Is capitalism natural? The answer to this question pertains to the question relating to human nature, in short, yes, capitalism is natural. @Viki 1999 makes the huge assumption that because human life existed for thousands of years before the industrial revolution and was often tribalistic and because collectivism dominated the planet for millennia's, this somehow means that this is how nature is supposed to be regarding human beings. She also makes the bold assumption that capitalism began in the 1770s, which is ignoring the fact capitalism derives from its origins of meritocracy, dating back to the first days of barter. The argument of individualism and collectivism dates back to the days of Aristotle and Plato. What we saw for centuries was endless wars throughout most of human history, as well as the starvation and extreme poverty thanks to the collectivism that dominated the planet. Much like how people today view pirates from a romanticised version they see in Disney films, they don't realise that the real world prior to the industrial revolution was horrible. Whilst these same people are very quick to speak down about the awful living conditions and how poor people were living during the industrial revolution, this is one of the biggest contradictions they could make given the fact the living conditions during the 19th century were "better off" than where people came from living in before that period of history. It's all well staring at a still picture or even a drawing depicting the life of people through the scope of our living conditions today and romanticising people working collectively, but the harsh reality says otherwise when you learn about the periodical famines the entire world faced for centuries, as well as the common malnutrition diseases, the short life expectancy and harsh living conditions they lived. Even if we look at Viki's argument, living conditions aside, it's an erroneous argument to claim that human nature is naturally collectivist, the evidence of the centuries of war where thousands lost their lives proves otherwise. Before individualism came to rise by the late 18th century, how people largely obtained wealth prior to that period was through exactly what the Vikings did, by plunder as much blood was spilled. It wasn't until the idea of free trade set the stage that we would eventually see a better and moralistic system replace that and that was the development of capitalism overtaking from where we came from of the old world. Also, individualism is something grossly misunderstood, Viki fails to comprehend that individualism doesn't mean every man for himself, nor does it mean people can't work collectively, it simply means that the individual is the chooser of his or her own destiny, of his or her own econo ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2ulIYUhLA

The question surrounding can our planet survive capitalism is rather ludicrous for a variety of reasons. As I argue in this video on part 1 of climate change and capitalism I touch upon a variety of the climate change myths with regards to the our planet temperatures in correlation to CO2 level data. Socialists like to believe (or other climate alarmists,) that CO2 drives temperature as they like to use data from the past 800,000 years. Another one of their favourite arguments is to touch upon the arctic ice melting, however, strangely enough, much like Francesca Fiorentini she completely ignores the Antarctic as ice sheets have been growing more more than 10,000 years. There is plentiful data out there to back this. Another erroneous myth is that sea levels are rising leading to such a dooms day scenario, for this argument check out Tony Heller's informative video titled 'Accelerating Rate Of Sea Level Fraud' explaining in detail that debunks this claim and be sure to subscribe to his channel that has a wealth of information out there refuting their arguments on climate change, etc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e82smfcypUc&t=165s I'm sure there is much more data out there than I could possibly imagine, some of which could detail more information regarding the CO2 spike in data over the past century. When it comes to the argument on climate change and capitalism just like Francesca Fiorentini tries to argue, you can hear from the basis of her argument she doesn't even understand prices, she thinks Donald Trump just sets any old price he likes but doesn't comprehend the laws of supply and demand that determine cost, no different to her sarcasm on the $700,000 price tag on medication. As I have argued in detail before, the reason American healthcare costs are through the roof is to blame on government intervention, I explained that in detail in my response to VOX which you can also find here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsHx8Opx8ss ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU8dXWjjykM