Published By
Created On
21 Nov 2023 00:11:04 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
More from the publisher
spso1e011
I am very proud of the opening monologue I have prepared for this evening, it is very moving. I also have a couple of really great reads from other outlets which I'll share with you.
Here's a teaser from the open, and I'll plan on seeing you tonight at 9:30pm on Odysee, Rumble, or our other platforms.
Today being Memorial Day, it might be fitting to speak a bit about military service.
Of course, the martial character of human conflict emerges elsewhere besides the military, and perhaps it would be still more fitting to speak in such a broader generality. There exists no shortage of bold men who will not be hailed as heroes, despite courageous sacrifice, be their names known or not. Some, the news records as villains, and our task is in some measure to see history do them greater justice.
The United States is not the only country with a monument known as the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. No culture survives without reverence for its warriors. Some do a better job than others of recovering their dead, but whatever their military prowess, combat is unpredictable, and people go missing.
It is both fitting and important then, that there be some shrine to their sacrifice. In the United States, ours is at Arlington National Cemetery. It is guarded, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, by soldiers from the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment, known as “The Old Guard.”
They perform a visually impressive routine when changing guard, and Sentinels, as they are known, have a creed which reads;
“My dedication to this sacred duty is total and whole-hearted. In the responsibility bestowed on me never will I falter. And with dignity and perseverance my standard will remain perfection. Through the years of diligence and praise and the discomfort of the elements, I will walk my tour in humble reverence to the best of my ability. It is he who commands the respect I protect, his bravery that made us so proud. Surrounded by well meaning crowds by day, alone in the thoughtful peace of night, this soldier will in honored glory rest under my eternal vigilance.”
While there are over 4,000 unknown soldiers buried at Arlington, the monument contains the remains of but three. One from World War I, another from the second World War, and one from the Korean war. An empty third crypt represents missing service members from Vietnam.
When power changes hands, perhaps it would be best to leave the Arlington Memorial to those who died in uniform overseas, but it might also be fitting to establish a new one for those who died, or otherwise had their lives destroyed, right here. The menace we face has surely left more than 4,000 corpses in its wake almost entirely unremarked upon. Many millions more yet walk, but are no less dead, disappeared, and forgotten.
I don't want to give the rest away, so please tune in for the live show at 9:30pm Eastern. If you can't catch the live broadcast, be sure to catch the podcast.
Other ways to listen https://SurrealPolitiks.com/start
Become a member https://SurrealPolitiks.com/join
GiveSendGo https://GiveSendGo.com/spm
Newsletter https://SurrealPolitiks.com/newsletter
Twitter https://Twitter.com/TalkRadioGod
Telegream https://t.me/surrealpolitiks
Transaction
Created
2 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
spmc20230628
There’s plenty in the news today, and I am inclined to recycle some social media and blog posts I’ve made in the last couple of days.
For example, this email to my PO, and this detailed demonstration that Google and Microsoft are abusing their spam filters for political purposes.
There are also some pretty troubling stories coming out of Ukraine, like Zelensky calling off elections, and a growing problem of harvesting organs from children.
What is perhaps most striking about the Ukrainian election issue, is how little attention has been called to it. I just looked for a text source on the story after hearing about it on Tucker Carlson’s Twitter show, and a search of Google News shows no results save for references to Tucker Carlson’s observation. Apparently it is now uncontroversial to call off elections.
My attention at the moment is focused closer to home, however. I am subscribed to a website called LowEndBox which helps keeps me apprised of the latest developments in the world of web hosting. You’ll be unsurprised to know that I am particularly interested in stories of deplatforming and the means by which the resilient overcome such challenges, and they have been very useful for this purpose.
I recently got an email from them about KiwiFarms, an online forum which has drawn some criticism for being host to “hate speech” and what is alleged to be targeted harassment. I have some history with KiwiFarms, and there is no love between us. I understand that I was made to be one of their “Lolcows” – a term they use to describe the targets of their ridicule – as I was dealing with the aftermath of my trip to Virginia in August of 2017.
There exist few services in the world that can protect a website from what are known as DDOS, or Distributed Denial of Service, attacks online. DDOS attacks use networks of hacked computers to flood a server with bogus requests until that server can no longer service regular users. They are criminal acts punishable by time in prison. While I was without Internet access, one of my neighbors was doing time for precisely this.
DDOS protection services obscure the actual address of the server being targeted, and filter traffic to that server to prevent the server from becoming overwhelmed. The most well known of these services is called CloudFlare. I use this service, and my sites would quickly cease to exist absent their protection. I have been targeted for DDOS attacks for as long as I have had my own websites, and it wasn’t long before I discovered the need for such a service.
Owing to pressure campaigns stemming from their content, KiwiFarms has been kicked off of CloudFlare and its small number of competitors. For the last two months, the site has only been able to exist on the so called “dark web” as a Tor hidden service, operating much like criminal drug markets such as the famous and long deceased “Silk Road”.
Back in 2018, I published a blog post titled “Goodbye Normie Web”, predicting that a time would arrive when the entire Internet simply operated in this way. That prediction has yet to be proven true, and there exists ample cause to doubt its inevitability. But the entire Internet need not go dark to give lend credence to the substance of what I was then saying.
