David Mack, Assoc. AIA | Resolution 17-5 | 2017 AIA Business Meeting
David Mack, Assoc. AIA, speaks in support of Resolution 17-5 at the 2017 AIA Business Meeting. Resolution 17-5, which was sponsored by 70 members of the AIA, called upon the AIA to support a new WTC 7 investigation. It garnered just 4% of the vote, despite the fact that nearly half of the AIA members surveyed by AE911Truth after the vote agreed it was likely - if not completely evident - that WTC 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition.
Ad una visuale ravvicinata dei detriti che vengono espulsi dalla Torre Sud del World Trade Center, non appena la sezione superiore cade verso est mostra numerosi "proiettili" fumanti che sembrano comete. Molti di essi possono essere visti esplodere. Uno di questi è qui seguito. Esso espelle due frammenti, entrambi espongono delle esplosioni secondarie. (Nota, il frammento in salita sulla sinistra del "proiettile" in esame sembra essere un oggetto in rotolamento che alterna dal nero al bianco all'invisibile. Passa dietro uno dei frammenti descritti nel video.)
Questo è il link alla playlist con altri video di AE911Truth sottotitolati in italiano:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAF177CCCFF880051&feature=view_all
Assicuratevi di visitare la sezione italiana di AE911Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/news/languages/italian.html), così come la pagina Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ae911truthit/
South Tower Exploding Projectile by David Chandler - Italian
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uq21PdeW4xE
Do the seismic data from the events at the World Trade Center corroborate the eyewitness, video, and forensic evidence of controlled demolition?
(Please see our FAQ on this subject at AE911Truth.org:
http://www.ae911truth.org/news/faqs.html for greater detail on this question from which the following is taken.)
Short Answer:
Yes. It is beyond doubt that the seismic data recorded by Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO) in Palisades, New York, corroborate the eyewitness, video, and forensic evidence of explosions both before and during the collapse of all three WTC towers — and explosions even before the plane impacts into the Twin Towers. Our conclusion, which is based on our review of the studies conducted by the researchers and seismic experts listed below, match the LDEO's seismic data. But because the LDEO did not rely on its own data when it issued its report, our conclusions do not match the LDEO's conclusions. Thus, our conclusions also contradict the conclusions of the FEMA and NIST reports, which relied upon the LDEO report's conclusions and not upon the original seismic data.
We also recommend that you read the article, "Point TT-7: Why Did the Twin Towers Collapse? The Seismic Evidence,” by the 9/11 Consensus Panel.
For more information: visit http://AE911Truth.org
and http://WTC7Evaluation.org
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5Z3640EipE
This video is included in Appendix A of the paper, “How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers’ Explosive Demolition on 9/11." Read the paper at https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/technical-articles/articles-by-ae911truth/696.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaJKV7WRETE
9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 1 - World Trade Center 7
Course Number: AE911-AAG-OD1
Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses provide the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures.
Course Description:
In Part 1 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence regarding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story high-rise that was not struck by an airplane.
The damage WTC 7 suffered from the collapse of the North Tower was found to be inconsequential. It had fires that were similar to those that have occurred previously in high-rise buildings. Yet it fell symmetrically into its own footprint in the manner of a typical controlled demolition.
In 2008, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7’s destruction was caused by normal office fires that burned “at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings.”
Is NIST’s explanation for this unprecedented structural failure valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence.
Learning Objectives:
Participants will be able to:
1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence.
2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition.
3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
4. Analyze the physical evidence and dynamics of Building 7’s collapse according to how consistent they are with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition.
For more information: visit http://AE911Truth.org
and http://WTC7Evaluation.org
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7ZYOPtOqUU
La ligne de toit du WTC 1 (la Tour Nord) commence sa chute brusquement, continue son accélération vers la bas à environ 64 % de l'accélération de la gravité et disparaît dans un nuage de poussière. Le bâtiment rencontre donc une résistance équivalente à environ 36 % de son poids. Cela implique, par contre, que la force exercée sur la partie inférieure du bâtiment n'est également que de l'ordre de 36 % de son poids - beaucoup moins que si le bâtiment était immobile. Les données de l'accélération prouvent donc que la chute de la partie suprérieure du bâtiment ne peut être responsable de la destruction de la partie inférieure. Une analyse complète a été publiée dans l'article intitulé "Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics," Journal of 9/11 Studies, Vol 28, Feb 2010: http://journalof911studies.com/volume... (Quelques notions de base de calcul et de physique sont cependant nécessaires.)
Voici un lien qui vous permettra de visionner d'autres vidéos de AE911Truth en français :
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL998F0156BC37835F&feature=view_all
Assurez-vous de visiter la section française du site AE911Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/news/languages/french.html), ainsi que la page française de AE911Truth sur Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/ae911truthfr/
North Tower Acceleration by David Chandler - French
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWWR4ltSOx0
9∕11真理的蓝图 10分钟
Chinese 10 min. version of architects and engineers great documentary Blueprint for Truth.
这个链接会带你到一个播放列表,其中都是AE911Truth做的配有英文字幕的视频
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD948BE57BC763318&feature=view_all
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGhcHbWt_y0
This video is included in Appendix A of the paper, “The Triumph of the Official Narrative: How the TV Networks Hid the Twin Towers’ Explosive Demolition on 9/11.”
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhF1x0vpX1s
This video is included in Appendix A of the paper, “How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers’ Explosive Demolition on 9/11." Read the paper at https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/technical-articles/articles-by-ae911truth/696.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmX0GSJCCac
ジョナサン・コールはこれらの力のこもった実験で、NIST(米国国立標準技術院)をニュートンにぶつける。
ここからAE911Truthによるその他の日本語字幕付きビデオ・プレーリストにリンクします。
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL09323FB9CD0C300B&feature=view_all
Newton vs NIST by Jonathan Cole - 日本語字幕
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fYU5-3bwgE