I think these symbols are a bit too similar.
Nothing new under the sun. People get more stupid and less aware every day. 1984 is here and has always been here. Those who see things for what they are are derided and ridiculed into obscurity or keep their mouths shut.
There are no Arab terrorists and only MI5 and MI6 agents are pretending to bring about Muslim fundamentalist states, of the kind in American puppet regimes, which aren't actually run by genuine Muslims.
Did you even know about the SRR? I didn't think you'd've heard of them.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tX_isF5N7bw
England's got a well established history for licencing illegal and criminal things by Royal Decree. Now this is bought into focus, with licences to privateer and kill in mind, please consider the practicality of providing children and other sex related services to targets and potentially blackmailing them, and how this would work if the facilitator wasn't in receipt of a licence.
If Sir Savile had one, then who else had one, and who's got one now?
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHSZRZo7HpM
Ambley Wood, Gillingham, near to Campus Way, accessible most easily described as the North to South entrance into woods from Bailey Drive.
51.362296, 0.573275
I'd been up there two or three days before and had seen that as always these things were there, but there were actually quite a few.
It's very cold outside. Not weather for children strolling around picking up sticks. These things are all over England and yet no one's ever seen anyone making them. They're done at might in the pitch black
Giving chimps human rights in New Zealand didn't happen just because. Things don't happen just because. Nothing has ever happened just because. Only retards think things happen just because.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNEoPAl6sFo
*BECAUSE IT WASN'T A "COVER UP". It was a clever ploy to avert attention from the publication of the 7/7 London Bombings, a.k.a. cover up. This mass publicity is totally inconsistent with a cover up. It's the antithetical of a cover up.
People speculate that the McCanns (Jerry and Kate) had some dirt on the government and called in a favour. I'd not say the mass publicity was much of a favour, and their actions in setting up a defence fund, fraudulently mascarading as a Find Madeline Fund's set up was very proficient and was not objected to by the UK authorities.
I'm certain that it's more a case of what the British establishment had on the McCanns, and the layers of lies put out about the case makes speculation on them highly unreliable---and for the purposes of this theory, irrelevant.
I believe that the Portuguese government went along with not charging the McCanns as they were offered a deal. This then extended to the Gancalo Amaral "libel" case, which no one can cite the libel he's alleged to have committed.
I believe that it's very likely that the deal was that the Portuguese's reward for covering up 7/7 was that they'd be spared any pressure to take part in any NATO Gladio false flags domestically, and thus, both they and the UK are winners, as Portugal is not that important militarily and thus not needed to mount illegal wars with the pretext of mass public approval based on terrorism events, blamed on Muslims in their country---whereas in the UK's case, this is essential.
Thanks and credits to:
John Kimber for making the link in terms of a significant event and the dates;
Nick Kollestrom for proving what a total balls up the 7/7 false flag was and how many things which were really meant to be kept out of the public's eye miserably failed; and,
anyone else who can contribute and allow me to better understand if this theory has any legs, as I'm certain that it does.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUH6zXqYJPw
Following on from my:
"Thomas Sheridan: CoIntelPro monkey & sub self published author"
http://youtu.be/pl4Z1MJCbrM
"From Internet Troll to Psychopathy Expert: The Con-Artistry of Thomas Sheridan"
by Joe Quinn and Niall Bradley
Sott.net
19 08 12
http://www.sott.net/article/249840-From-Internet-Troll-to-Psychopathy-Expert-The-Con-Artistry-of-Thomas-Sheridan
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70lVqVW8DTs
Still begging for money for a reformatted show which never happened and was never meant to happen, con man, Sean Tabatabai, and his twice convicted homosexual civil partner, have a lot of explaining to do. Make a not of this date. Consider what possible good faith reason this shyster was begging for money on a promise of a new show at this time. Also, what was wrong with the show format, other than some of the useless guests that he as manager, had got on the show that he ran (a lot of which were known CoIntelPros). Who is this Sean Tabatabai and why was he calling any shots?
I think that they'll take this down at some stage, as fraudsters usually do, so please share and copy:
TPV Indiegogo Staff Vox Pop: Sean
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAsFxLH2O10
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1u1FIvpGJzA
Brian Gerrish has used very clever techniques to agitate a movement, by telling what appears to be true stories, focusing on things that people care about, such as the encroaching EU, lack of accountability. Some of the things he latched onto and spoke about were deliberately not quite right though, but people don't care about this if his overall message seems like something that they can get behind.
In the Birkenhead Operation, Brian let his proxy organisation, the British Constitution Group head up the action, with its monkey 'leader' Roger Hayes. Roger is a horrible betrayer, liar and user, and this means that when the time comes to throw him off the bus, it will be easy to do. Also, Roger's not very bright and has no support of anyone who has any idea what they are doing, so he's effectively a sitting duck-monkey.
If you'll note, the BCG basically uses all of the same resources as the UKC, but they're separate. This is classic artificial separation of an actual whole, to make them fire walled.
Brian never denounced Roger and positioned himself to be in support, but this was never formalized.
Note also that Brian's talks weren't always uploaded to the internet. Some talks just never made it up there. This is not a coincidence.
Brian is a Marxist trained coagitator, disruptor, chaos bringer and revolutionary. He's a change agent, like those that are used by the Communists to bring in change in the target area. This change will never be possible to achieve without whipping up hatred of the masses for a certain group, as the demise of the entire target population is the aim and will be the reason for the coagitator's presence. Without venomous hatred of a percieved threat, the coagitator's role of destroying the wider target will never get off the ground.
The concept relies on the target population's composite groups destroying themselves due to hatred that's whipped up, lead by a hidden hand.
Roger Hayes is a low life, and make no mistake, but he's a cut out hate figure all the same.
Please comment and share.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rduI9xprfqY