Visit our website now: http://www.billstill.com - considered by informed insiders’ as THE ultimate resource for fixing the National Debt problem and surviving Economic or Financial Collapse/Crash and attaining the unvarnished truth about Washington and today’s United States Political Climate.
Good morning, I’m still reporting on
SR1293 – Newt Gingrich BLASTS Fox News' Megyn Kelly Over Her OBVIOUS Bias Against Donald Trump
*Megyn Kelly Over Donald Trump: ‘You Are Fascinated with Sex!’*
Good morning, I’m still reporting on Megyn Kelly getting hers.
In an interview with Newt Gingrich tonight on her show, Megyn Kelly lost control of herself as Newt Gingrich accused her of outright bias for continually inserting words like sexual predator in describing Donald Trump.
[insert]
Look, I’ve defended Megyn all along, much to my wife’s dismay. I thought she as salvageable. But this is too much. It’s time for Miss Megyn to look for another job.
She’ll have no trouble finding work on MSNBC where she can get a really intense dose of what the extreme left is really like.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good Day.
Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News. He has written 22 books and two documentary videos and is the host of his wildly popular daily YouTube Channel the “Still Report”, the quintessential report on the economy and Washington.
Connect with Bill Still:
https://www.facebook.com/BillStillOfficial
https://twitter.com/billstill?lang=en
https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3/videos
https://plus.google.com/u/0/109353617116072656672
Consider becoming a cherished sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3204630
https://youtu.be/JTT5YXrCI2g
First, first of all, THANK YOU TO THOSE OF YOU WHO DO GIVE TO THIS REPORT! Your support is very much appreciated, and I do not thank you enough.
First of all, a 30-second reminder. I can’t produce these reports for free forever. If you like my reporting, you have to provide minimal support.
If everyone who viewed these reports would step up and subscribe for just one dollar a month, I could devote all of my energies to just this report.
Go to www.billstill.com and sign up for a dollar a month. You can cancel at any time. What else can you buy for a dollar these days.
Good morning, the Chinese stock market has crashed 8.7% - the largest one-day drop since 2007.
In the past weeks, the communist Chinese government has tried its own version of quantitative easing to try to keep the bubble in the market from bursting.
Today we find out that the IMF has been advising China to stop its intervention so that market forces could set the true price of its shares. That may be the cause.
The question is how large will the effect be in European and the U.S. stock market? Currently the German and British stock markets are down more than 1.5% - the equivalent of a 280-point drop in the Dow.
But here is the worst news that will effect markets tomorrow; trading was halted in many large Chinese stocks this morning because they had exceeded the negative 10% limit imposed.
What will happen tomorrow when these stocks are cut loose?
Senate Democrat leader Harry Reid - who will be retiring from the Senate in just 16 months – has announced that Senate Democrats will mount a filibuster to try to prevent the Senate from even voting on the Iran Nuke deal.
Debate in Congress begins on Tuesday as members return from the Labor Day weekend.
Democrats want to avoid any vote on the Iran Nuke deal to avoid the embarrassment of having President Obama veto the measure that is opposed by a 2 to 1 margin across the nation – and also avoid Senate Democrats from going on the record as voting for the pro-Iran deal.
President Obama can release all sanctions against Iran on Sept. 10 unless it is still under consideration in Congress.
Either house of Congress can pass a law by a simple majority disapproving of the deal and Republicans now control both houses. However, any such vote can be filibustered only in the Senate, so a Senate filibuster will be the focus of attention this week.
If a disapproval law gets through both Houses of Congress, then it goes to President Obama for his signature and then would become law. However, Obama has threatened to veto the law.
However, it takes 67 votes in the Senate – a 2/3rds majority – to override a Presidential veto and the Republicans only have 54 of the 100 members. However the lobbying would be intense and the scrutiny is just what Democrat members do not need. In addition, during the entire process, which could last into the first of next year, President Obama’s friends in Iran would not get their 100 billion dollars back.
On top of that, Democrats have a good chance to take back the majority in the Senate in 2016, but everything has to break their way. Going on the record as having voted for the Iran Nuke deal could make all the difference for Dems and keep Republicans in control in the next Congress. So, Dems will throw everything they have at blocking the vote all together this week.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
Good Morning, I’m still reporting from Washington.
While the major media focuses on wall-to-wall coverage of the Pope’s visit to Washington, the Obama administration quietly released Abdul Shalabi from Guantanamo.
