Translation: It depends on what the definition of 'is', is. Doesn't it Jordan? Peterson is a Judaizer, whether he understands that or not. He has gone down the Talmudic/sophists road. Judaizing requires the DESTRUCTION of every kind of identity that is not the preservation of Jews. If you do not demand the destruction of all loyalties except loyalty to Jews, 'God's Chosen People', you are committing blasphemy in the eyes of Jewish Law AND gentile judaizers alike. We must stop people who are judaizing us in our own nations. Most of them today are NOT Jews. And see them to a place where they can ONLY spread that hostility to each other. The Judaizers are on the left and the right. It is not all about JEWS. That is something neither Jews nor anti-semites can bear. Both the rabbis who are obsessed with Jews and the anti-rabbis whose whole life is also Jews. I couldn’t care less whether Jews are a tribe or a race or Purple People Eaters. My only interest in them is that their whole purpose, their whole being, is to be our enemies. ------------ Bob Whitaker - on Judaism and Judaizers: "Because I am an “anti-semite,” I am a Zionist. That is, I believe that there should be a homeland where ALL Jews not only MAY go, but MUST go. In that land, they would be more than welcome to make EACH OTHER more Jewish. They SHOULD Judaize each other there. It’s called naturalization. But what they do in their own Zion is not my prtoblem. When ANYBODY judaizes US, that is our problem, regardless of who is doing it, Jonathan Greenblatt or Jordan Peteson. When Jews judaism each other, they are teaching the basic premise of Judaism. The basic premise of Judaism is that the Jews are God’s Chosen People. God is only concerned about Jews: “Thou shalt have no other god before me.” This means that the only people God allows to have a loyalty to their own is the Chosen People, the Jews. So if any of US are loyal to our own people, we are defying God. Jews should be loyal only to Jews AND non-Jews shold only be loyal to Jews. That is why Emma Lazarus and Alan Dershowitz and Abe Foxman (head of the ADL) always took it for granted that White gentiles needed to be done away with in a melting pot while Jews must be preserved. Our destruction is a natural consequence, a fundamental DEMAND, of the Jewish outlook on life. And that is precisely what the likes of Jordan Peterson, who is NOT a Jew, preaches. The Chosen People of God are, by definition, AT LEAST the Master Race. Even a committed pro-White like me would hesitate to say that Whites are the ONLY group that has the right to exist. My own people are the only ones """I””” asm interested in preserving. But it is no part of my program to DESTROY other people’s identity. In fact, I respect those like Stokeley Carmichel who fight for their own precisely because I DO want to preserve my own. Judaizing is precisely the opposite. Judaizing requires the DESTRUCTION of every kind of identity that is not the preservation of Jews. If you do not demand the destruction of all loyalties exept a loyalty to Jews, God’s Chosen People, you are committing blasphemy in the eyes of Jewish Law AND gentile judaizers like Pat Robertson. Our destruction is the first law of Judaism. If my race is to survive, we must stop people who are judaizing us. Most of them today are NOT Jews. There should be a place for Jews. It should be a place where they will stop infecting US and can only spread their disease to each other." Groups that try to revive Old Testament religion and combine it with Christianity are rightly called “cults,” and they are typically controlling and psychologically harmful. Think about the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Think about St. Paul’s virulent attacks against the “Judaizers.” Even Biblical literalists are not literal with the Old Testament. For example, in the numerous passages stating that the enemies of the Israelites must be killed to a man, they say that the enemy must have committed some grave sin. But that is not what the passage says. That is a rationalization which becomes difficult when the Israelites are ordered to slay even the women and children, and sometimes the animals. The same standard of literalism that can be applied to the New Testament is not applied to the Old. --------------------------- Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

"The spike protein is a toxin. We know that the spike protein can induce cancer pathways. It inhibits your DNA's ability to repair itself. Your own immune system attacks your own cells. We're seeing it in the lab and clinically. This is a crime against humanity. We are using a dangerous product on humanity, that is harming the human cells, that is harming the human body, that is harming our hormones, that is harming our reproductive organs, that is harming any organ where that protein lands. Period." Dr. Ryan Cole ------------------------------------------------- Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational purposes.