"A republic, madam, if you can keep it." - Benjamin Franklin. Desi putini cunosc acest concept, Democratia Direct - Participativa se constitue in urmatoarul pas evolutiv al societatii umane. Ramane de vazut daca vom alege sa evoluam sau nu. In my opinion a future administrative-political structure of a country will not just be a republic as it was the case so far. It will not work. I believe that the best possible solution for a democracy will be only with the direct participation of the public on a daily basis in government; in other words a direct participatory democracy. The key element in a direct democracy will be the control, the people control over the govt., and the control of the entire elected and on any public servant paid from the public budget and every public institution. This can be done by allowing people to vote for, or to dismiss the senators or congresmans every day, and not every 4-5 years. If one senator does not perform well, the public can get rid of it the very next day. It is now technically possible to put in practice a permanent vote system where you can elect, dismiss senators/congresmans, implement or abrogate laws; much like today many hundreds of thousands of peoples signs petitions. At #1 get rid of FED is of course a good decision, but can you keep it over time? How can you prevent a second take over in the future? No #2 to #5 are also good ideas. But again it is extremely important for the people to have all the power over the elected persons and institutions and this power must be exercised on a daily basis. For example FED didn't just appear from nowhere. The FED and other institutions alike can come into existence only if there is no effective control from the public. No #6 is more like a wish. But the key issue is the control system which must belong to the people. In my opinion the only efficient control system exercised by the public is possible only in a direct participatory democracy. This will disperse the power over a large spectrum of peoples and not just to the ones which has the biggest purchase power. Into a such system how will ever be possible for the congress to vote for a war, or to increase the military budget, or to cut from the health or education budget, or to infringe the #1 to #6 afore mentioned points from the plan? All this is possible only if a small group of peoples (the ones which have the most powerful purchase power, the corporations) are in control and owns the senate or the congress. For me the most important thing is not what to do, this is simple to named, it is basically to reverse what is doing today. The most important thing is who will have the control? And even more important, how to keep this control to the public? Theoretically, even today the control belongs to the public ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HpDTkqmtpE

... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5ec-NP_Yf4