All that has to happen is, a sufficient number of services are relegated to this means of communicating, that use of the service becomes a routine part of some percentage of Internet users daily lives, and it becomes integrated with normal Internet usage. Once that happens, being relegated to the dark web ceases to be a meaningful form of deplatforming. At a certain point, that seems inevitable, and the results of this will be a mixed bag.
On the one hand, dissident views become more difficult to censor, and this will be good news for people with dissident views. On the other, I predict, it will have the effect of further polluting the information environment.
I’ll gloss over for now the part of combating censorship, since that is hardly a new subject to anyone listening to me.
Polluting the information environment, is more interesting, in my view. News agencies and other sources of information have so discredited themselves in recent years that I have remarked about the downsides of this. Specifically, that it is becoming nearly impossible to form any consensus as to facts. Without such a consensus, it is impossible to debate the merits of inferences and interpretations, which have historically been the subject of good faith political discourse.
If the sources deemed most credible are relegated to anonymity, and therefore beyond the reach of legal action, discernment becomes much more difficult for information consumers. But if the legal system is abused, and law abiding people are deprived protection of the laws, then such credible sources have little choice but to be so relegated. They won’t be deplatformed ultimately, because they’ll be available and easy enough to find in the near future, but
Transaction
Created
2 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
spmc20240214
Congrats to those of you who have better things to do this evening. I'll be live and recording, and I hope you'll check us out in your free time.
The thought that currently sticks out in my mind is "Stop knocking love".
You hear such sentiments echoed from time to time and this is not unique to any particular element of society.
The Left wrecks the concept of love by dressing up all of their malice and nefarious behavior in colorful and unthreatening imagery and language, but with notable exceptions they do not deny its existence.
On the Right, and what might fairly be described as the "Far Right" in particular, undermining the existence or utility of love, seems to me, a decidedly more pronounced phenomenon.
Though examples abound, an archetypal sort is linked at Revolver News today. This is a Tweet thread by @cirnosad, purporting to tell us the 2,000 year history of Valentine's day. The thrust of the bit is that our notions of "romantic love" were imposed on us as a swindle by lesser beings, who sought to elevate their station in the world by manipulating the emotions of women. As you might guess, the implication is that courtships among individuals pursued for their own happiness, are an inferior way to organize family life, in comparison arranged marriages less interested in the happiness of those so bound.
The merits of the argument are by no means lost on me. Individuals pursuing their emotional highs and running from their emotional lows are certain to make decisions that impose expenses on civilization as a whole.
Boy meets girl. Boy wants to stick himself in girl. Boy loses control of himself and does whatever the appendage to be inserted commands.
Girl meets boy, girl meets another boy, girl meets Planned Parenthood. Girl meets University Professor. Girl meets another boy. Girl meets gender studies degree. Girl meets another boy, and another, and another, and another. Girl meets career. Girl meets another boy, and another, and another, and another. Girl votes Democrat. Girl meets menopause.
Such behavior cannot be sustained nor universalized, and so criticism is doubtlessly warranted.
But I'll tell ya something boy... I been in love. And in terms of things that you can measure in dollars, seconds, tears, whatever the case may be, love has done wrong by your humble correspondent. Hard to say in measurable terms what I have gained from it. Toss that whole thing out the window, deliver my servant and, happiness be damned, lets make some babies before our enemies are saved the trouble of exterminating us, and we simply fade away voluntarily.
I get it. Tough to argue the point. Realpolitik. Right? Outcomes.
But that does beg the question how we ever found ourselves in such a mess to begin with. Is it your conception of the world, fellow Darwinist, that inferior ways outperform their superiors?
That don't make a whole lotta sense to me, truth be told, but I been confused more than once trying to figure out this love thing. So, what do I know, after all?
Not much. Clearly. But, I'll posit a theory. Doubtless an unpopular one. Keeping in mind, that's all it is, and not a particularly well thought out theory at that.
What if it turns out the be the case, that we are presently enduring a just punishment, for precisely the forms some would see us returned to?
Allow me to elaborate...
It's impossible not to notice that the people who scream the loudest about the problems with women in society are in large part malcontents who know little satisfaction in other areas of life. This is not to say that reasonable folks do not have reasonable complaints, but it seems a fair assessment that there are those who wouldn't know happiness of it kneeled before them with an open mouth and half shut eyes.
I cannot think of one married man who views the world in this way. For that matter, no divorcee springs to mind. Whatever he may think of his marriage, or its failure, he does not tend to think that his wife ought to have been delivered to him through contract outside of his or her choosing. Maybe both husband and wife are fortunate enough to think they married up. Maybe one or the other thinks they could have done better if they held out longer. Maybe both know they held out too long, and had to settle for someone less than they'd have had if they had settled for a better partner sooner. Maybe they hate eachother and are staying together for the kids. Maybe they said screw these brats, and got divorced anyway.
But outside of brief flirtations with misanthropy, they don't say love is a scam and call for a return to compulsory couplings. That is reserved for a very special sort of malcontent. We might all consider ourselves quite fortunate not to be governed by them, whatever the imperfections of the people currently trying to kill us.
I'll have much more to say about this when we meet tonight as we do every Wednesday at 9:30pm US Eastern for our SurrealPolitiks Members Only Video Chat.
Transaction
Created
2 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English