Who is he? He was Osama bin Laden’s bodyguard and one of the bodyguards of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was identified as "the principal architect of the 9/11 attacks" by the 9/11 Commission Report.
Shalabi was considered by the Bush administration as one of the most dangerous of those detained at Guantanamo. He was captured in Pakistan in 2001 and arrived in Guantanamo the first day it opened on Jan. 11, 2002.
Shalabi is among THE most determined of the Guantanamo detainees. He has been on a hunger strike since 2005. He lost 26 pounds and was within a few pounds of death when the military started force feeding him through a nasogastric tube, thereby saving his life.
He will be sent to Saudi Arabia where he will be placed into a rehabilitation program to re-integrate into society, despite an Obama military review board acknowledging that he was still likely to have sympathies to extremists.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
Candid Mobile App website: www. becandid.com
Project Veritas head, James O’Keefe may announce tonight on Hannity that his next target is the leader of the Fake News crowd, none other than the Communist News Network, CNN.
Yesterday O’Keefe was interviewed on Sean Hannity’s radio show where he revealed that a major news network has been “stung.”
O’Keefe said that in the next 48 hours – that would be sometime tomorrow – Project Veritas, will release hundreds of hours of tape from within the targeted news network.
When asked how long they have been working on this sting, O’Keefe said:
“We’ve had people on the inside come to us. Just like Julian Assange has people come to him, we've had people, sources come to us and give us information, and we're going to be releasing it "Wikileaks Style" this week.”
Smelling a good story, Hannity pounded on O”Keefe for details:
“Can you give us a hint what organizations are going to be impacted by this?”
O’Keefe: “It is one that Trump has really been talking about, you can probably use your imagination.”
I’m definitely tuning into Hannity tonight to see if there is a big announcement.
Visit our website at http://www.billstill.com
Considered by informed insiders’ as the ultimate resource for surviving economic or financial collapse/crash and attaining the unvarnished truth about the latest US and world news, current events in Washington, and today’s United States political climate. Please Like, Comment & Share.
Good evening, I’m still reporting on
Project Veritas Next Target? CNN!, 1518
Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News. He has written 22 books and two documentary videos and is the host of his wildly popular daily YouTube Channel the “Still Report”, the quintessential report on the economy and Washington.
Connect with Bill Still:
https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+BillStill
http://billstills.blogspot.in/
https://twitter.com/billstill
https://www.facebook.com/BillStillOfficial
https://www.pinterest.com/billstills/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/billstill
http://billstills.tumblr.com/
https://billstills.wordpress.com/
https://www.diigo.com/profile/billstill
https://www.reddit.com/user/billstills/
http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/billstillss
Consider becoming a cherished sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3204630
https://youtu.be/Jxgy6MXzVmA
To become Partner #487: www.billstill.com, then Click "Subscribe”.
Last night’s Republican debate set an absolute new low for the desperate manipulation of the at-home television audience during a political debate.
Did you notice how loud the cheers were for Bush and Rubio and how loud the boos were for Trump? Did you notice how small the auditorium was for what sounded like so many boos? This is in a state – South Carolina – where the latest polls show Trump leading all opponents by a 20 point margin. Did you notice that when CBS would take an audience shot during some of the booing of Trump, in the first 20 rows, there was no one visibly booing?
I just thought, those booing Trump were way at the back of the hall, or maybe up in a balcony.
But no. A Twitter person by the handle of LandmanMarius chimed in halfway through the debate that he had analyzed the audio spectrum of the volume and intensity of the clapping and it was artificially generated.
“I used TrueRTA audio spectrum analyzer. Take the CBS recording from YouTube, it truly indicates CPU clapping.”
Other Twitter users reported that the house was packed with donors with CBS microphones near specific pockets of audience.
Despite being up against all odds, Trump prevailed and as we will see in our next report dominated 7 large online polls overnight.
I’m Still reporting from Washington. Good day.
To become Partner #462: www.billstill.com, then Click "Subscribe”.
Very important article on Breitbart yesterday written by Julia Hahn.
It shows that FoxNews owner Rupert Murdoch is the co-chair of the Partnership for a New American Economy (PNAE), one of the most powerful open borders lobbying firms in the country.
Yesterday, on Bret Baier’s evening news show, Trump cryptically said he didn’t like the games Fox was playing. Could this be what Trump was referring to?
As Julia Hahn of Breitbart put it:
“Trump has shined a spotlight on one of Washington’s best kept secrets: namely, Fox’s role via its founder Rupert Murdoch in pushing an open borders agenda. The Trump campaign is a direct threat to Murdoch’s efforts to open America’s borders.”
