Having recently watched numerous response videos on 'Why America Sucks At Everything,' I decided to cover this video, whether I have done so in the past, this is may or may not be a different response. David Cross of the Gravel Institute makes a lot of reasonable arguments about American healthcare, however, doesn't seem to understand the consequences past the face value of the "free" healthcare here in Britain, nor does he seem to comprehend the reality of the Scandinavian countries. The crux of his argument falls apart based on the fact that the main American healthcare market is anti-capitalist and since government is the cause of the problems relative to the costs and overall inefficiency, the solution to the problem is to remove government from the economy and healthcare, not to cry out for more government. I have seen numerous people responding on 'why America sucks at everything' and it seems they typically agree with the points David Cross makes, but are they aware of Direct Primar Care, do they actually know the reasons behind why the American main healthcare market costs got out of control? The answer to that is, no. Time and time again I have seen this argument pop up relative to American healthcare and is a shame I feel like I'm repeating myself, but how can one help that when the same arguments are being pushed out there time and time again. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPeEoxS5eP4

The Universal Basic Income is something widely supported by the left, this is a case against why not to support the Universal Basic Income by speaker Davie Ballentine from the Scottish Libertarian Party. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HArWAeGWzmU

In this video I refute Adam Something on the fatal flaw of free market capitalism. As always what you find are the baseless claims and assertions about capitalism, critiques always make such baseless claims without providing any real world examples to back up what they claim and Adam Something is really no different. From his made up scenario of being stranded on an island, to his baseless claims regarding totalitarianism comparing business owners to that of 17th century feudal lords illustrates how irrational Adam Something really is. It is every bit as infantile as the claim that working for a company owner equates to slavery, when in reality, it doesn't. I've illustrated in other videos proving that even throughout the 19th century, such history contradicts his fallacious claims which he tries to go down the usual route of claiming how 'exploitative' capitalism is without going into detail about his alternative, that's because the alternative is an absolute disaster that nobody in the right mind could defend to make argument for. It is important to reiterate the fact that without the ability for a private individual owner to own and run their own private business, there is no private individual ownership, therefore, no individual ownership. Complaining that a private company owner is the one who dictates how a business is run illustrates the ignorance of the likes of Adam Something, he completely ignores the fact the owner and creator of the business has his or her rights to have created the business in the first place and it is rightfully their own property. To lay claim that employees should have some right in how it is run is erroneous, after all, an employee is not employed for such reason and an employee becomes an employee through voluntary contractual agreement. Adam Something goes off on a tangent which I didn't go into too much detail about people moving, a free market opens up vast opportunity, they wouldn't need to move, but how convenient of him to use that argument, given the fact his socialism has destroyed the job market and forced people to do just that, Scotland is a prime example for this, why else you think businesses are packing up and moving South of the border? Even his argument regarding Anarcho-Capitalism is erroneous, making such a baseless claim with nothing to back it with that private security would somehow quickly centralise and act as a gestapo for a company, making such a baseless assertion that under such a system a business owner could commit violent crime and wouldn't be punished for it. Again, nothing to back up such baseless claims, just lunacy ignoring the fact Anarcho-Capitalism is not lawless. It's quite rich he speaks about dictatorship given the fact that in order to maintain a position of so-calle ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPr-tcOnRWI

In this debate with BadMouseProductions on Libertarian Views I set out in debunking his arguments on Libertarianism. For me BadMouseProductions fails to grasp important things such as Supply and Demand, he doesn't fully understand Capitalism and therefore in my view is the reason he switched from Capitalism to Socialism. There are several points in his argument which will be addressed. In this first part video I explain why Socialism is a contradiction to Libertarianism as you cannot infringe upon an individuals liberty and rights and claim that as Libertarian. BadMouseProductions has a hard time understanding that workers have the free choice to work for other people or starting up their own entrepreneurial business. As I ask in the video is to point out who is going to stop people such as myself starting up my own private business when they have no government there to stop me. The fact they seek to steal private business owners businesses from them by use of force seeking to prevent individual liberty pretty much proves the contradiction of Libertarian Socialism, you cannot seek to 'PREVENT' individual private ownership and then say you're for liberty at the same time. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AifRIa681DI