CMIcreationstation Published on Dec 21, 2016 Does faith mean "believing in something even though it is not supported by evidence?" Yes, and no, depending on who you ask. Watch the full episode at: http://www.creation.com/cml5-23 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ0HxoFRVic

CMIcreationstation Published on Dec 2, 2015 Did you know that the earth’s magnetic field has reversed direction—or ‘flipped’—multiple times in the past? The evidence for these reversals is rock solid, because when molten rock cools, certain mineral grains align with the earth’s magnetic field, thus recording the direction of Earth’s magnetic field at the time, in the solidified rock. Previously, most geologists thought that a single reversal would take many thousands of years. However, creationist physicist, Dr Russell Humphreys, reasoned they must have happened quickly to fit within the biblical timescale. So Dr Humphreys made a prediction that quickly-cooling thin lava flows would be found that recorded fast changes in the direction of the magnetic field. This prediction was later proven correct. Scientists were shocked to find major magnetic field changes had occurred within weeks in a single lava flow. They published this in the regular scientific literature. Thus yet another scientific prediction, based on biblical history, proved to be correct. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com Reference: ‘Fossil’ magnetism reveals rapid reversals of the earth’s magnetic field http://creation.com/fossil-magnetism-... The earth’s magnetic field: evidence that the earth is young http://creation.com/the-earths-magnet... Mercury’s Magnetic Field is Young! http://creation.com/mercurys-magnetic... Related Products: Dismantling the Big Bang: God's Universe Rediscovered http://creation.com/s/10-2-188 Creation Answers Book http://creation.com/s/10-2-505 Creation Magazine Subscription http://creation.com/mag ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX0E-t2HR5g

CMIcreationstation Published on Nov 20, 2012 One of the basic tenets of science is that open-mindedness is critically important, and the evidence should be followed wherever it may lead. But some scientists say that we should not always be so open-minded, and that some conclusions should not be allowed, even if demanded by all the evidence. They say that no matter how much evidence there is for ingenious design in life, in the structure of the universe, or in libraries full of encoded information in genomes, they must not even consider the possibility that God might have had anything to do with the creation of such wonders. One scientist said; "Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic." But this simply reveals a philosophical bias against God. Many highly qualified scientists believe the Bible's account of creation provides a much better explanation for the existence and operation of the universe. Related Articles: Naturalism vs Reality (http://creation.com/naturalism-vs-rea...) Philosophical Naturalism and the age of the Earth are they related (http://creation.com/philosophical-nat...) Who's really pushing bad science (http://creation.com/whos-really-pushi...) Related Products: The Fossil Record Unearthing Nature's history of life Book (http://creation.com/store_redirect.ph...) Reason in the balance book (http://creation.com/store_redirect.ph...) ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkxoqFoCpnw

CMIcreationstation Published on Oct 13, 2011 For details visit: http://creation.com/creation-magazine... This episode is based on CMI's booklet 15 Reasons to Take Genesis as History. It is a summary of some of the major arguments that the Genesis record must be taken as real historical events involving real people. Allegorical or mythological renderings result in massive theological difficulties. Related articles - The authority of Scripture (http://creation.com/the-authority-of-...) - Jesus Christ on the infallibility of Scripture (http://creation.com/jesus-christ-on-t...) - Should Genesis be taken literally? (http://creation.com/should-genesis-be...) - Are (biblical) creationists 'cornered'?—a response to Dr J.P. Moreland (http://creation.com/are-biblical-crea...) - But from the beginning of ... the institution of marriage? (http://creation.com/but-from-the-begi...) - Hebrew scholar affirms that Genesis means what it says! (http://creation.com/hebrew-scholar-af...) - Did Moses really write Genesis? (http://creation.com/did-moses-really-...) - Does Genesis hold up under critic's scrutiny? (http://creation.com/does-genesis-hold...) - Genesis: Bible authors believed it to be history (http://creation.com/genesis-bible-aut...) - The Fall: a cosmic catastrophe (http://creation.com/the-fall-a-cosmic...) - Genesis means what it says: Basil (AD 329--379) (http://creation.com/genesis-means-wha...) - Orthodoxy and Genesis: What the fathers really taught (http://creation.com/orthodoxy-and-gen...) - Luther on evolution (http://creation.com/luther-on-evolution) - The slippery slide to unbelief (http://creation.com/the-slippery-slid...) - But it's divisive! (http://creation.com/but-its-divisive) - Refuting Compromise-introduction (http://creation.com/refuting-compromi...) Feedback - Former long-ager finds freedom in a literal Genesis (http://creation.com/former-long-ager-...) - Theistic evolutionist answers CMI s questions (http://creation.com/theistic-evolutio...) Also see - Genesis Q&A page (http://creation.com/genesis-questions...) - Creation Compromises Q&A page (http://creation.com/creation-compromises) - Bible Q&A page (http://creation.com/bible-questions-a...) ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XPPbOS5gCg