According to Hahn, FoxNews may have played a key role in not shining their shiney new news spotlight on Sen. Marco Rubio’s 2013 Gang of 8 Immigration bill, which :
“ … would have granted immediate amnesty and eventual citizenship to millions of illegal aliens, it would have doubled the annual admission of foreign workers, and it would have dispensed 33 million green cards to foreign nationals in the span of a single decade despite current record immigration levels.”
Remember back to Republican debate #1? Megyn Kelly peppered Donald Trump with not questions about his proposals and policies, but with sensational trash talk “gotcha questions”.
Was the same questioning ferver directed at pretty boy Marco Rubio? I’m not going to go back and check two-and-a-half hours of video, but if memory serves, there were no tough questions about his scheming with the Gang of 8.
Another interesting fact, reporter Julie Hahn dug up: Bill Sammon, FoxNews vice president and Washington managing editor, is the father of Brooke Sammon, Marco Rubio’s press secretary.
In fact, the only reason the Gang of 8 open immigration plan failed in Congress was not Fox coverage, but that opponents flooded the Senate with calls, shutting down the switchboard.
Rupert Murdoch’s support for open borders is not exactly a state secret. In 2014, in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Murdoch wrote a piece entitled “Immigration Reform Can’t Wait” in which he called opponents of the Gang of 8 plan:
“… nativists who scream about amnesty…”
Well, No, Rupert! We call ourselves nationalists or patriots, and yes, we believe national sovereignty is important – very important – in fact, the last bastion of world freedom -- and we don’t believe in open borders or a wonderful, idyllic New World Order of unelected technocrats running everything and the social contract being shredded.
So Fox manipulates their coverage on the immigration issue to suit Rupert’s idyllic dreams. Mickey Kaus, a veteran analyst on immigration issues says that Fox blocks out coverage of key immigration fights in Washington, D.C. in a subtle way he calls an:
“immigration tamp-down”
As reporter Julia Hahn put it:
“As any casual viewer of Fox News would observe, one sees scant … coverage … on the record-setting, foreign-born population inside the United States;”
“…nor coverage of census findings that immigration is about to surpass all historical records;”
In other words, the Mexican border is still wide open – the undocumented aliens are still flooding in at record numbers; it’s just that Fox is no longer reporting on it.
“…nor stories on the total number of immigrants allowed into the country each year and the strain this number puts on education, the economy, the welfare states and the profound changes to U.S. culture.”
“By not covering these issues in any real depth, it helps clear the way for the enactment of the Murdoch-backed immigration agenda — bringing in the New American Century hoped for by Rupert Murdoch, Marco Rubio, and Barack Obama.”
And, I might add, Ted Cruz.
No, only Donald Trump’s strong stand against illegal immigration has shown a light of truth on this issue sufficient for the rest of us to be able to catch the scent and catch up to him.
[insert Trump ad]
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
Visit our website now: http://www.billstill.com - considered by informed insiders’ as THE ultimate resource for fixing the National Debt problem and surviving Economic or Financial Collapse/Crash and attaining the unvarnished truth about Washington and today’s United States Political Climate.
Good morning, I’m still reporting on
Was Crooked Clinton Fed Debate #3 Questions?X
Having been a reporter most of my life, I’ve had to learn to develop a reporter’s intuition. It’s not exactly a metaphysical skill. But it’s based on subtleties that I don’t fully understand – tone of voice of a person, cadence, eye movements, how people react to other people – it’s all that and more.
But I watched every second of this debate and I want to say with every fiber of my reporter’s intuition that THE most damning thing that just jumped out at me last night was that Hillary Clinton was fed at least two of the questions Mike Wallace would be asking her, and at least one trip-up question he would be asking Donald Trump.
I’m not saying Mike Wallace did it –however it is possible. But someone did – someone in the Fox News hierarchy! Perhaps Megyn Kelly, who just got nailed for collusion by Wikileaks. I’ll get to that one soon.
Here is my evidence in its totality – decide for yourself. It’s probably too late to hope for a WikiLeaks treasure. No doubt the Dems have finally awakened to more secure – though less convenient - security measures.
Let’s start at the first question – is the Constitution a living document or not? Clinton’s answer is just too perfectly crafted, memorized, rehearsed and then recited. Let’s look at it:
[insert]
She had 2 minutes. She took exactly 2 and 7 seconds – but 4 seconds of that was thanking UNLV for hosting the debate. Net total? 2 minutes 3 seconds of perfectly-composed Clinton rhetoric.
