Last [Friday’s shootings in Christchurch](https://www.oye.news/news/shootings/breaking-man-opens-fire-on-a-tram-in-the-dutch-city-of-utrecht/), New Zealand which ended with 50 dead and just as many injured have rung the global bell on a call for tougher media censorship. Yesterday an open letter from Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu, who is the head of Counter-Terrorism Policing in the UK was published on the counter-terrorism website. Basu’s letter is a plea for the UK Government to recognise the threat that the free flow of information can have on a nation and to do something about it. Basu points out the ironic fact that *“the same media companies who have lambasted social media platforms for not acting fast enough to remove extremist content are simultaneously publishing uncensored Daesh propaganda on their websites, or make the rambling ‘manifestos’ of crazed killers available for download.”* He said extremist propaganda that might reach tens of thousands of people through their own channels or networks has the potential to reach tens of millions if a national newspaper published it. He goes onto say in summary that: > ‘Society needs to look carefully at itself. We cannot simply hide behind the mantra of freedom of speech. That freedom is not an absolute right, it is not the freedom to cause harm – that is why our hate speech legislation exists.’ [source](https://www.counterterrorism.police.uk/acso-neil-basu-issues-open-letter-about-reporting-of-terrorism/) Basu continually refers to this dangerous information that the UK’s media is publishing as Terrorist propaganda, which he claims inspires other potential terrorists into action, he bases this assessment from the statements of terrorists his team have interviewed over the years. I think it is undeniable that information can be dangerous, it can reinforce beliefs and prejudices, it can raise one’s emotions causing anger and fear. This is true whether the information is accurate or not. Information which has been designed to produce a specific public emotional response, propaganda, is even more dangerous – But, it’s not the root of the problem, it merely accelerates an exceptionally small minority of people to do what they were inevitably going to do anyway. Censoring our media is a far more dangerous path to take, with dire consequences. A government which controls its media and dictates the flow of information is a Government who has a self-perpetuating power and thus unbreakable control over its people. While we have been condemning dictatorships across the World for decades with the oppression they place upon their people through censorship and their own propaganda we are voluntarily begging for it ourselves, a little bit at a time. ______________________ Read this article in its original format and thousands more over on our [WEBSITE](https://www.oye.news/news/freedoms/censorship/christchurch-shootings-inspire-global-censorship/)

