's impossible to tell whether the result of a particular technology will be positive or negative. It may be that we simply must decide whether to take the risk for any given technology, and find out whether it was worthwhile only in hindsight.
Related Reading:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/next-in-googles-quest-for-consumer-dominancebanking-11573644601?mod=rsswn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libra_(digital_currency)
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fintech.asp
Synopsis:
While all technologies in some way change how we live, much of this change is slow and relies on culture to change along with it, over time. But some technology cuts right towards the core of how we interact with the world around us, and perceive the objects in our daily lives.Distributed manufacturing is one of these key technologies. While this promising field currently remains in its infancy, the potential it offers is bountiful: more efficient creation of goods, adaptability to changing circumstances, and a shift towards viewing goods as ever-present, rather than as a need to be fulfilled -- among other benefits. Such a future may yet be in the distance, but the innovations in this field today lead towards a more bountiful future for all.
Related Reading:
https://www.fastcompany.com/90597168/unilevers-new-nano-factories-fit-in-a-shipping-container-so-they-can-go-anywhere-in-the-world
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_manufacturing
Synopsis:
As fabrication of the visual reality around us becomes easier, and the technological arms-race reaches ever more advanced heights, where does the responsibility lie for establishing truth?
Some claim that the burden is on the content creators -- but this is difficult to enforce. Some claim that is it on the content distributors -- but this is difficult to implement and maintain as technology moves forward. Some claim that it is on the individual who consumes the media -- but this requires patience and understanding on the part of every individual in a society in order to succeed.
Perhaps a combination of approaches is possible. In any case, this fascinating technological aspect must not simply be shuttered, a response which is practically implausible, and which may have extreme negative ramifications if ignored. But if a quality cultural discussion can be started and maintained, then we may stand a chance of staying ahead of the curve, and putting such technology to use for good, rather than ill.
Related reading:
https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/12/how-i-created-a-deepfake-of-mark-zuckerberg-and-star-treks-data/
https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/7/20953040/openai-text-generation-ai-gpt-2-full-model-release-1-5b-parameters
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/by14rl/deepfakebusting_apps_can_spot_even_a_single_pixel/