And this at the point of absolute maximum pressure in this campaign. Even Chris Wallace was sort of stuttering his way through the first question – and he’s obviously practiced saying it just right.
Can you believe the incredible gall of this woman getting up and in her opening statement to talk about “dark, unaccountable money to come into our electoral system.” Then she even gets in a plug for Obama’s supreme court nominee – all in just 2 minutes 3 seconds.
Trump, on the other hand is fairly cool on the exterior, but inside you know he’s sweating bullets trying to come up with something that sounds even half-way as perfectly formulated as Clinton.
Now, let’s see how Trump did:
[insert]
Wow! 2 min. 1 second – just totally masterful for off the top of your head! But obviously not scripted. He just watched the clock and wanted to play fair.
And speaking of wanting to play fair. Where the Clintons would lie about anything out of habit, even if telling the truth would be more helpful to them. Trump is just the opposite, his knee-jerk reaction is to always tell the truth right off the top of his head – even if it hurts him.
Remember debate #1 of the Republican primary season where it was only Donald Trump who raised his hand that he would not support some of those on stage if they became the nominee. To their everlasting shame many of those who didn’t raise their hands have now violated that pledge.
So here’s Wallace’s trick question:
[insert Wallace]
Once again, Trump could have dodged around, but no. Even though he contradicts his running mate and his daughter, Trump tells the truth. Oh, and by the way watch Clinton’s smile. She knew this question was coming.
[insert]
Look at Crooked Clinton’s face. It’s like she’s thinking, damn! He brought up that Pew Report. Maybe this wasn’t such a good idea afterall.
[insert]
Ok, now let’s move on to the ultra critical last question – the question with the potential to be the of the utmost importance going out of the debate.
[insert Wallace – Clinton]
Perfect Hillary! Exactly 61 seconds. And I really loved that part about standing up for families against powerful corporations. Bet you might have some problems backing that one up.
[insert]
Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News.
Connect with Bill Still:
https://www.facebook.com/BillStillOfficial
https://twitter.com/billstill?lang=en
https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3/videos
https://plus.google.com/u/0/109353617116072656672
Consider becoming a cherished sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3204630
https://youtu.be/-GXkx2EI70c
I’ve been reporting on the USC Daybreak poll, which still has Clinton ahead of Trump by seven-tenths of one percent.
Then someone emailed me a website called LongRoom. It compares the various statistical skews or biases of all the polls and removes them.
As we saw in Still Report #1096 – How Clinton Rigs the Polls, at Nate Silver’s “538” office, pollsters congregate in their break room and talk about “skews” and biases.
Applying skews to data can be completely legitimate. For example, let’s say you get opinions from 200 people in city A and only 100 people from city B.
If you know the historic voting patterns, then you know what weight to give one city over the other. This is a statistical skew.
They are necessary because if historically, twice as many people tend to vote for Democrats in City A then you know you have to apply that skew to that city’s data to get a fair view – make them equally weighted.
The alternative would be to try to get an exact number of people from each city to answer your questions based on their previous biases – an impossible task.
But the downside is that polls are products that someone buys and pays for and they expect certain results. So, the easiest way to provide what the customer wants is to manipulate the skews.
Longroom understands this and gives you data that unbiases the skews, so you get an honest look at the polling data coming in from all the pollsters.
[Insert]
For example, here you see that the average media polling bias today is 4.2% favoring the Democrats. Then it lists the biases of 5 of the top polls.
You’ll notice that I was on the right track. The USC Daybreak poll is the least biased with only 1.4% bias towards the Dems. CNN, however has an outrageous 7.1% bias.
If we look at today’s Daybreak poll, Clinton leads with 44.7% and Trump has 44%. That means that Trump’s real number – when you add in 1.4% of his initial 44% should be 44.60% and Clinton’s number should go down to 44.07. That puts Trump in the lead by over one-half point, instead of down by .7 percent.
So while this does show the relative direction of the votes, we all know that the “Monster” vote is going to be a huge factor and it is entirely outside of this statistical system.
No matter how accurately these polls are cleansed of the skews or biases, the Monster vote is coming from people who just not been counted in the past. They either haven’t voted in the past, or would have been counted as either independents or Democrats, but now will be crossing over en masse.
Bottom line - these polls can say whatever they want, but no one knows how big the monster vote will be – 10%, 20% or more, it is literally the 600-pound gorilla in this room this year.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.