Consider these statements from world-renown physicists: > ***"I have come to believe that the motion of the Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment"*** -Physicist, Albert Einstein > ***"We do not have and cannot have any means of discovering whether or not we are carried along in a uniform motion of translation"*** -Physicist, Henri Poincare > ***"A great deal of research has been carried out concerning the influence of the Earth's movement. The results were always negative"*** -Physicist, Henri Poincare > ***"The data \[of Michelson-Morley\] were almost unbelievable...There was only one other possible conclusion to draw - that the Earth was at rest"*** -Physicist, Bernard Jaffe > ***"We can't feel our motion through space, nor has any physical experiment ever proved that the Earth actually is in motion."*** -Historian, Lincoln Barnett Indeed, all quite shocking statements to most of us arm-chair physicists at home. Let me try to put it into some context. Our planets sit in the great void of space. Forget what you've been taught/told about Earth rotating. When you look out, is the rest of everything rotating around us, or are we spinning? This was/is exactly the conundrum. There is no absolute frame of reference, only relative frames of reference, so we make assumptions based on those relative observances and tune our instruments, satellites, etc, to that. And it works. **Well, along comes what appears to be an absolute frame of reference.** Energy emanating from everywhere in the universe - at us - at Earth! And, grouping along what's called the ecliptic of the earth. Shocking. And so shocking that we sent three different satellites up to measure it, all receiving the same information. The logical conclusion being that the Earth is at the center...of everything. What does this mean? Do we explain it away? Do we accept it and figure out how to move forward adjusting anything along the way? Has the Theory of Relativity been proven wrong? Difficult questions, civilization changing answers.