Subject Zero Patreon https://www.patreon.com/subjectzerolaboratories Breakthrough Solid State Battery - 900 Wh/L Samsung [2020] Samsung research was led by Yong-Gun Lee for an All-Solid-State-Battery (ASSBs). Their goal was to eliminate dendrites formation and increase coulombic efficiency. To do that they sandwiched layers of Lithium Nickel-Cobalt-Manganese-Oxide (NMC for short) mixed with a Sulfide Solid Electrolytes (SSE, show formula on screen), on top of nanocomposite-layer of Silver-Carbon. All of this is located in between a foil of Aluminum and Stainless steel as the current collectors. The idea behind this was to remove lithium foil from the mix and have all lithium atoms part of the NMC and SSE. This approach diminishes the costs of the overall battery manufacturing since handling lithium usually needs an oxygen free environment due to its high reactivity. This is important for a few reasons, in conventional lithium batteries, the anode comprised of lithium moves freely towards the positive electrode during discharge. Dendrites are formed during the charging process when lithium moves back to its initial location thanks to the free movement enabled by liquid or gel electrolyte. This is the main limiting factor of how much energy can be store in these batteries since to control this, the amount of lithium available in the system has to be caped, limiting the energy density. Sources Nature Article https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-020-0575-z.epdf Energy Density https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density Gaston Planté https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaston_Planté History of batteries https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_battery Lithium-ion battery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-ion_battery Cost of production of lithium ion batteries https://qnovo.com/82-the-cost-components-of-a-battery/ ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAFk-CebHWA

SpaceX Vs NASA - Does SpaceX Really Makes a Difference? and what is the difference? SpaceX sure does make a lot of promises but just how much are we saving by using their rockets. Find out here. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lQ_tC-u8ko

NEW Graphene Discovery May Unlock Superconductivity secrets | Here's how [Update 2019] Graphene has baffled scientist for over a decade now, but recently they discovered something peculiar yet again. In this video we will recap all of the peculiar superconductivity aspects of graphene and the magic angle which was recently discovered and tested. It is possible that this will be used with electronic components and most important of all batteries to fuel the electric revolution. References and further reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_superconductors https://phys.org/news/2018-03-rotated-magic-angle-graphene-sheets.html https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07848-2 https://www.quantamagazine.org/whats-the-magic-behind-graphenes-magic-angle-20190528/ https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsnano.5b07848 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_applications_of_superconductivity http://news.mit.edu/2018/graphene-insulator-superconductor-0305 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mott_insulator https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsnano.5b07848 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_superconductors https://www.nature.com/articles/nature26160 NOTE: The animations in my videos take a substantial amount of time to make, so please be patient. I am trying to get a video per week, but some times it takes longer. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyYoE0RloXA

Graphene Processors and Quantum Gates Since the 1960s, Moore’s law has accurately predicted the evolution trend of processors as to the amount of transistor doubling every 2 years. But lately we’ve seen something odd happening, processor clocks aren’t getting any faster. This has to do with another law called Dennard Scaling and it seems that the good old days with silicon chips are over. Hello everyone, subject zero here! Thankfully the solution might have been available for quite some time now and Graphene offers something quite unique to this problem, not only for your everyday processor types, but also Quantum computing. In 2009 it was speculated that by now we would have the famous 400GHz processors, but this technology has proven itself to be a bit more complicated than previously thought however most scientists including me, believe that in the next 5 years we will see the first Graphene commercial hardware come to reality. References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Zeno_effect https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-019-0150-2#Sec2 https://www.hpcwire.com/2019/05/08/graphene-surprises-again-this-time-for-quantum-computing/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene_plasmonics https://www.computerhope.com/history/processor.htm http://www.tfcbooks.com/teslafaq/q&a_024.htm https://www.rambus.com/blogs/understanding-dennard-scaling-2/ https://www.technologyreview.com/s/518426/how-to-save-the-troubled-graphene-transistor/ https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1308/1308.2931.pdf https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160518120130.htm https://www.nature.com/articles/srep24654.pdf http://infowebbie.com/scienceupdate/spinning-around-room-temperature-field-effect-transistor-using-graphenes-electron-spin/ https://graphene-flagship.eu/field-effect-transistor-using-graphenes-electron-spin https://github.com/karlrupp/microprocessor-trend-data/tree/master/42yrs https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/1.4905269 https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-magazine/quantum-computing-technology-explained/article36397793/ ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLPpDoMBVK0