Published By
Created On
24 Aug 2020 20:42:05 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
Medicine, Entrepreneurship, and Health Policy with Ray March
This podcast episode was originally posted on January 13th, 2017.
What follows is an edited transcript of my discussion with Ray March about the economics of medicine and health insurance. We had a fascinating and far-reaching discussion about health care policy, both in the United States and Canada, as well as some cases of entrepreneurship in the medical sector.
This includes a slightly awkward discussion of the development of sexual pharmacology, the early experiments with nitrates and Viagra, and the, uhhh, “firmness” those drugs produce. Enjoy!
Petersen: My guest today is Ray March of Texas Tech University. Ray, welcome to Economics Detective Radio.
March: Thanks for having me.
Petersen: So our topic today is the economics of medicine. Ray’s research concerns entrepreneurship and regulation in medicine. Let’s start by talking about this idea of entrepreneurship in medicine.
The medical field isn’t like Silicon Valley. You can’t just launch a pharmaceutical company out of your parents’ garage. In fact, the whole field is tightly regulated and controlled by the government both in the United States and Canada, other countries. So how do people in the medical field still manage to be entrepreneurial?
March: Entrepreneurship is fundamentally a question about how do I find resources I have now and put them towards their best use and that will help me turn a profit and therefore we have market signals. You’re right to point out medicine is a much more regulated area compared to other service industries but what makes medicine entrepreneurial is that there’s always a void to discover, there’s always a need to find better uses and better cures or better ways to treat patients.
And because the government is usually behind the curve in terms of the advancement of science—and this is particularly true in health science and medicine—there’s always opportunities for entrepreneurship. And a lot of my research explains or tries to explore what are these areas of medicine or of health just more broadly that the government is not involved in because they’re not necessarily aware that this is an emerging field. And that leaves room for scientists and more broadly entrepreneurs to come and fill in gaps.
Petersen: Okay. So, when you say the government is behind the curve, a big part of that is the Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, in the United States. And of course it has its equivalent in other countries as well. So, tell me a little bit about the FDA. So, if I discovered a new drug, what kind of process would it take for me to bring it to market in the United States?
March: If you want to go through the FDA procedure usually takes between 12 and 20 years and somewhere around a billion dollars of investment. You bring it
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_N5OkjIqhk
What follows is an edited transcript of my discussion with Ray March about the economics of medicine and health insurance. We had a fascinating and far-reaching discussion about health care policy, both in the United States and Canada, as well as some cases of entrepreneurship in the medical sector.
This includes a slightly awkward discussion of the development of sexual pharmacology, the early experiments with nitrates and Viagra, and the, uhhh, “firmness” those drugs produce. Enjoy!
Petersen: My guest today is Ray March of Texas Tech University. Ray, welcome to Economics Detective Radio.
March: Thanks for having me.
Petersen: So our topic today is the economics of medicine. Ray’s research concerns entrepreneurship and regulation in medicine. Let’s start by talking about this idea of entrepreneurship in medicine.
The medical field isn’t like Silicon Valley. You can’t just launch a pharmaceutical company out of your parents’ garage. In fact, the whole field is tightly regulated and controlled by the government both in the United States and Canada, other countries. So how do people in the medical field still manage to be entrepreneurial?
March: Entrepreneurship is fundamentally a question about how do I find resources I have now and put them towards their best use and that will help me turn a profit and therefore we have market signals. You’re right to point out medicine is a much more regulated area compared to other service industries but what makes medicine entrepreneurial is that there’s always a void to discover, there’s always a need to find better uses and better cures or better ways to treat patients.
And because the government is usually behind the curve in terms of the advancement of science—and this is particularly true in health science and medicine—there’s always opportunities for entrepreneurship. And a lot of my research explains or tries to explore what are these areas of medicine or of health just more broadly that the government is not involved in because they’re not necessarily aware that this is an emerging field. And that leaves room for scientists and more broadly entrepreneurs to come and fill in gaps.
Petersen: Okay. So, when you say the government is behind the curve, a big part of that is the Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, in the United States. And of course it has its equivalent in other countries as well. So, tell me a little bit about the FDA. So, if I discovered a new drug, what kind of process would it take for me to bring it to market in the United States?
March: If you want to go through the FDA procedure usually takes between 12 and 20 years and somewhere around a billion dollars of investment. You bring it
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_N5OkjIqhk
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
Unspecified
More from the publisher
Controlling
VIDEO
THE B
the-blockchain-anti-trust-paradox-with
Originally posted on June 23, 2018.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3oCUq-61sE
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
INSTI
institutional-cryptoeconomics-with
Originally released on January 13, 2019.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO4qNhlm-OM
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
VIDEO
WHAT
what-is-money
http://economicsdetective.com/
Let's talk about money. Recall the simple economy developed in "Gains From Trade". We had two people, Jane and Gilberto-Rahoule, who were trading bananas and fish. There wasn't much reason for Jane and Gilberto-Rahoule to use money, since they were only trading with each other, and they were doing it simultaneously.
Let's imagine, however, that Jane and Gilberto-Rahoule do have money on their little island, and that they both accept it in trade for their goods. Jane gives Gilberto-Rahoule a banana in return for a dollar, and then Gilberto-Rahoule gives Jane a fish in return for that same dollar.
The result? Jane and Gilberto-Rahoule have traded one fish for one banana just like they did before, but with an intermediate step. Seems pretty useless in this situation, but it segues nicely into one of the older laws in Economics, Say's Law. Say's Law states that products (like bananas) are paid for in products (like fish). It was popularized by Jean-Baptiste Say who said,
"Money performs but a momentary function in this double exchange; and when the transaction is finally closed, it will always be found, that one kind of commodity has been exchanged for another."
But if you're just trading things for other things, why add an intermediate step? Here's another example.
Let's say that bananas only grow in the warm months, and fish only migrate past the island in the cold months, and that both of these foods go bad at the end of the season. Now, without trade, Jane will be underfed in the cold months because she is no good at fishing, and Gilberto-Rahoule will be underfed in the warm months because he is no good at picking bananas.
Let's say that it's the summer solstice, and both islanders know that at the winter solstice they will be rescued by a ship. There's going to be a warm season and then a cold season, and then rescue.
Gilberto-Rahoule says to Jane, "Look, I'm having trouble picking bananas this warm season. How about you give me some of your bananas this season, and I'll give you some fish next season?" to which Jane replies, "No. I'm not giving you bananas because I can't trust you to give me fish. There's nothing to make you keep your promise."
So in this situation, there won't be any gains from trade because there won't be any trade. However, now let's imagine that Gilberto-Rahoule has some American greenbacks in his pocket. He and Jane know that they will be able to spend this money after rescue.
Gilberto-Rahoule can offer greenbacks for bananas in the warm months, and then he can offer fish for greenbacks in the cold months, and Jane will take the deal because she knows that greenbacks have real value. The existence of money has allowed our islanders to trade perishable goods across tim
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InwVM6s7WoY
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
INDIA
indian-constitutional-political-economy
Originally released on January 5th, 2018.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CFsTmkwYCc
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
PRICE
price-theory-and-the-minimum-wage
This podcast episode was originally posted on September 12, 2014.
For my more up-to-date views on this topic, see my recent conversation with one of the authors of the Seattle minimum wage study: http://economicsdetective.com/2017/07/seattle-minimum-wage-study-ekaterina-jardim/
The original show notes follow.
The minimum wage is a contentious issue among economists, and yet it enjoys near-universal support among the public. In my view, public views of the minimum wage are simply the result of a lack of careful thought by most people. Daniel Kahneman’s theory that people, when faced with a difficult question, substitute a simpler question that they can easily answer, applies particularly well in this case. People answer the question of whether they would like people to earn more when the real question is whether government should mandate higher wages (I first heard this argument from Bryan Caplan on EconLog).
A purely empirical argument for or against the minimum wage is methodologically wrong-headed because empirics do not speak for themselves. Sound theory must be the economist’s first tool in understanding the effect of a policy such as the minimum wage.
