A TIMELINE OF 2020. This is an updated version of a previous video I made. It now includes two studies that I felt needed to be in the timeline. There are also some excerpts from W.H.0 reports on mask wearing from March, April, June and Dec, as well as some other video footage that wasn’t in the first video. As new face mask mandates have just been put in place in New Zealand, both this video and my other recent video: ‘Challenging Epidemiologist Prof Michael Baker on Face Masks & Mass Masking’, need to be watched and shared by as many people as possible. These two videos together should leave people in no doubt that mandating the wearing of face masks for healthy people in the community is not only ineffective, but also harmful. Here's my other video: ‘Challenging Epidemiologist Prof Michael Baker on Face Masks & Mass Masking’ https://www.bitchute.com/video/mCb0bcFbwGVh/ About this video . . . In the first four months of 2020, we were repeatedly told that cloth/surgical masks are not only ineffective at stopping viral transmission, but that wearing such masks could actually increase a person’s chances of infection. On 17 May 2020, a WHO-commissioned study, published by the CDC, found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article This study was a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, which are accepted as the gold standard of scientific evidence. On 1 June 2020, another WHO-commissioned study, published in The Lancet, claimed a risk reduction of 80% with the use of face masks: https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2820%2931142-9 It was this study that was instrumental in the shift of global face mask policies. However, this study only looked at observational studies, it didn’t look at any randomised controlled trials. Compared to randomised controlled trials, observational studies are considered to be a lower standard of evidence in the traditional hierarchy of scientific evidence. And this Lancet study received criticism (see link below) https://swprs.org/who-mask-study-seriously-flawed/ On 6 June, citing “evolving evidence” the Director General of the World Health Organisation announced a change in WHO policy on the wearing face masks by the general public: “WHO advises that governments should encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult, such as on public transport, in shops or in other crowded or confined environments.” Prior to this announcement, the WHO had advised that only people with symptoms should wear masks, and they clearly said that people without symptoms shouldn’t wear them. It should also be noted that in the W.H.O’s 5 June Interim Guidance Report on mask use in the context of COVID-19 (5 June being just one day before their policy change announcement on 6 June), it is stated: “Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence” And while the W.H.O advised that the general public should be “encouraged” to wear masks, governments and police went further than mere encouragement. Masks were mandated in some places, even for people outside (the data shows that outdoor transmission is rare) and fines were issued for not wearing masks. On July 11, BBC Health Correspondent Deborah Cohen reported: “The debate is deeply political. Newsnight understands that the World Health Organisation committee that reviewed the evidence for the use of face coverings in public didn’t back them, but after political lobbying, the W.H.O now recommends them” Following this change in policy by the W.H.O, for the remainder of 2020, we were told that we should wear face masks, even by those who initially told us that masks are ineffective. Yet, in the W.H.O’s Dec Interim Guidance Report on mask use in the context of COVID-19, we find the following: “At present there is only limited and inconsistent scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. A large randomised community-based trial in which 4862 healthy participants were divided into a group wearing medical/surgical masks and a control group found no difference in infection with SARS-CoV2” The ‘randomised community-based trial ‘ mentioned above is the landmark Danish mask study published in November 2020: https://bit.ly/2VVUgyv Copied From: Coronavirus Plushie, https://www.bitchute.com/video/ojGNGHFc0CAt/

Join our leading researchers on https://GroupDiscover.com to find the best videos from across the censorship-resistant internet platforms like Odysee, LBRY, Bitchute & Brighteon Add me on these great platforms: https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/ https://bitchute.com/timtruth/ https://GroupDiscover.com and https://flote.app/timtruth1 Brought to you by the great supporters of this channel who fund this research. Join us on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/timtruth for exclusive content, censored videos and to help me make this channel even better.

Donate: https://www.projectveritas.com/donate Get emails: https://confirmsubscription.com/h/j/EC8A17570A033FCC Follow: Telegram: https://t.me/project_veritas FB: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritas IG: https://www.instagram.com/project_veritas/ Telegram: https://t.me/JamesOKeefeIII IG: https://www.instagram.com/jamesokeefeiii/ Mission Statement Investigate & expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical & transparent society. Core Values MORAL COURAGE - Courage is the virtue that sustains all others. We choose to overcome our fears. WE ARE ALL LEADERS - Turning people into leaders. Completed staff work. Ownership. COLLABORATION - Best not to work in silos. No one individual is as smart as all of us. RESILIENCE - Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. Never, ever, ever give up. We don't let mistakes or setbacks discourage us. Pursue perfection, knowing full well you will never attain it. MISSION DRIVEN - The best people are motivated by purpose. We are passionate and truly believe in our cause. We must be externally focused, not internally focused. MAKE THE STATUS QUO DO THE IMPOSSIBLE - We move mountains. Failure is not an option. We do whatever it takes. THE TIP OF THE SPEAR - We are a loss leader. We do not shy away from conflict or litigation. Ethical Values Rule #1 – Truth is paramount. Our reporting is fact based with clear and irrefutable video and audio content. Truth is paramount. We never deceive our audience. We do not distort the facts or the context. We do not “selectively edit.” Rule #2 – We do not break the law. We maintain one-party consent when recording someone is inherently moral and ethical. We never record when there is zero-party consent. In areas where we are required to have consent from all parties, we seek legal guidance regarding the expectation of privacy’s impact on our right to record. Rule #3 – We adhere to the 1st Amendment rights of others. During our investigations we do not disrupt the peace. We do not infringe on the 1st Amendment rights of others. Rule #4 – The Zekman Test. The undercover investigations we pursue are judged by us to be of “vital public interest” and “profound importance.” The Zekman Test is our baseline. Undercover investigative reporting is necessary because, “...there’s no other way to get the story...” Whereas the Society of Professional Journalists allows for undercover techniques, if undercover techniques are necessary to expose issues of vital public importance; we believe they are not only allowed but required. Rule #5 – We Protect the Innocent When Possible - Embarrassing private details are not to be investigated. We sta ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAZv5wgC6_o Copied From: Project Veritas, https://odysee.com/@ProjectVeritas:7/exposehasbro-critical-race-theory:e

Copied From: https://odysee.com/@ProjectVeritas:7/pfizer-scientists-%E2%80%98your-covid:6