We all know the official line on Vaccines, they are of course, Safe and effective. The science is settled, the debate is over and long may we all prosper in a World without contagious diseases – well, as long as those pesky anti-vaxxers die off. But there is one small problem with this narrative, it’s based solely on a blind faith not dissimilar to the blind faith we see in religious groups and cults. If you say something for long enough and shut down any debate on the topic, eventually it will become a truth in many peoples reality. #### SCIENTIFIC CULT A cult by definition is a system of religious veneration and devotion directed towards a particular figure or object. In this case, the object or figure whichever way you want to look at it is the pharmaceutical scientific body, often referred to as ‘Big Pharma’. They can be thought of as the ‘God’ if we are talking in terms of Religion. As with just about all other Religions and cults its followers are indoctrinated by texts which are often preached by figures within the community of followers. These texts require no factual basis as they are written by the God and therefore are unquestionable truths which all followers are expected to believe using the strong faith they have in the cult’s ideology. One of the most efficient practices used to capture the hearts and minds of followers in any cult is fear, in many religions, this is in the form of eternal suffering afterlife, in hell for example. Some cults use the fear of imminent Armageddon on earth to ensure their followers adhere to the ideology prescribed by those in the upper echelons of the cult. When it comes to the Scientific Cult of Vaccines it’s the fear of death by deadly diseases. The fear of your children being exposed to various silent and invisible killers known as viruses. These viruses can strike at any moment unless you follow the scriptures of big pharma that is. #### VACCINES ARE SAFE & EFFECTIVE This is the slogan taunted by the cult, it is an all-encompassing answer to all those that attempt to question the Scientific Vaccine Cult. But really, just how safe and effective are they? First of all, the statement is a very loose statement as the term ‘vaccines’ is so broad as it covers dozens of different products, produced by dozens of different manufacturers. #### THE ‘NOT SO SAFE & EFFECTIVE’ The Poliovirus Vaccine which was distributed between 1955 and 1963 is probably one of the most well-known Vaccines which clearly were not safe. Millions of people were vaccinated with this vaccine throughout the period and it was later discovered all were exposed to the Simian Virus 40 (SV40), this virus was found to present in the monkey kidney cultures used to prepare the vaccine. SV40 is a potent tumour virus with broad tissue tropism that provably induces tumours in rodents. Studies concluded that SV40 increased rates of ependymomas by 37%, osteogenic sarcomas by 26%, other bone tumours by 34% and mesothelioma by 90%. Another Polio Vaccine has raised issues in India, where although the Country was declared as ‘Polio-Free’ in 2014 by the World Health Organisation they are seeing the consequences of the Vaccine itself on its population as non-polio acute flaccid paralysis cases sky-rocket. > *‘it has actually become the nation with the world’s highest rate of NPAFP incidence. In the past 13 months, India has reported 53,563 cases of NPAFP at a national rate of 12 per 100,000 children—way above the global benchmark set by WHO of 2 per 100,000.‘ [source](https://www.oye.news/news/health/india-proclaimed-polio-free-cases-non-polio-paralysis-increased-dramatically/)* A study from the US National Library of Medicine concluded that their ‘observation supports the hypothesis that the frequency of pulse polio administration is directly or indirectly related to the incidence of NPAFP.’ So lets put this into perspective, the National Polio Surveillance Project data shows that the polio eradication programme has actually increased paralysis among children – from 1,005 cases yearly in 1996 to 60,992 cases in 2012, most now being classified as NPAFP instead of polio. It was observed in 2005 that, against 66 cases of polio caused by the wild polio virus that year, 1,645 were caused by the vaccine. As the number of polio doses given to every child has increased exponentially over the years, the number of children affected by the vaccine has climbed new heights. Data reveals that those vaccinated are 6.26 times more likely to be paralysed. [read more](https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/indias-poliofree-status-a-cruel-joke-43847) ________________________ [Read More](https://www.oye.news/news/health/vaccines/vaccines-are-safe-effective-a-cult-driven-by-blind-faith/)

All the big players have already done so and it was only a matter of time before Twitter followed suit and joined the herd. Twitter has announced the launch of their new search features which they claim will help users find credible information on Vaccines. In a [Blog post](https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2019/helping-you-find-reliable-public-health-information-on-twitter.html) Twitter vice president of trust and safety Del Harvey wrote: > *‘We recently launched a new tool so when someone searches for certain keywords associated with vaccines, a prompt will direct individuals to a credible public health resource. In the United States, we partnered with the U.S. [Department of Health & Human Services](https://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/index.html) and point people to [vaccines.gov](https://www.vaccines.gov/).’* He went on to say: > *‘This new investment builds on our existing work to guard against the artificial amplification of non-credible content about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. We already ensure that advertising content does not contain misleading claims about the cure, treatment, diagnosis or prevention of certain diseases and conditions, including vaccines.‘* With all the major players online now on board and dancing to the same state orchestrated tune, finding information other than that which is in line with the state narrative is becoming increasingly more difficult. Don’t misunderstand us, of course there is plenty of false information online surrounding the topic of Vaccines, both in support of vaccines and in opposition to vaccines – however, this latest clamp down across all social media platforms is not about ensuring accurate information to its users, its about providing one voice on the subject. A voice which is preached by the Pharmaceutical companies and echoed by the health authorities and governments from around the World. We urge everyone to do their own research, don’t blindly trust information from either side of the debate, but also don’t dismiss information from either side of the debate. Look at it all, come to your own conclusions and come to an informed decision. That is your right. ______________ Head over to [OYE NEWS](https://www.oye.news) for all the latest in unfiltered news from around the World.

Just hours after the already infamous interview with Prince Andrew was aired on the BBC, where the Prince stated he doesn’t really party among dozens of other ridiculous statements, pictures emerge which seem to contradict his non-partying claims.        If you haven’t watched the interview yet, you really should – If you had any doubts about the validity of the claims against Prince Andrew and his relationship to Jeffery Epstein and Epsteins sex slaves this might just clear up those doubts. [](https://www.oye.news/news/monarchy/bbc-and-prince-andrew-perform-damage-control-interview/)