Before we can understand something like the minimum wage, we must understand the role of prices in allocating factors of production to their various uses. The price of a factor signals to entrepreneurs that that factor is scarce, that it is needed elsewhere in the economy, and that the entrepreneur who can reduce his usage of relatively more scarce factors in favour of relatively less scarce ones can earn profits, while entrepreneurs who fail to do so earn losses. I give the example of a sandwich shop during an oil boom; the high price of labour caused by the oil boom leads the sandwich shop to substitute away from labour in various ways.
The oil boom in my illustration is irrelevant to the story. The sandwich shop would adapt to an increased price of labour no matter what caused it. If the cause is a minimum wage law, the people no longer employed making sandwiches are involuntarily unemployed rather than finding employment in some other industry.
Minimum wage opponents sometimes get into trouble when they draw supply and demand curves to illustrate the impact of the price floor. The problem with this is that supply and demand diagrams come with built-in assumptions that do not hold true in the case of labour markets. Low-skilled labour is not a homogeneous quantity being sold in a centralized market. The simple supply-and-demand story does not capture all the effects of the minimum wage. For instance, firms substitute between different sorts of workers affected by the minimum wage. In addition, the other terms of employment contracts can change in response to a minimum wage law, such a
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gh_2UXFHh4
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
DRINK
drinking-through-the-unfree-world-with
Originally released on July 27, 2019.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBMWN2d7TE4
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
FIRMS
firms-and-profits
http://economicsdetective.com/
Let's talk about firms. A firm is an agent that converts capital and labour into products to sell. It then collects the residual between the cash value of the goods it sells and the cost of the inputs.
Firms act to maximize their profits. For most of history profits were referred to as "overcharge". Merchants were seen as simply stealing from everyone else when they earned a profit. Adam Smith was the first to articulate the social value of profits, realizing that profits lead merchants to use resources and knowledge in an efficient way, which helps rather than hurts consumers.
So, let's talk about profit. If I spend $1000 on my business and after 1 year I've made $1000, what is my total profit? If you said zero, you're wrong. If this were an accounting video you'd be right, but it's an economics video so you're wrong. In economics, the cost of something is the alternative forgone, and I could have invested my $1000 in a savings account, so my profit is actually negative. If I would have earned $50 as interest in my savings account, my profit is negative $50.
That brings me to another point, that profits can be positive or negative and often are negative. If a firm spends $1000 to produce 100 widgets, and the price of widgets falls to $1, then that firm is going to lose money and earn negative profit.
Now let's talk math. Let's say we have a firm producing airplanes. To do that, it needs inputs, in this case capital and labour. We can graph those.
Then we say that the firm produces according to some production function. Just like with utility we're going to take a level set of the production function to show all the amounts of capital and labour it takes to make a certain number of airplanes, say 3 of them. This level set is called an isoquant.
Now let's say capital costs $10 per unit, and labour costs $20 per unit, and say our firm is going to spend $1000 on production. The firm can buy at most 100 units of capital and 50 units of labour. We can graph these two points, and connect them with a line to show every combination of capital and labour that can be purchased for $1000.
As you can see, there is one place where the line intersects with our isoquant. That means that at that point, the firm is spending $1000 to produce 3 airplanes, they're buying 50 units of capital and 25 units of labour. We have here the beginnings of a supply model.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiISS6I1Rr8
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
RE-TH
re-thinking-the-so-called-housing-bubble
Originally released on March 17, 2019.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALy5amLiYLg
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
CLIMA
climate-change-carbon-taxes-and-geo
Originally released on November 9, 2018.
Today’s guest is Bob Murphy of Texas Tech University. We discuss his work on climate change and the social cost of carbon.
Bob started working on issues related to climate change when he began working with the Institute for Energy Research. We discuss the implications of the Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) used to evaluate the impact of climate change, the pivotal role played by discount rates in evaluating any kind of climate policy, the pitfalls of carbon taxation, and the opportunities presented by geo-engineering technologies.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETeejH3mTI0
Transaction
Created
1 month ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4