In the asking what can stop this dogmatic individualistic relativism, I say :
-The asking is relative to a description of what is sensed as occurring already; especially in light of a world in greater and greater (communion) communication moving towards a monism of behavior, law, finance, language, etc.
-That one who questions this does not investigate nor present a "root" of the problem specifically or is not committed to expand 'their' view in such a way as to describe an answer.
+And is there a genuine concern about the whole of humanity? Certainly it is found within those who speak of it, focus their concerns outwardly to 'people at large'
This is just cool smooth jazz concerning ways to describe good conversations .. this convo is smooth, cool & jazzy and gets the listener exactly where they'd like to be.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQb3ksSKW2A
A layman's video for those who want to speak 'of finding' ontological space-paradigmatic Points
What does it mean to wax sophistically via a well steeped house, in a meandering, well accepted collaborations of historically 'great' works, as opposed to growing from the streets and intersecting non-great books that are not of the collection of the house?
What would it mean to deconstruct one's securities into the nausea of buzzing backgrounds?
What would living centrally within an always buzzing mix foreground do to one's temporal sensations of object foreground environment background? Could a spirit just orchestrate words in a non-pre-scripted fashion from the infinitude of buzz? does the logos as paradigm need to always be present in order to speak, paint, do. Perhaps the drive of the philosopher is only ever found within approach and self appreciation. But never content with arriving the 'I' as the background Buzz nor dissenting oneself to the clarity of mythologic madness's shadow. aka a zombie rehumanizing itself with only ever full engagement to the presence of their being. Could such a person exist. Could Neo find himself here as jedi engagement. Or is all fantasy characterized.
ANy criticism found within the video is rooted in an otherly source meaning me, as i find myself locked within the epistemic system maintained for the sake of Differance, Collapsed about faith in future obsolescence
A theory of geometric declarations producing mythic characterizations, sprouted from the ego's maintaining itself via adherences to defenses, in the face of an idea of intellectual encroachment.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhiD2J_SXaw
my political approach towards politics. Money, ethics and the system at large:
https://www.facebook.com/campaigntoelectmikefahl
If you want to help me financially than paypal mikefahl@gmail.com
Thanks.
And btw, I figure that my blunt title might garner more attention. It's really about bombastics, and my self allowance to use such words is for attractive effects only. I abhor such implied belittlements in general discourse actually, In terms of being descriptive of any entity person or group.
Thanks for free-speech
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LkzIBOJMEk
wat if war were a woman? a word, a cry a bellow.
Re-recordings from the day of translation of the plate which define the Book of dos pook.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUDT_wR2vfw
"No bones in space" by Violet Maura read by dospook
You can see her page on stickam at
http://www.stickam.com/tayyy420
She has very fresh words
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBmhX_AxcAE
Thoughts on Antons & wisemonkeys ideas on life as gift narrative and mythic imbuing into modern non-dogmatic ways of thinking (but why not just add all the dogmatic transcendental entities) as it flows into the idea of robust narrative.
The opposition of a robust narrative as sinewy line which "becomes" a geometric line which seems to orient itself into symbolism, which seems to resonate with (shared) phenomenological "purpose", a sacred symbolism. (if you will (or if you won't (whatever))).
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZSk7os5pAU